Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Poland to Buy 96 F-16s??

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Poland to Buy 96 F-16s??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jan 2017, 09:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,368
Received 1,568 Likes on 714 Posts
Poland to Buy 96 F-16s??

Story in Alert 5 - Linked to original Polish story. Maybe someone can translate.

Alert 5: Poland exploring the possibility of buying up to 96 second-hand F-16s

Poland is reported to be exploring the possibility of buying up to 96 second-hand F-16s and to overhaul and upgrade them in the country.

F-16 z drugiej ręki dla Polski. MON planuje zakup 96 myśliwców z odzysku

The Defence Ministry is considering the purchase of 96 used American fighters. Their modernization would have to take place in our country. If the plan is implemented, we will be amongst the forefront air forces NATO countries. This will also change our power in relation to Russia, where a key military doctrine is to gain advantage in the air.
ORAC is online now  
Old 12th Jan 2017, 11:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In addition to the 40+ Block 52 C/D's they already have, another 96 would make for quite a tidy fleet and maybe make retirement of the MiG-29 and SU-22's possible?

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2017, 12:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
Keep hearing a total fleet of circa 100 plus a sustainment margin, the size of which seems linked to final cost. MiG-29 to go as soon as possible but I've not heard of the planned demise of the SU-22 though, but can see the logic of it. The crews seem to have quite a soft-spot for the SU-22, so they may have to wrestle them from them. Not much love remaining for the MiG-29, to say the least.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2017, 15:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,853
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Why's that JTO? I wish nostalgia for aircraft types in the RAF was a key consideration, just think, Lightnings and Javelins operating alongside Phoons and Tonkas!

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2017, 16:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
I've no idea why the crews are so attached to the SU-22 but they seem happy enough every time the out-of-service date is pushed back a little.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2017, 18:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,853
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Could it be the old Jack of all Trades master of none argument? i.e. SU-22 is a better soil buster than the F-16 when all said and done?

Mind you I can see how more F-16s of any vintage is preferential to retaining a small number of Mig 29s, rather like the German story with their Migs.

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2017, 21:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
retaining a small number of Mig 29s, rather like the German story with their Migs.
It became a Polish story with their MiG's,the Germans donated the entire fleet to Poland for 1 euro.
peter we is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2017, 09:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Finningley Boy
Could it be the old Jack of all Trades master of none argument? i.e. SU-22 is a better soil buster than the F-16 when all said and done?



FB
Depends how you rework them.
glad rag is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2017, 10:31
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bury St. Edmunds
Age: 64
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder what kind of deal SAAB might be willing to do to offer Poland surplus early generation JAS 39 C/D Griphens as it plans to replace its early purchase with new generation E/F's.


I appreciate that Poland is an existing F16 operator and that may sway their thinking but the Griphen is a worthy competing option as I suspect that any ex USAF F16's will have been worked hard and that the Griphen fleet that Sweden may have to sell will have a relatively quiet life on mainly domestic Air Defence duties/sortie profiles.


MB
Madbob is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2017, 10:48
  #10 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,368
Received 1,568 Likes on 714 Posts
I suspect that, given the increased perceived threat, and if they come from mothballed USAF airframes, they wont be paying much, if anything, for them.
ORAC is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2017, 11:47
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
The F-16 is a very good fit for Polish needs with a vast array of weapon clearances with a clear development path and predictable maintenance & sustainment costs. That they are relatively cheap will not upset the bean-counters and as mentioned above you can expect quite a lot of political good will from the USG.

Whilst Typhoon and Gripen are highly capable aircraft don't underestimate the advantages of buying into such a large F-16 community and the speed at which the USAF system can train a few squadrons worth of pilots and maintainers. Of course, when your requirements can be satisfied with secondhand aircraft there are very few aircraft types out there that you can rapidly buy around 100 aircraft - the Typhoon and Gripen fleets just do not have that number of spare aircraft kicking around.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2017, 15:10
  #12 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,368
Received 1,568 Likes on 714 Posts
165 x F-16C and 15 x F-16D currently in storage at AMARC.
ORAC is online now  
Old 13th Jan 2017, 22:53
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: liverpool uk
Age: 67
Posts: 1,338
Received 16 Likes on 5 Posts
I wonder what kind of deal SAAB might be willing to do to offer Poland surplus early generation JAS 39 C/D Griphens as it plans to replace its early purchase with new generation E/F's
I suspect with all the present tensions the Swede's will want to keep them themselves.
air pig is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 08:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Here and there. Here at the moment but soon I'll be there.
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
165 x F-16C and 15 x F-16D currently in storage at AMARC.
A large number of those airframes have been earmarked for the QF-16 drone program.
SkyHawk-N is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 08:53
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Clipperton island
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
given the increased perceived threat
"perceived" is the important word. It's true that so many terror attacks have been performed in the European streets by that "perceived" , so many invaders come through the Mediterranean originate from this "perceived" , so many religious buildings are from that "perceived" origin, so many schools and suburbs are currently invaded all across Europe by this "perceived" ....

Might be that it all could change within a couple of weeks - just a hint.
recceguy is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 13:32
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
Perceived is a rather generous term given the near-perpetual conflicts Russia has found itself in whilst trying to exercise control of its self-appointed sphere since 1991. The only bit of variety has been Russia shelling itself in 1993 and the new habit of deploying military units with no insignia and denying all responsibility for them until the conflict is over. Not exactly abiding by the rules of war, international law or a brace of conventions is it?
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 21:25
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,399
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by SkyHawk-N
A large number of those airframes have been earmarked for the QF-16 drone program.
My understanding is those airframes are also basically out of cycles and would require major structural upgrades before they'd be suitable for air combat.
By the time they're done with the needed structural mods and updating to 21st century avionics, it's difficult to see much cost savings vs. buying the rights and building new aircraft under license...
tdracer is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.