Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Fighter Pilot Longevity ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Fighter Pilot Longevity ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Apr 2017, 01:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Best 6 seconds of her life I'm sure....
West Coast is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 03:23
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Wild West (UK)
Age: 45
Posts: 1,151
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
LJ: I'm sorry to hear of your losses.

Back to the original question: I've wondered the same thing. I started practising medicine in 2009 and have looked after a number of WWII pilots, as well as a number of aircraft mechanics. I have also looked after a few people who served in various roles in the army, but it seems to me that the RAF personnel seemed to be disproportionately represented and to be in particularly good nick for their ages.

Impressions can mislead, but it would be worth looking into.
abgd is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 06:01
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 79
Posts: 542
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
I had the privilege yesterday of singing at the funeral of Flt Lt George Harris RAF (Ret) in Hong Kong Cathedral. He died last month aged 93. His son gave a moving eulogy. He had tried to enlist at the age of 16 in 1939 but was told to b----- off and come back in two years' time. He did and trained in Rhodesia before flying Mustangs in Burma. I met him here a couple of times and of course he had a fund of riveting stories. He had a son and a daughter and was cremated wearing his RAF pilot's tie.
Barksdale Boy is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 07:01
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Best 6 seconds of her life I'm sure....
Don't judge others by your own standards, Westie!
BEagle is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 07:06
  #25 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Rossian
....and I suspect it might be whoever pays our pensions. In 1965 the average length of time for a full career officer retiring at 55 to draw his pension was - THREE YEARS!!!
My just about to be my F-i-L showed me those figures from the (as it was then)
Officers' Pension Society.
At one of my resettlement financial seminars in about 1996/7 I asked the question again but no-one seemed to know the answer.

The Ancient Mariner

(F-i-L lived to 91,chuffed to bits that he'd beaten the actuarial odds)
Seconded. One, Tommy Thompson, a single Nav died at 55 on retirement.

Another factor relevant in early 60s was survival. Our dep nav instructor to us all, to stunned silence, announced at 50% would be dead by 38. He was not far off. I read a novel about a USAF F100 wing in UK which suggested can equally high mortality among aircrew.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 07:54
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To live a long life you have to have something to live a long life FOR.

90-year-old former aviators mostly have two things in common: they did all the wrong things as far as good health is concerned when they were young, but they settled into a meaningful, healthy and satisfying life in retirement. They found something other than flying to live for.

Not as easy, or as common, as it might seem.
Albert Driver is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 07:58
  #27 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,141
Received 223 Likes on 65 Posts
I plan to live forever. So far, so good.
Herod is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 08:06
  #28 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Albert, very true. Of my Rotary Club most of the members when I joined, and all older than me, are still there 20 years on with only two who have shuffled off, one very old and one a heavy smoker.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 08:10
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Denver,Co USA
Age: 76
Posts: 333
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would think that the screening that military pilots have to pass just to be admitted to the club would put them among the healthiest people so it makes sense that on average they would stay healthy longer.
Rick777 is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 08:44
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wensleydale

Boys can be born, but girls are more likely. If you want a boy, then beware of coming home from a flying detachment where the second bang is the door closing behind you when you get home!


W. (Two daughters - both born on a flying tour).
Two boys, sired in (almost) exactly those circumstances. Mind you, on the ME fleet I found going away for a couple of weeks of intense alcohol, nicotine, food, & gasoline fuelled fun, without 'adult' supervision, infinitely more relaxing than putting in face time on the sqn.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 08:58
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: East Anglia
Age: 77
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Why daughters?

Personally I subscribe to the 'g' school of thought. On my first squadron (Lightnings) all new offspring were daughters but then a 'g' limit was imposed on the F6 fleet in an attempt to reduce fatigue index consumption and all subsequent issue on our squadron were sons, my first included. My second son 3 years later was born while I was on a ground tour thus furthering the 'g' theory.
nipva is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 09:09
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem with answering the OP's question is that fighter pilots are a small statistical subset, even in a survey of RAF officers. My extensive research (5min on google!) threw up two surveys for pilots generally; an ALPA (US pilots union) which showed pilots dying three years younger than wider population. Confusingly, figures from a study of American Airlines pilots showed the opposite, with them living five years longer than average American white males.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 10:15
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rossian
....and I suspect it might be whoever pays our pensions. In 1965 the average length of time for a full career officer retiring at 55 to draw his pension was - THREE YEARS!!!
My just about to be my F-i-L showed me those figures from the (as it was then)
Officers' Pension Society.
At one of my resettlement financial seminars in about 1996/7 I asked the question again but no-one seemed to know the answer.
ONS did quite a bit of work on this, and the AFPS15 discussion document claimed that in general, those who were commissioned into the Armed Forces tended to live a little longer than civilian counterparts. Those who were enlisted lived a slightly shorter life.

• A UK male who was aged 60 in 2010 would generally have a life expectancy of 86 years and a similar female would have a life expectancy of 88 years.
• A retired male Officer who was aged 60 in 2010 would have a life expectancy of 90 and a similar female would have a life expectancy of 92.
• A retired male Other Rank who was aged 60 in 2010 would have a life expectancy of 87 and a similar female would have a life expectancy of 90.

The morale of the story is clear. I should have enlisted for only a couple of years, got commissioned and then identified as female.
Al R is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 10:40
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Al R
ONS did quite a bit of work on this, and the AFPS15 discussion document claimed that in general, those who were commissioned into the Armed Forces tended to live a little longer than civilian counterparts. Those who were enlisted lived a slightly shorter life.

• A UK male who was aged 60 in 2010 would generally have a life expectancy of 86 years and a similar female would have a life expectancy of 88 years.
• A retired male Officer who was aged 60 in 2010 would have a life expectancy of 90 and a similar female would have a life expectancy of 92.
• A retired male Other Rank who was aged 60 in 2010 would have a life expectancy of 87 and a similar female would have a life expectancy of 90.

The morale of the story is clear. I should have enlisted for only a couple of years, got commissioned and then identified as female.
Al R beat me to it, but in a far more informative manner. Discussing this very thing last year with a chum in MB who had been talking to the Pensions lot and he said the same as Al, albeit with the extra caveat of Services thrown in. Retired RAF (officers) had the best chances for longevity with Army (ORs) in last with the RN bobbing around the middle. Probably obvious if you think about it really and assume that individuals actually make it to retirement.

In light of this discussion, when my Stn Cdr asked me what my career aspirations were a while back, told him to draw more in pension than I did in salary. He initially frowned, then you could see the cogs turn before he realised I might just be on to something. He still wouldn't let me put that and lottery winner down as aspirations on JPA though. No sense of humour some people 😁

But I do also wonder whether as hard as the military life can be sometimes it is also a lifestyle that leads to longevity? Relatively active, we are supposed to take care of ourselves - fitness tests, medicals etc and a bit of mental challenge trying to square circles, all the things that we read about as being good for warding off dementia, heart disease etc. Certainly a lot of my civilian family and friends of the same age but without the military lifestyle look far more harassed, haggard and overweight than I do.

Edited to add - the M/F question - does that also extend to associated Branches / Trades? I know a few Comms Engineers and ABMs and daughters seem to be the norm there too. My ex's father was a very senior Comms type, desperate for a son, over the years and tours he kept popping out daughters. Good for me at the time, but he did look harassed!!!

Last edited by Melchett01; 9th Apr 2017 at 10:50.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 10:53
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Kalgoorlie, W.A. , Australia
Age: 86
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May I suggest that g is not the cause of sex selection in offspring but rate of change of g. This may explain the motor sport connection especial considering the frequency of rate of change.
Pom Pax is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 11:35
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Wild West (UK)
Age: 45
Posts: 1,151
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Presidents of the usa and other alpha males also have more girls. I don't know why, but I doubt it has to do with g-force.
abgd is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 13:07
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,501
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
I thought fighter pilots were all talk and no action
brakedwell is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 13:39
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Godforsakencountry
Posts: 281
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Pontious Navigator

I read a novel about a USAF F100 wing
Was the novel any good, and if so, could you give the title please?

But back to the thread. I read a report somewhere which said the most important thing regarding longevity for retired officers was if they got another job. Those that did, lived far longer than those who simply retired at 55 and did nothing afterwards.

Last edited by Argonautical; 9th Apr 2017 at 14:33. Reason: spelling
Argonautical is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 13:41
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If we're going to include WW2 pilots, as several have here, that can only be used to bump up the average by the statistical atrocity of ignoring the thousands who died tragically young in that conflict.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 15:27
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's just another perk of flying - Fly high, fly fast and live (a tiny bit) longer!

Albeit minimal, Einstein's twin paradox (time dilation) theories back you up (assuming you don't cock-up on the job, that is).

The case of the travelling twins ? Einstein Online
dynamics is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.