Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

IAF F-16 with Stunner as AAM?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

IAF F-16 with Stunner as AAM?

Old 2nd Jun 2017, 06:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 9,965
IAF F-16 with Stunner as AAM?

Alert 5 » Israeli F-16I carrying Stunner missile - Military Aviation News

An Israeli Air Force F-16I has been spotted carrying the Stunner interceptor from the David’s Sling air defense missile system.

Israeli Stunner: The future of US AAMs?



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David%27s_Sling

"....Operating at Mach 7.5 speeds and with a cruising range of 300 km, the Stunner missile is designed to intercept the newest generation of tactical ballistic missiles at low altitude, such as Iskander, using an on-board dual CCD/IR seekers to distinguish between decoys and the actual warhead of the missile, in addition to tracking by Elta EL/M-2084 Active electronically scanned array multi-mode radar. The multi-stage interceptor consists of a solid-fuel, rocket motor booster, followed by an asymmetrical kill vehicle with advanced steering for super-maneuverability during the kill-stage. A three-pulse motor provides additional acceleration and maneuverability during the terminal phase. David's Sling became operational in April 2017".......

Last edited by ORAC; 2nd Jun 2017 at 06:15.
ORAC is online now  
Old 2nd Jun 2017, 13:27
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: The Gulf Coast
Posts: 617
Does it get to Mach 7.5 without the booster from the SAM system?
T28B is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2017, 13:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 746
Where are we looking - the wing-tip mounts?
dead_pan is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2017, 14:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 344
dead-pan
It appears to be the white-nosed one, based on the fin positions on the body with reference to the ground-launched pic in the Wiki reference.
f
BTW, what are those "embolisms" behind the air intake?
F
fleigle is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2017, 15:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,129
Originally Posted by fleigle
...It appears to be the white-nosed one...
The white nosed missile is an AIM-120, it's the one on the other wing tip with twin rear fins

Originally Posted by fleigle
BTW, what are those "embolisms" behind the air intake?
F
Since it's an F-16I Sufa, the intake bulges, among others, contain 'undisclosed equipment' specific to Israel, similarly the F-16D 'Barak' has a number of intriguing bulges too...

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2017, 15:48
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 513
Originally Posted by fleigle View Post
dead-pan
It appears to be the white-nosed one, based on the fin positions on the body with reference to the ground-launched pic in the Wiki reference.
No, it's the missile on the F-16's *right* wingtip (the missile on the left, as you view the photo).
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2017, 16:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,633
Where's the other half of the booster?
glad rag is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2017, 16:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 49
Posts: 1,398
Ok I really don't know much about military hardware but are we to believe that these small missiles can do Mach 7 over 300km, complete with steering, integrated warhead etc ? They seem quite small to pack so much capacity

Last edited by atakacs; 3rd Jun 2017 at 07:59.
atakacs is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 02:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 786
atakacs
good point - Hollywood syndrome?
BTW is that an arrester hook? - who's carrier would they be using?
I think those bulges are for the pilots balls.
walter kennedy is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2017, 02:34
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,129
Originally Posted by walter kennedy
BTW is that an arrester hook? - who's carrier would they be using?
Yes, it's an arrester hook, used on runways with a RHAG or similar arrester gear during emergency/precautionary landings (hydraulic failure etc) , most FJ's have one, they're not the exclusive reserve of carrier based jets you know...

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 05:37
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,893
Atakacs has a point. How does it do all that with four times the published range of the larger AMRAAM...and why does it look like it's been dropped?

Last edited by ShotOne; 4th Jun 2017 at 05:49.
ShotOne is online now  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 06:43
  #12 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 9,965
Israel Is Testing An Air-To-Air Variant Of Its Dolphin-Nosed Stunner Missile - The Drive



".... Stunner has a three-pulse motor that outputs different thrust levels during different portions of its flight profile. In particular, it provides added acceleration and maneuverability during the missile's terminal attack phase. The Stunner carries no warhead, instead it is a hit-to-kill system, so the missile can be built more compact and lighter, and more of its internal space can be used for fuel than a traditional anti-air missile that carries a heavy blast fragmentation warhead.

Above all else, the Stunner is unique because of its guidance system. The missile uses three major sensors to guide it toward its target and to pulverize it. A data-link provides the missile with mid-course updates so that it can come within range of activating its novel dual-mode seeker. The missile has a unique, canted "dolphin nose," which came to be as the result of the demands of fitting both an electro-optical/imaging infrared sensor and a active radar sensor in the compact nose section of the missile.".....
ORAC is online now  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 08:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,893
How unusual for ppune, a complete straightforward answer. Thank you, ORAC
ShotOne is online now  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 09:20
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 746
So basically we're looking at the terminal phase portion of the missile? As others have noted I struggled to imagine the missile pictured reaching out to 300km on its lonesome.

What's the range of the F16?
dead_pan is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 10:43
  #15 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 9,965
We are looking at the mid-flight cruise and terminal component of the ground based missile. The question being how much, if any, range is lost by replacing the boost motor with the kinetic energy provided by the launch aircraft height and speed.

If you half the weight by eliminating the warhead and shrinking the size of the missile, but keep the same fuel load, do you double the range over a similar missile - or does reducing the overall drag give you even more range? If I remember correctly, for every pound of primary structure saved the overall weight of an aircraft or missile can be reduced by around 10 pounds. The weight of the equivalent AIM-120 WDU-33 warhead is 50lbs, out of a total weight of 335lbs. Lots of room for additional fuel.

Of interest in the article I link to above which suggests that the smaller size of the Stunner and its lock after launch make it a match for the F-35, with 6-8 being able to be carried internally, doubling its air-to-air payload.

Last edited by ORAC; 4th Jun 2017 at 11:11.
ORAC is online now  
Old 4th Jun 2017, 18:56
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,858
The joy of all that fuel and little else beyond the guidance package, is that it dumps the majority of its weight during flight.

The range will still be a fraction of that achieved in its original role as the target will not be doing so much of the work. Still, a multimode missile that goes quite far, quite fast and has significant end-game energy is nothing but reassuringly nasty - if you are on the correct side of the trigger press that is.
Just This Once... is online now  
Old 5th Jun 2017, 08:34
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 702
Perhaps the Slammer doesn't have a ballistic mode ?

BVR to become BRR ?
Lordflasheart is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2017, 12:52
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 952
Can we stop calling it a missile, this is a hitile.
beardy is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2017, 14:59
  #19 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 9,965
Designed to hit rockets only slightly larger than itself fired from Gaza and Lebanon. An aircraft should be a doddle..
ORAC is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.