Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New "Hunter"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Apr 2017, 12:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Thailand
Age: 81
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
New "Hunter"

ustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) will produce a radically modernised version of the 1950s-vintage Hawker Hunter jet fighter.

The original Hunter, a British design, first flew in 1951 and was widely exported. It proved popular with the Indian Air Force, which ordered the type in 1954. The Hunter’s proven airframe will provide a low-risk basis for the new design, the name of which will be ‘Langoor’ in air force service. The Langoor is intended to solve India’s fighter shortage with the minimum of cost and risk, while embracing the national ‘Make in India‘ initiative to develop indigenous weapon systems and technologies. The Swedish aero-company Saab, with its proven track record, will be the partner nation for the Langoor’s testing phase. Lessons learned from the painfully slow Tejas programme, and the mired MMRCA fighter acquirement will inform the project which is intended to emphasise modest and realisable goals. According to Parrikar, the type will enter service in 2022 and will offer reliability alongside operating costs 25% that of the Sukhoi Su-30, with a unit cost at least 70% lower than that of Tejas. The design will prioritise long range and ‘rugged’ reliability over high performance, and will feature proven systems to ensure a high level of combat effectiveness. Parrikar noted that “Mach 1.5+ performance is not necessary for the vast majority of combat missions, yet this requirement has until now dominated our search for future fighters. The use of heavily networked slower assets within a force that includes faster aircraft, like the Su-30, will prove more effective, far cheaper and will give the Indian Air Force what it most needs: larger, safer and more reliable forces. Langoor will be a game-changer.”

The Langoor will differ from the Hunter in many respects-

The original engine Rolls-Royce Avon will be replaced by the Eurojet EJ200
Sensors will include the Swedish PS-05/A radar
New lightweight helmet cueing system
Internal armament of one GSh-23-mm cannon
New wing to be designed with BAE Systems
Glass cockpit
Weapons to include R-73 short range air-to-air missiles
India is expected to order between 250-400 aircraft. Most of the design work has been completed and a prototype is expected to fly in 2019, with service entry scheduled for 2022.

Sen
oldpax is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2017, 12:45
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 706
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Indian combat aircraft acquisition can best be described as "shambolic".

It was only yesterday that they announced a plan for local production of the F-16, and now we have the "Super Hunter"? Not to mention the MiG-29, Su30MKI, and of course the Rafale
Fonsini is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2017, 14:41
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Age: 61
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
translation....india really misses her MIG21s.
mr fish is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2017, 15:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I gather the announcement was made on 1 April. Any significance?
Genstabler is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2017, 16:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,803
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
Having googled the 'HAL Langoor', it seems all the websites are repeats of exactly the same text. Does India do 1 April?
MPN11 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2017, 17:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Age: 54
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I'm sure there was a thread a while ago where someone asked if a new build Hunter would be practical?
Tashengurt is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2017, 20:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is Indian procurement really so shambolic?? Sure there are aspects which could be so described; I met some BAe workers who spent nearly a week in their hotel waiting for a permit to allow them on base. But their pragmatic approach and willingness to deal with eastern and western suppliers gets them a lot of jets in the sky for a fraction of what we spend
ShotOne is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2017, 19:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't Langoor hindi for Baboon?
Legalapproach is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2017, 19:13
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,803
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by Legalapproach
Isn't Langoor hindi for Baboon?
I thought langoors were those skinny monkeys. Danny42C will undoubtedly advise!
MPN11 is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2017, 21:09
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,853
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by MPN11
I thought langoors were those skinny monkeys. Danny42C will undoubtedly advise!
Only the Grey ones!

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2017, 07:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 65
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you put a new wing, new engine and new avionics onto a Hunter fuselage, aren't you really building a new aeroplane?
seafury45 is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2017, 08:54
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Age: 58
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Triggers broom springs to mind
ExRAFRadar is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2017, 09:34
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 607
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
If you put a new wing, new engine and new avionics onto a Hunter fuselage, aren't you really building a new aeroplane?
Yep, a brand new Hunter!
H Peacock is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2017, 12:18
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,803
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
Apart from that original link, and the others that just repeated the text, has anyone encountered any other validation?
MPN11 is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2017, 14:28
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southwater
Age: 73
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
But will it have the blue note?
RedhillPhil is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2017, 16:28
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: At home
Posts: 1,232
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Does the company selected to design the wing still have a capability to do so? I was under the impression that property development of 'brownfield sites' was their forte these days.
Mechta is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2017, 04:53
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Torquay Vic
Age: 76
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As HAL are building and IAF are operating the Hawk trainer, an updated Hawk 200 might make more sense than a reinvented Hunter. No blue note though.
KJ994 is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2017, 09:08
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,706
Received 35 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by KJ994
As HAL are building and IAF are operating the Hawk trainer, an updated Hawk 200 might make more sense than a reinvented Hunter. No blue note though.
Problem with the Hawk is that Rolls Royce are on the naughty step for using middlemen/agents.

Otherwise the new improved Hawk recently touted may well meet their requirements
Davef68 is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2017, 16:21
  #19 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
This page confirms Genstabler's suspicion
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2017, 16:24
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,803
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by airborne_artist
This page confirms Genstabler's suspicion
Yea, same text, same joke
MPN11 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.