Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Britains new ships so noisy they can be detected 100 miles away

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Britains new ships so noisy they can be detected 100 miles away

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Feb 2017, 11:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,892
Received 2,830 Likes on 1,208 Posts
Britains new ships so noisy they can be detected 100 miles away

Now don't get me wrong but isn't the reasoning behind the shape of these things in the first place to make them stealthy????





British warships are 'so noisy' Russian submarines can hear them 100 miles away


and I quote


The MoD said that because the Type 45 was an air defence battleship, stealth was not a “premium requirement”.
now bar them being promoted to "battleships" and being spoken about in past tense, surely their purpose in life will be to protect the carrier fleets, so if you can detect and identify them, then the logical place the find them in wartime would be with the carriers.
Or am I and the MOD missing something here.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2017, 11:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Its the usual round of daily mail hysteria promoted by long retired former officers with books to sell.

It caused guffaws among many of my former T45 mates when they read it.
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2017, 12:06
  #3 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,393
Received 1,586 Likes on 723 Posts
And no doubt the attack sub crews as they sit at home on gardening leave waiting for something seaworthy to drive around in......
ORAC is online now  
Old 11th Feb 2017, 12:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
1. Type 45 is not designed for ASW.

2. How do other nations' warships and merchant vessels compare?
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2017, 12:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WEBF is correct - they're principally an anti-air assett - think of them as the final result of the Falklands War.
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2017, 13:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 791
Received 34 Likes on 11 Posts
They are meant to be noisy. You pair a Type 45 AA frigate with a hush kitted AS frigate. While the boat's sonar operators are deafened by the 45, the AS tiptoes up behind them and sinks them. Simples.
oxenos is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2017, 15:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's 2017 we are living in, not 1940. Noise is "nice to have", but not the only factor to help detect and locate ships nowadays. Every serious military power now has a complete picture thru many hundreds miles away. So, let them scream and shout.
A_Van is offline  
Old 11th Feb 2017, 15:59
  #8 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
A Van, you might even have said 1960s for 1940 and 1970s for 2017.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 05:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PN,

As it's a chat, I exaggerate sometimes, yes. :-)

Nevertheless, in 70's USSR already had satellites and over-the-horizon radars. And though the technology improved in 40 years, physics-wise the principles remain the same.
A_Van is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 07:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 791
Received 34 Likes on 11 Posts
HMS Dragon diverted 500 miles to reach the 13 Britons and one American after the mast and rudder had broken off their 60ft (18m) yacht on Thursday.
It would have been a great comfort to them, being able to hear her coming.
oxenos is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 09:00
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 322
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would have thought the rather large emitter on top makes it pretty 'noisy' and easy to find (clearly it can be turned off, but then it is just a ship, not an AD ship)...
Aynayda Pizaqvick is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 11:08
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As this thread touches on naval matters some reader might be able to direct me to any site where a simple but obscure naval equipment question may be posed and, with luck, answered. I live in hope.
BernieC is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 11:27
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 327
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Bernie - a couple of possibilities you could try. If you google "warships1" this will take you to a series of discussion boards, including one specifically on the RN but also other specific topics. As ever with such fora they are populated by a mixture of people who know what they're talking about and those that don't, but you might get lucky. Another option is the Defence Talk maritime forum, which has some fairly knowledgeable folk. Both require registration.
Frostchamber is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 14:55
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Frostchamber - Most grateful; will try both. Am not averse to posting the question here if desired, but it is off-topic.
BernieC is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 15:48
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,811
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
You could also try the Royal Navy forum on ARRSE.
WE Branch Fanatic is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 16:26
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Squalor
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Not too difficult to find.... I think the boats will be found in the next dock along from the nuclear submarine dock. If you can't find that, have a look for a pair of big boats with a large flat deck, probably in the dock next door. ...If you see any aeroplane thingies, then somebody else's fleet is in town.
Wetstart Dryrun is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 17:22
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Alles Über
Posts: 377
Received 42 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by WE Branch Fanatic
You could also try the Royal Navy forum on ARRSE.
Failing that, the matelot equivalent could be a good shout.

https://www.navy-net.co.uk/community/
trim it out is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 19:30
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Fletcher Memorial Home
Age: 59
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course this could just be mis-information designed to confuse the enemy, or a bit of bad journalism....
Ogre is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 21:02
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hands up all those who have served in uniform if only even briefly on T45?
Er, me anyway.
Rumours were around years ago they were "noisy".
Saying that all ships are noisy, if not death traps exposed to the new generations of subs, mines, underwater stealth craft and smart weapons evolving for underwater application.
Next conflict will be an eye opener for the armchair admirals and an eye closer for the poor crews.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2017, 21:56
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,287
Received 508 Likes on 211 Posts
I suppose "noise" becomes an issue at sea.....so the RN should be quite safe.

Even the new Scottish Navy could find you lot while you are in Port.
SASless is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.