Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Vulcan Begging Bowl Out Again...

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Vulcan Begging Bowl Out Again...

Old 22nd Jan 2017, 11:39
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pathfinder Country
Posts: 505
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Leon. Only did one Tour' on them in the late 1950s' but wouldn't regard the Canberra B2/6 as that "complicated". Designed and built to a 1944 Spec. Avon 100 Series were quite basic' too. 109 on the B6/B8?

A.D.
aw ditor is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2017, 12:39
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Simply Towers.
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think VTTS made a serious mistake choosing the Canberra to resore to flight. No matter that it is a 'special' Canberra, it will never draw the public like the Vulcan could. Money would be better spent bringing the Coventry shackleton back to flight or Just Jane. The shackleton would draw far more paying spectators than any canberra,
Simplythebeast is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2017, 16:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,473
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,101 Posts
The Shack was working towards that aim but sadly hit a hitch of late, see the Flypast forums

The Canberra is pressurised, that is why I said complex, plus it has bang seats that are probably no longer supported, is it manual flying controls on it? and to be honest isn't that much of a crowd puller, probably one reason tha the VTTS are not doing so well with it, just not the interest there. It's not whether the engines are simple or not, it's who overhaul's and supports them and that is probably the problem, same went for the Vulcan,

Mossies, I think there are three airworthy now with a fourth in the wings, but I might be one to many on that.

The Lanc at East Kirby is working towards it now and I hope they get it airworthy, that will make three in total.

The Gannet at Saints was working towards it as well, but has gone quiet, the Hunter crash has sadly screwed it up for everyone.

My dream would be to see the Sunderland brought back to the U.K and flown. Having seen it flying years ago, it impressed me.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2017, 16:54
  #24 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
As NutLoose suggests, is there public support for restoration for a Cold War warrior of the 50s and 60s that was largely eclipsed by the V-bombers and mainly hidden from the British public from the 60s. I remember an excellent tight display by a T4 at Finningley probably in 1966. One particular manoeuvre was a half loop from low level, undercarriage lowered in the climb and rolling wings level from inverted flight at the top of the loop before landing. The majority of the crowd continued shopping, picnicking, or headed to the beer tent. In contrast the 4 Vulcan scramble silenced the crowd.

Much as NL would like to see the Sunderland or Gannet would they have any significance to most of the public?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2017, 17:01
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Simply Towers.
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its more spectacle than significance and a Sunderland would definately provide the spectacle.
Simplythebeast is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2017, 17:18
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stamford
Posts: 97
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The Canberra is pressurised, that is why I said complex, plus it has bang seats that are probably no longer supported, is it manual flying controls on it? and to be honest isn't that much of a crowd puller, probably one reason tha the VTTS are not doing so well with it, just not the interest there. It's not whether the engines are simple or not, it's who overhaul's and supports them and that is probably the problem, same went for the Vulcan,"


In the 17 years that I was involved with operating WK163 we were the most popular non military display team before the Vulcan came along. We actually made a small operating profit and were pretty much self supporting in the beginning before overheads became a problem and Air Atlantique stepped in to offer help. WK163 has Avon 109's not 100Srs and is not in the complex catagory, we had our own engineers, all very well qualified and aircrew equally qualified and not one of us was paid, we did it because we wanted too. It has manual flying controls and we had our own seat servicing bay authorised by Martin Baker who supported us from the start as did many other companies Kidde Graviner, CFS, Atlantique and many others who gave free support. Loosing an engine caused us great problems and protracted negotiations ran for years until the the aircraft was no longer viable without a huge injection of funds which Mike Collett was happy to give. However the passing of time and retirement of key people stalled the project until VTTS stepped in.
scorpion63 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2017, 18:08
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,725
Received 76 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Mossies, I think there are three airworthy now with a fourth in the wings, but I might be one to many on that.
No, that's correct.

KA114 & TV959 in the USA, and VR796 in Canada.

PZ474 is the next one coming along Avspecs mini production line.
GeeRam is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2017, 19:16
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, that's correct.

KA114 & TV959 in the USA, and VR796 in Canada.

PZ474 is the next one coming along Avspecs mini production line.


The People's Mosquito ? To Fly ~ To Educate ~ To Remember

My house is full of their merch. Really want to see a UK Mossie in the air.
Bigbux is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2017, 19:18
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 68
Posts: 2,027
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The clue is in the title, Vulcan To The Sky.

It's never going to happen again so shut them down and end all this jobs and perks for the boys.
Evanelpus is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2017, 19:33
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,725
Received 76 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Bigbux
The People's Mosquito ? To Fly ~ To Educate ~ To Remember

My house is full of their merch. Really want to see a UK Mossie in the air.
I wouldn't hold your breath.
GeeRam is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2017, 09:21
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brum
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This is doing the rounds on Facebook...


Some sad news today from Doncaster about the future of XH588..credit to David Robinson for the update.

A very sad day today folks, made a final visit to see XH558 in hangar three, which you might think was sad enough, but there was more bad news to come...
Today was an ideal opportunity to have a chat with one of the engineers, someone that we have known for many years, and when I asked him if he was being kept on, he dropped a bombshell by saying that no one was being kept on, all the engineering team, including Taff Stone were being laid off.
Only two people will remain, possibly on a part time basis, and I think you can guess who they are, yep Robert Pleming and Andrew Edmundson, everyone else....gone.
I asked if Taff was there today, he said no, he had left and gone for an interview, I believe he said at Cranwell.
When asked if he would go back if asked to by the Trust, he said no, not after the way they had been treated.
More info came to light, that 558 will move into hangar one and put into storage, but he said that it will only be allowed to stay there till April, if no new home has been built / found by then, she will be moved and stored outside.
Also spoke to one of the volunteers, again someone we have known for many years, and he told us that all the volunteers will leave at the end of the week, and will only return if a new home is found for 558.
At the moment folks, the future to me doesn’t look to bright.
If there are no engineers, how are they going to keep her in taxiable condition, something that the Heritage Fund said they had to do when they got the grant, hope they wont want their money back.
No one would be drawn into a conversation re WK163, except to say, that the Trust realise now that they made a mistake in buying her..
As I say, to me the future doesnt look to good, no engine runs, no taxi runs, no engineers, no volunteers and no visits for the foreseeable future for members of the public.
There is a possibility of course that all of this, and more, may be in tomorrow nights newsletter, we will have to wait with baited breath to see…
Nige321 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2017, 13:10
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well. there you go.....


A thought - was/is VTTS a "Charity"? . if so, should the Charity Commission be doing a little digging?

Last edited by Wander00; 27th Jan 2017 at 13:22. Reason: Further thoughts
Wander00 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2017, 14:55
  #33 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Wonder if it was a coincidence that Just Jane had a page wide spread in the DT this week all in the nudey all paint removed. They plan to put her together again for engine runs and taxy rides during the summer for fun raising. No begging bowl or huge CEO salaries.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2017, 15:28
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Vulcan leeches are the epitome of greedy, self-serving parasites. Sucking on the teat of Public goodwill, hiding behind an honourable purpose but carrying it out in a despicable manner. Taking ridiculous salaries to do something they could be doing for nothing. I would not give them the steam off my pee.

The brothers at the East Kirkby Airfield who are trying to get Just Jane back into the sky are the complete opposite. Genuine, passionate and public-spirited. I will be donating to the Just jane fund.

If any of the Vulcan parasites ever read this - you are rumbled. We know. And I sincerely wish ill-fortune on you all.
sidewayspeak is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2017, 15:43
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,473
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,101 Posts
Extraordinary General Meeting Needed?

Just seen the latest e-mail update, and feel exasperated.
A year in storage with no engine runs, and only a hope that free storage will be extended past April. Taff to keep her in current state - I've no idea how the systems will be kept live if there are no engine runs - I suspect she is being mothballed, so everything will stop working for at least a year, and then cost a fortune to bring her back to her current state....Another last ditch appeal no doubt.

The new hangar is being leased by the trust not owned by it - in the same way we leased hangar 3, and look where that has got us. No information on the length of lease - is it a perpetual lease, and what safeguards are there to prevent us being kicked out when another tenant offers them more money for the use of it?

Apparently all the obstacles to taxi runs have been resolved - just in time to be moved into storage! Why not taxy her there in front of us all?! Nothing in the Q&A to indicate if the airport will allow spectators onto the airfield? They weren't interested in allowing this for the final flight, so what has changed?

The Q&A's are an insult to anyone with any knowledge - Bruntingthorpe not suitable because of the runway - which of course is why the Cold War jets all use it twice a year without issue. Oh and because we cant fly the Canberra from there - sorry to point out the bleeding obvious, but the main reason we wont fly the Canberra is there is no money to restore or operate her, so thoughts about the suitability of a runway are irrelevant! No mention of any consultation with the CAA on a one-off ferry flight to somewhere people can go and see her - even though it is possible given her current state of maintenance.

According to the last accounts Dr Pleming drew between £70 -£80K in the last year - doing what exactly? Why is he paid at all - none of the trustees are. His salary is close on 25% of the total expenditure of the trust - How on earth is that acceptable to anyone?

I really feel those at the top have lost their way, and let everyone down.

I'm sorry to say I'm done with this project.....Good luck everyone - I hope you are successful, but I will be truly amazed if she ever taxies again, let alone in front of her loyal supporters.

Over and Out.....
NutLoose is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2017, 15:45
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,473
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,101 Posts
Vulcan To The Sky - Survival Q and A
NutLoose is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2017, 16:15
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the wife
Posts: 371
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Quote by Dr Pleming:

..... The damage that can be caused to heritage jet engines by even very small pieces of debris can be terminal, we need to avoid unmaintained runways.....
..and silicagel bags???
4mastacker is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2017, 16:48
  #38 (permalink)  
wub
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,213
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Beat me to it 4mastacker, that jumped right off the page at me.
wub is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2017, 19:15
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,473
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,101 Posts
And to think we even used to reverse taxi vc10 with all the associated crap thrown up in front of the intake with no problems, and they bleat on about debris, plenty of legacy era jets hurtling down the strips mentioned, sucking just as much air through them and closer to the ground with no damage incurred. Smoke and mirrors.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2017, 19:28
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,783
Received 257 Likes on 103 Posts
And to think we even used to reverse taxi vc10 with all the associated crap thrown up in front of the intake with no problems
No 'we' didn't, don't talk bolleaux!
BEagle is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.