Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New A400M variant delivered to German air force

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New A400M variant delivered to German air force

Old 13th Dec 2016, 12:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,372
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
New A400M variant delivered to German air force

Article & picture on Flight Global

Snip:-
The German air force has received its sixth Airbus Defence & Space A400M transport, featuring a new baseline tactical configuration to allow the aircraft to operate in more contested environments.

Airbus has incorporated a number of upgrades onto Berlin’s latest example, including the ability to operate from unprepared grass runways, act as an aerial refuelling tanker, and take off in temperatures of up to 55°C (131°F).

In addition, the A400M's defensive aids system has been improved, extra air-drop cargo and paratrooping capabilities have been added, and the aircraft can now operate at heights as low as 150ft above the ground in daylight and 300ft at night.
Any likelihood that our fleet be retrofitted with the upgrades?
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2016, 15:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Between Oxon and somewhere else
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, the UK retrofit program has been running for months and a second program is already planned to take them further still.
Winchweight is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2016, 19:06
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,372
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
Thanks. Good to know.
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2016, 21:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They just need a parliament that will let them use it as intended now.
Bigbux is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2016, 09:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: one side of la Manche
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
AAR?

LLad asked: Any likelihood that our fleet be retrofitted with the upgrades?

Winchy replied: Yes, .........



Winchy

Does that "yes" include the AAR bit? Or does 'ability to .... act as an aerial refuelling tanker' merely mean 'potential' ie fitted for but not with?

Regards
Batco
BATCO is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2016, 10:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,056
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
fitted for but not with?
I think if you're caught even thinking AAR in relation to the Brit A400s, you have to pay bucket loads of corkage to AirTanker (Dispensing, that is - not receiving)

LFH

.................
Lordflasheart is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2016, 10:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Between Oxon and somewhere else
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All the essential plumbing is present on all A400Ms, but the UK did not buy the AAR role fit items - pods, additional tanks etc, as they felt they already had sufficient capability with existing platforms, so fitted for, not with...
Winchweight is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2016, 11:10
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: -
Age: 54
Posts: 238
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Winchweight
All the essential plumbing is present on all A400Ms, but the UK did not buy the AAR role fit items - pods, additional tanks etc, as they felt they already had sufficient capability with existing platforms, so fitted for, not with...
The UK has an exclusive contract with the Airtanker consortium to provide AAR using Airbus A330 so there is no chance for any other aeroplane to be used for the task.
skydiver69 is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2016, 11:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 75' from the runway edge and 150' from the threshold
Age: 74
Posts: 247
Received 30 Likes on 12 Posts
And when Vlad decides that certain East European countries need to be in the Sovie.. oops! Russian sphere of influence, and the A330s are busy rushing politicians around and recovering tourists, and not being allowed to fly into areas deemed to risky to the Lloyds aircraft insurance syndicate and the board of directors, I'm sure that the Luftwaffe might let some of out Typhies have a suck. After all, other chaps have lent us a hand with their MPAs to chase the nasty Akulas away.

Last edited by ACW342; 14th Dec 2016 at 12:26.
ACW342 is online now  
Old 16th Dec 2016, 21:24
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm afraid some of the arguments above are a touch optimistic. Under the terms of the Airtanker contract we are not allowed to use any other asset to dispense AAR-they have exclusive rights. They wouldn't have proceeded with the contract if we hadn't agreed that concession.
FJ2ME is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2016, 03:46
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Commercial concerns preventing operational flexibility. Who signed for this?
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2016, 06:37
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 553
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Re Airtanker I would have thought that the next contract could be written such that some payment might be made to compensate them for losing out on N hours or litres of refuelling or however it is measured. If the amount is high enough I can't imagine them complaining. They could even pay for/provide the refuelling equipment and keep tabs on its use.
t43562 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2016, 21:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t43562
Re Airtanker I would have thought that the next contract could be written such that some payment might be made to compensate them for losing out on N hours or litres of refuelling or however it is measured. If the amount is high enough I can't imagine them complaining. They could even pay for/provide the refuelling equipment and keep tabs on its use.
Good point-bring it up in about 24years when the contract is up for renewal....
FJ2ME is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2016, 11:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,137
Received 95 Likes on 50 Posts
Back in the summer, LL started this

http://www.pprune.org/military-aviat...0-program.html

and recently they have ordered 5 C-130J predominantly in support of SF , to be delivered in 2021 time space

cheers
chopper2004 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2016, 11:39
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,067
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Those C-130 are not ordered yet just "politically" announced to be ordered one day. Plans call for operating them along french ones from a french base (with german crews) for easier maintenance and lower cost.
Less Hair is online now  
Old 19th Dec 2016, 11:44
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,137
Received 95 Likes on 50 Posts
Then again did see their A400M here at ILA below







chopper2004 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2016, 20:23
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you have to pay bucket loads of corkage to AirTanker
Just choked on my Windolene
Bigbux is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2016, 20:32
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Why does the A400 have an almost old fashioned black radome [puppy dog nose] vs. aircraft colour on just about every other grey camo type I can think of?
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2016, 20:42
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It really needs a 1960s "lightning" stripe along the sides.
Bigbux is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.