Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Ealing Council propose closure of RAF Northolt

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Ealing Council propose closure of RAF Northolt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jan 2017, 18:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stamford
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ealing Council propose closure of RAF Northolt

A suggestion has been put forward to close the historic RAF Northolt station and build 20,000 homes on the site in an attempt to combat London's housing crisis.

The idea was submitted by Ealing Council for the Mayor of London Sadiq Khan's "City for All Londoners" document which outlines challenges and opportunities from across the capital.

Ealing suggested the working 100-year-old RAF station could be closed as it “serves no real strategic importance” and the land could instead be developed for housing.

The council has called for “radical thinking” and said the plans could help meet the housing challenges London faces.
Proposal to close 100-year-old RAF Northolt base to build 20,000 homes to tackle London housing crisis - Get West London
Stuff is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2017, 19:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,737
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Just what the area needs, more ruddy houses.....

Ealing Council is run by attention seeking idiots with absolutely no understanding of anything - as a resident of the borough I have first hand experience of their continual ineptitude on just about every subject.

The impact on the road and infrastructure when just less than a 1000 homes were built on the old Taylor Woodrow complex some 2 miles up the road from RAF Northolt has been dramatic......the number they are proposing would create havoc in that area.....

Muppets.
GeeRam is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2017, 20:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: cheshire
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But your missing the point GeeRam, it's not about quality of life, it's all about ramming in as many people as possible.

Cos more people = more GDP growth = more people = more houses, rinse and repeat
andrewn is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2017, 21:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 32
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More houses = more council tax = more money for Ealing council and they will blur over the cost of additional services required.
VMD+12 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2017, 21:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Newport
Age: 70
Posts: 494
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An important site in the great scheme, HM Gov. would surely ensure they keep it in reserve for response use to anything big going off in London?
JAVELINBOY is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2017, 22:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Always thought it was in LB of Hillingdon, but maybe that was just RAF Uxbridge
Wander00 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2017, 22:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,788
Received 75 Likes on 34 Posts
"No real strategic importance"
That's a proper armchair general's observation. It doesn't take much imagination to work out that there are things other than VIP transport that a military airfield near the capital city might be used for... and not just QRA during the Olympic games.
Easy Street is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2017, 23:01
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stamford
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
HM Gov. would surely ensure they keep it in reserve for response use to anything big going off in London?
That's what many people thought about Halton after it's use for Op OLYMPIC and potential for other requirements in London. It has/had the capability to generate accommodation for thousands (if you sent the recruits home), an unrivalled ability to train people for ceremonial (or other duties) and you could reach London in under an hour (at suitably unsociable hours).

Even that, together with the apprentice history and tradition at Halton, wasn't enough to save it from the housing plan.

Is Northolt all that different?
Stuff is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 00:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,788
Received 75 Likes on 34 Posts
Much easier to get 'stuff' into Northolt quickly than it is into Halton. Also, as sites around London are binned, the stronger the case for retaining Northolt grows: with fewer and fewer potential operational sites available, the ones you keep become ever more valuable.
Easy Street is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 07:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But where would that leave Dr Rupa Huq. She and labour need those houses filled with grateful multicultural benefit recipients whose votes can be cast by the "block" to ensure the right person gets in. Tower Hamlets being an example.
JosuaNkomo is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 07:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hereford UK
Age: 68
Posts: 567
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You are spot on Javelin Boy and Easy Street

HM Gov. would surely ensure they keep it in reserve for response use to anything big going off in London?

I can't begin to think of how, on at least a hundred times without Northolt's ILS I'd have ever got into the centre of London from a beautiful city near the Welsh border and more importantly, with the passengers, I was carrying and a very very low overshoot onto the heli lanes. The Bovingdon radial 233? (Can't remember) Used to scare the crap out of me in poor weather!
MOSTAFA is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 07:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: london
Age: 58
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they can do it to kemp ton park horse track I know it's owned by the jockey club what's them not doing it to Northolt
lotus1 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 08:01
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Southeast needs more houses

No-one wants to build on the Green Belt

How many flights use Northolt? And how many of them are business jets these days?

Bit of a slam-dunk TBH

The idea it will be saved so that the RAF can fly in thousands of non-existant troops in case of "civil unrest" is fantasy.................

The only thing that will save it is that the case will be made to the politicians that they'll have to use City or LHR
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 08:40
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pathfinder Country
Posts: 505
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Or Farnborough, or Biggin, or ................. .
aw ditor is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 08:44
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
or even LHR at the end of the day..................

The Great British Public do not see airports as necessary or even desireable TBH - especially if they live near one................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 09:55
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hereford UK
Age: 68
Posts: 567
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
HH oh what a wonderful fluffy world you live in.
MOSTAFA is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 11:06
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What if JSFAW needs to maintain readiness and mount ops into London quickly? Northolt offers options that I don't think are available elsewhere.
Al R is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 11:14
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: liverpool uk
Age: 67
Posts: 1,338
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
AI R,

If I remember correctly Northolt had two Tornado's deployed there as 9/11 was happening on QRA.

If Northolt was closed down, that would make the owners of Kiddligton (Oxford) and Biggin Hill very very happy as they have tried in the past to close Northolt to civilian traffic. Are there wheels within wheels happening here?
air pig is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 11:28
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Interesting one and how hard would it be to have a number of aircraft on QRA based at the New Heathrow with immediate access to runway if required ?

Time for Green Belt to be changed as it a blight and forces more and more people into less and less space while keeping house prices too high.
racedo is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2017, 11:47
  #20 (permalink)  
ImageGear
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Time for Green Belt to be changed
//RANT ON

Having commuted into Central London on and off for 40 years, I can tell you that the Green Belt MUST to be expanded, not concreted over. When you cannot see from one side of Whitehall to other because of the smog, and people are collapsing in the street due to lack of oxygen, and the stench which rises from the ground in a morning, makes you want to vomit, and the salad vegetables grown under the approach to 09L at Heathrow arrive in local supermarkets tasting of paraffin or avgas, and your car is covered in spots of fuel, and where cattle and sheep graze on the grass covered in said fuel spots.

Where the runoff from concreted estates, airports, parking areas ends up in the River from which 20 million people drink every day. Not to mention the 5 sets of filtering kidneys anecdote.

We NEED less people and much, much, more green belt before we are all sickened or poisoned to the point of death.

//RANT OFF

There you go

Imagegear
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.