Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Halton to close

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Halton to close

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Dec 2016, 22:23
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GBP500M?

That's insane. With all the military camps closing, many of them ex-RAF to boot, I can't help feeling that this is a gold-plated solution to a non-problem.

Half a billion pounds? To implement basic training and professional development on an existing station that already does the same basic functions?

It would be cheaper to take say Dishforth, completely level it (say 10M) and build a spanking new camp (say another 100M).

Or completely gut Scampton and rebuild it.

Half a billion pounds? Really???
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2016, 22:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Threshold 06
Posts: 576
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
Ah, more short term expediency no doubt.

Someone will have achieved (allegedly) a nice little promotion on the back of these cost savings. The developers (probably `Defence Consultants` in another life - again allegedly) will make a nice little profit when the MoD throws money back at restructuring the remaining locations later. In the meantime the perpetrators of these wonderful `save to spend` schemes will have moved onwards and upwards and will probably be commuting between Whitehall offices and country estates using HS2, 3 or 4.

Or perhaps I am just being a bit cynical?
oldmansquipper is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2016, 22:54
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
£300-£400M is quite plausible.

Worthy Down cost £250M and that contract was awarded over 5 years ago: Worthy Down Barracks | Garrisons | Winchester-Garrison

Lyneham cost £230M and that was just the REME piece: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/d...army-engineers

£42M for a single hangar for A400Ms: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/a...f-brize-norton

£70M to build 322 families quarters: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/w...es-at-tidworth

£25M for demolition and then £142M for construction of the support building for F35 at Marham: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/m...-edge-aircraft

£20M to resurface just one runway at Valley: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/r...-at-raf-valley

16x SLAM Blocks costs £77M at Brize (that would be roughly the amount needed at Cranwell): https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...ic__Final_.pdf

£18M to renovate and build a new annex for 51 Sqn and RJ: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/h...raf-waddington

Welcome to the world of defence infrastructure and so-called 'value for money'.

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2016, 02:26
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's taking the piss, quite frankly.

42M for a shed?

This is being vastly overthought. A military barracks is not a complex build. A series of one or two story buildings to standard designs. If they can build 322 houses for GBP70M, I rest my case.

Notwithstanding the option of rebuilding Scampton.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2016, 06:18
  #25 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,371
Received 110 Likes on 77 Posts
" Half a billion pounds? "

Well in that case, with the above figure in mind, I am sure the cost of the closing down party for all those who were incarcerated in the place will have been included in the budget....
Krystal n chips is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2016, 14:57
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you mean some SURVIVED? That wasn't part of the plan.................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2016, 19:48
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
As I understand it, Halton is still owned by the Rothschilds and under the original lease agreement has to be handed back in its original condition.
Whopity is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2016, 20:28
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Out in the desert
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Whopity
As I understand it, Halton is still owned by the Rothschilds and under the original lease agreement has to be handed back in its original condition.
A bit like Wittering!!
Pegasus107 is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2016, 21:20
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having seen the way the military do airworthiness a shed costing £42m sounds like someone is cutting corners with he oversight.
A and C is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 04:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Leon Jabachjabicz
£300-£400M is quite plausible.

Worthy Down cost £250M and that contract was awarded over 5 years ago: Worthy Down Barracks | Garrisons | Winchester-Garrison

Lyneham cost £230M and that was just the REME piece: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/d...army-engineers

£42M for a single hangar for A400Ms: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/a...f-brize-norton

£70M to build 322 families quarters: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/w...es-at-tidworth

£25M for demolition and then £142M for construction of the support building for F35 at Marham: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/m...-edge-aircraft

£20M to resurface just one runway at Valley: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/r...-at-raf-valley

16x SLAM Blocks costs £77M at Brize (that would be roughly the amount needed at Cranwell): https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...ic__Final_.pdf

£18M to renovate and build a new annex for 51 Sqn and RJ: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/h...raf-waddington

Welcome to the world of defence infrastructure and so-called 'value for money'.

LJ
I have absolutely no liking of DIO, but given the examples LJ has listed above, does anyone have comparable costings for similar infrastructure projects?
Harley Quinn is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 05:26
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: one side of la Manche
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
HQ
Not recent but in 1997 a type 4 cost approx 39,000GBP to build (assuming MOD owned land etc already).

So, for project above, 322 x SFA for 70M = 217k per house.

Inflation? 'Accounting'?

Regards
Batco
BATCO is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 06:40
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Back in 1983, I was told that a cost assessment had been conducted, concerning the building of MQs at Ascension.

It was rejected due to the cost of £55K per unit. "How much?", asked someone who'd been involved.

"£55K"

"Well, that's interesting, because the actual figure we'd identified was £35K!"

Even then, there was some blatant nest-feathering going on, it would seem...
BEagle is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 08:04
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Halton - Rothschilds - so many different stories maybe someone should get the original documents out of the archives. No doubt the Rothschilds will have their copies to hand
Wander00 is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 08:05
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,814
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by Whopity
As I understand it, Halton is still owned by the Rothschilds and under the original lease agreement has to be handed back in its original condition.
Yes. I remember back in the '90s when No 1 SoTT was being moved to Cosford and the proposal was to give Halton to the local council but it was pointed out to MOD that the Rothschild agreement still stood.
Also applies to Odiham by the way;if ever MoD cease to 'need it' the land must be handed back to the original landowners.
chevvron is online now  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 08:08
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With such a large build at Cranwell. Taking planing, objections, lead time etc would it be practable to complete the work before Halton is due to close?
turbroprop is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 08:10
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Whopity/Chevvron - my understanding too (and Wyton btw) but would seem a good time for someone to check. 25 years ago there was an investment appraisal for Wyton that included ISTR several million pounds from selling off the airfield. AOC not impressed when Staish and I raised this issue, and suggested the appraisal was flawed
Wander00 is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2016, 11:44
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: God's Country
Posts: 139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Halton House

This has been answered many times before. This post by LJ 3 Oct 16;

That's an utter myth. On Alfred de Rothschild’s death in January 1918, his nephew Lionel inherited Halton House and it’s lands. The Air Board were keen to purchase the estate as an officer cadet college for the nacent Royal Air Force which had been formed on 1 April from an amalgamation of the Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Naval Air Service. Fortunately, Lionel was a willing seller, as the house was the distasteful equivalent of 'Beckingham Palace' in the 1900s and the estate including Halton House was purchased by the War Office in 1919 for £112,000 FREEHOLD. The was about a quarter of the probate value of the estate; clearly a bargain for the War Office (now MOD).
The Nip is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2016, 08:27
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aren't the workshops listed?

Recently the workshops have been evacuated because of safety/structural issues with the roof. Ironically I believe it's because of failings in the laticed and longspan roof. These were built in a unique way by Italian POWs in 1918, and why the building(s) is/are listed. But clearly not maintained properly.

As a private citizen the council would serve an enforcement notice if I let a listed building I was responsible for fall into disrepair and disuse. One rule for me, but another for HMG who can ignore this and sell up, allowing bulldozers to solve the problem? This I believe is/was the start of the 'excuse' to sell the site follwojng the airfield annohncement last June. Farbeit to suggest deliberate failure to maintain the site, giving the sale excuse, for that would be criminal. Lets settle for negligent then. Who's to blame?

On another point, Halton is the Deferred Facility safety site for nearby Chequers. If the PM needs security, Halton House is the first choice and its physical security reflects this. It's also used for press conferences such as POTUS visits. So can the Aylesbury Holiday Inn expect a booking in future?!

Emotional, yes. I was born at Halton, and so was my Mother, first ever birth at the former hospital in 1922. The history of the Halton estate and its contribution to UK defence is great and also historic and emotional. However this is about neither of those. This is about practicality, location, resources and why once sold, this site, close to London, with extensive possibilities, can never be rebought. Cash in the bank is all the bean counters of this generation understand.

Isn't it about time we heard the views of the Staish? Or is there a political silence in place.
Proman is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2016, 08:29
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But why does it have to be close to London?
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2016, 09:27
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: God's Country
Posts: 139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On another point, Halton is the Deferred Facility safety site for nearby Chequers. If the PM needs security, Halton House is the first choice and its physical security reflects this.

While there are better qualified people than me on this site, if there is one thing that isn't secure it is Halton. Not one part of the estate is secure from people walking around.

OTOH, HQ Air is now better, 1 site especially. Least you can't just walk through all the buildings.
The Nip is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.