MIGs in Space
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
MIGs in Space
And pigs might fly.......
New Russian MiG interceptor will be able to operate in space – developer’s CEO
The cutting-edge interceptor aircraft, which has been under development for several years, will be able to reach space and even potentially operate without a pilot, according to the CEO of the MiG corporation working on the project.
The research and development of the PAK DP (perspective aviation complex of long-range interceptor) was launched by the MiG Corporation in 2013. PAK DP, dubbed by media with the unofficial designation MiG-41, is expected to replace the aging long-range interceptor MiG-31 and its variants.
The new fighter will be a spiritual successor of MiG-31, MiG Corporation CEO Ilya Tarasenko stated, shedding some light on the interceptor under development. “[The development] is at the stage of finalizing the image of the plane. It will be a gradual transition from MiG-31 to PAK DA,” Tarasenko told RT at the Army-2017 expo in Kubinka on Wednesday. The “Army-2017” forum is held in the “Patriot” Congress and Exhibition Center, Alabino Military Training Grounds and Kubinka Airfield in Moscow Region. The forum features cutting-edge novelties of the defense industrial complex and is a platform for holding negotiations and striking deals. Aside from the experts, the event also attracts the general public to marvel at the deadly military hardware on the ground and in the air.
The plane, however, will not be just a modernization of MiG-31, it will be an entirely new machine, having “the ability to operate in space, new weapons, new speeds, new operational range,” Tarasenko told Zvezda TV channel on Tuesday. “It will be an entirely new plane, where entirely new technologies to operate in the Arctic zone will be utilized. This plane will safeguard the whole border of our homeland. Later, the project will become unmanned,” TASS quoted Tarasenko as saying.
While the plane is still under development, it might go to into production by the mid-2020s, Tarasenko believes. “We’re shaping our technical offer, so that the customer would make a decision on the need to develop the plane. … According to our internal estimates, we should make it to the serial development in 2025,” Tarasenko told RT.
To meet expectations, the new plane should be able to fly at speeds at least four times faster than the speed of sound, Russian media earlier reported, citing renowned test pilot Anatoly Kvochur. If the plane would be able to reach such speeds, it would be likely packed, to some degree, with artificial intelligence control systems, to help human pilots to cope with the extreme flight conditions, aviation expert Fabrizio Poli said. “It will have certain elements of artificial intelligence built into the jet, because, obviously, flying at those speeds, the human brain is not capable of thinking that fast,” Poli told RT. “There are a lot of new technologies going to be put into this aircraft, for sure.”
The plane might be also equipped with laser weapons, as Russia possesses prototypes of such arms, according to Vladimir Mikheev, an aide to the Radio-Electronic Technologies Concern Deputy CEO, who believes, however, that such systems will belong to the sixth-generation fighters. “The laser weapons will allow this interceptor aircraft to intercept enemy missiles and disengage the targets,” Poli said.
New Russian MiG interceptor will be able to operate in space – developer’s CEO
The cutting-edge interceptor aircraft, which has been under development for several years, will be able to reach space and even potentially operate without a pilot, according to the CEO of the MiG corporation working on the project.
The research and development of the PAK DP (perspective aviation complex of long-range interceptor) was launched by the MiG Corporation in 2013. PAK DP, dubbed by media with the unofficial designation MiG-41, is expected to replace the aging long-range interceptor MiG-31 and its variants.
The new fighter will be a spiritual successor of MiG-31, MiG Corporation CEO Ilya Tarasenko stated, shedding some light on the interceptor under development. “[The development] is at the stage of finalizing the image of the plane. It will be a gradual transition from MiG-31 to PAK DA,” Tarasenko told RT at the Army-2017 expo in Kubinka on Wednesday. The “Army-2017” forum is held in the “Patriot” Congress and Exhibition Center, Alabino Military Training Grounds and Kubinka Airfield in Moscow Region. The forum features cutting-edge novelties of the defense industrial complex and is a platform for holding negotiations and striking deals. Aside from the experts, the event also attracts the general public to marvel at the deadly military hardware on the ground and in the air.
The plane, however, will not be just a modernization of MiG-31, it will be an entirely new machine, having “the ability to operate in space, new weapons, new speeds, new operational range,” Tarasenko told Zvezda TV channel on Tuesday. “It will be an entirely new plane, where entirely new technologies to operate in the Arctic zone will be utilized. This plane will safeguard the whole border of our homeland. Later, the project will become unmanned,” TASS quoted Tarasenko as saying.
While the plane is still under development, it might go to into production by the mid-2020s, Tarasenko believes. “We’re shaping our technical offer, so that the customer would make a decision on the need to develop the plane. … According to our internal estimates, we should make it to the serial development in 2025,” Tarasenko told RT.
To meet expectations, the new plane should be able to fly at speeds at least four times faster than the speed of sound, Russian media earlier reported, citing renowned test pilot Anatoly Kvochur. If the plane would be able to reach such speeds, it would be likely packed, to some degree, with artificial intelligence control systems, to help human pilots to cope with the extreme flight conditions, aviation expert Fabrizio Poli said. “It will have certain elements of artificial intelligence built into the jet, because, obviously, flying at those speeds, the human brain is not capable of thinking that fast,” Poli told RT. “There are a lot of new technologies going to be put into this aircraft, for sure.”
The plane might be also equipped with laser weapons, as Russia possesses prototypes of such arms, according to Vladimir Mikheev, an aide to the Radio-Electronic Technologies Concern Deputy CEO, who believes, however, that such systems will belong to the sixth-generation fighters. “The laser weapons will allow this interceptor aircraft to intercept enemy missiles and disengage the targets,” Poli said.
Why not. The technology associated with the X15 enabled many aspects of what is being considered.
Today we have the X37b, with an internal stores bay, doing who knows what, where, when, …
SABRE engine, sometime, tomorrow, next day,...
Never underestimate human iginuitiy.
Today we have the X37b, with an internal stores bay, doing who knows what, where, when, …
SABRE engine, sometime, tomorrow, next day,...
Never underestimate human iginuitiy.
Well, the NF-104A managed 120000ft around 50+ years ago. But only by flying a specific ballistic trajectory. Hence only exceptional pilots were able to cope; big mouth Yeager didn't bother with a brief and as a result destroyed one by his own incompetence 
. Then tried to blame the aircraft....
. Then tried to blame the aircraft....
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Europe
Age: 55
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Supposing for a moment that this machine will be capable of achieving mach 4 at say somewhere like 20km high, and of then pulling into a steep climb. Considering what they achieved with the MiG-25 prototype, that shouldn't be out of the question. Then the engines might continue working, at progressively reduced thrust, till somewhere between 35 and 40km, as they have before on the F104 and MiG, briefly. From there, the plane might coast ballistically to somewhere like 100km high (check the potential and kinetic energies, even allowing for air friction) sort of like the Virgin Galactic rocket plane is supposed to. But it'll then be operating in deep vacuum, where no aerodynamic steering will be effective, so it would effectively drop down like a stone until it reached a sufficiently dense atmosphere again; by which time it would likely be torn apart by friction, unless designed for such stunts.
To summarize, human ingenuity yes, but Russian hyperbole too.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I can imagine that those who have seen the wrong side of "Ballistic", getting up there is the easy part, it's where you're at when you return to being non-ballistic that matters. Trajectory, free fall dynamics, vehicle stress and human factors when the driver is virtually SLF is the tricky bit.
Control was managed without main engine thrust in the shuttle so not insurmountable, and I am sure something similar is being done in the X37B but in a "fighting" Mig
Imagegear
Control was managed without main engine thrust in the shuttle so not insurmountable, and I am sure something similar is being done in the X37B but in a "fighting" Mig
Imagegear
The dividing line is something between having an armed Virgin Galactic - up and down, with some manoeuvre capability, or the X37 with orbital capability.
The choice between them depends on the role envisaged for the vehicle and the likely weapons systems.
A VG type, ground launch, alternative engines could be like a point defence aircraft, but at speeds and altitudes which offer enormous gains in weapon range; providing the detector systems can match that - not excluding ground based or other airborne detections. It would be expected to have an intercept capability against conventional aircraft at ranges in excess of a stand-off weapon launch and probably an anti satellite or even anti ICBM capability. There might even be an attack stand off capability (anti ship / submarine). This is typical for the requirements of large territory defence systems, N America, Canada, Russia.
The X 37 type would be more like a space battle platform, but with limitations of orbital mechanics. The ability to launch a reconnaissance vehicle on a selectable one orbit or even fully manoeuvrable orbital track could be very useful. This might be beyond a ‘fighter’ designation, except if the vehicle has a runway take off, followed by a choice to orbit or return to base. Again refer to the expected role.
Both options might require developed HOTOL type technology, and possibly alternatives to the SABRE engine. Yet the jet engine started life in two guises, axial and centrifugal, so why not a jet, ramjet, rocket, with a bit of linear acceleration for take off (with ski jump for upwardness).
The choice between them depends on the role envisaged for the vehicle and the likely weapons systems.
A VG type, ground launch, alternative engines could be like a point defence aircraft, but at speeds and altitudes which offer enormous gains in weapon range; providing the detector systems can match that - not excluding ground based or other airborne detections. It would be expected to have an intercept capability against conventional aircraft at ranges in excess of a stand-off weapon launch and probably an anti satellite or even anti ICBM capability. There might even be an attack stand off capability (anti ship / submarine). This is typical for the requirements of large territory defence systems, N America, Canada, Russia.
The X 37 type would be more like a space battle platform, but with limitations of orbital mechanics. The ability to launch a reconnaissance vehicle on a selectable one orbit or even fully manoeuvrable orbital track could be very useful. This might be beyond a ‘fighter’ designation, except if the vehicle has a runway take off, followed by a choice to orbit or return to base. Again refer to the expected role.
Both options might require developed HOTOL type technology, and possibly alternatives to the SABRE engine. Yet the jet engine started life in two guises, axial and centrifugal, so why not a jet, ramjet, rocket, with a bit of linear acceleration for take off (with ski jump for upwardness).
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What VG, what X-37B? Just see imagination flying high after reading the words "operate in space" :-)
In reality, the roots of these words are back in 80's when F-15 was an experimental platform for ASAT and "symmetrically" one of modifications of MiG-31 was developed for a similar purpose in SU. Just a platform, "space" was a business of a missile. Tons of publications on that subject on the Net.
Thus, nothing really challenging. Sounds like 40 y.o. technologies would be taken from the shelf (full of dust) and a little bit updated.
In reality, the roots of these words are back in 80's when F-15 was an experimental platform for ASAT and "symmetrically" one of modifications of MiG-31 was developed for a similar purpose in SU. Just a platform, "space" was a business of a missile. Tons of publications on that subject on the Net.
Thus, nothing really challenging. Sounds like 40 y.o. technologies would be taken from the shelf (full of dust) and a little bit updated.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK on a crosswind
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder if we are dealing with a bad translation. Did he say космическое пространство? Or did he say "near space"? Or did the word до feature in there somewhere. I (and a lot of others here) have flown at or above 60,000 ft and it feels like space but certainly isn't, however if he was talking non-specifically about above 100,000 it could be quite possible for current technology. He specified an entirely new aircraft not a development of an existing one, so we may not be talking "current technology" but something more advanced and maybe well in excess of 100,000 is possible? He also wasn't specific about timing ... perhaps wisely.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
He specified an entirely new aircraft not a development of an existing one, so we may not be talking "current technology" but something more advanced and......He also wasn't specific about timing ... perhaps wisely.
While the plane is still under development, it might go to into production by the mid-2020s, Tarasenko believes. “We’re shaping our technical offer, so that the customer would make a decision on the need to develop the plane. … According to our internal estimates, we should make it to the serial development in 2025,” Tarasenko told RT.
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Maine USA
Age: 82
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not quite clear on what a space-capable interceptor would intercept that wouldn't be more economically intercepted by a conventional interceptor firing a space-capable missile. Anyone?