Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

US Defense Secretary Selected

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

US Defense Secretary Selected

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Dec 2016, 14:25
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,201
Received 396 Likes on 246 Posts
Originally Posted by FlightlessParrot
But I thought the 7 year glitch had to be waived by Congress (? does it need a specific legislative act?), not just the normal Senate consent process?
Let me explain this to you: the term "against the law" is and was FALSE and that is why I responded.
Laws are rule sets. In this rule set, there is a general rule (the 7 year bit) but also a provision within the rule for a waiver request. Therefore, NOT against the law, but rather within the law since the provision for waiver is part and parcel to the rule set.
Was I being a bit nit picky? Yes, but the original statement was false and I felt it needed to be corrected.

I had a junior officer who left the service and was trying to get hired by a good sized defense firm. He'd been involved in some work with them previously so that regulations required that he not be hired by them for a six month waiting period unless he got a waiver. Per DoD regulations (which are derived from public law) we submitted a waiver package for him. (Over two dozen pages). We had hopes that the waiver would come through, but in the usual case of stamping down on those not of exalted rank, his waiver came back disapproved.
I then prepared a (30+ page) package, he and I worked on it together, to be sent to his Congressional representative and both State Senators, in hopes of getting an oversight query from Congress to DoD to appeal that ruling. However, once we had it all together (he had been interviewing with other companies as well) he came into my office before we got all of the signatures, dotted i's and crossed t's, and advised me that he'd not send in the packages to his elected representatives. He accepted that he'd gotten the beef job in the rectum, and chose to hire on with a different company. He was tired of fighting the ing system.
That experience was frustrating, educational, and useful. In my following job I had to answer a dozen Congressional inquires over various matters regarding people asking for appeals and waivers to regulations. Knowing what can go into such an appeal helped me staff the responses.

Last edited by Lonewolf_50; 7th Dec 2016 at 14:35.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2016, 19:43
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: No longer a hot and sandy place....but back to the UK for an indefinite period
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Suggest that anyone who hasn't previously heard of Mattis, check out his excellent interviews and talks on YouTube. He is well educated, understands the current world political situation and believes that a political solution needs to be found before going to war. He can also be tough when he needs to be.

I was impressed by the reading lists that he gives to various ranks in the Marine Corps.

A surprisingly good choice in my opinion.
Boy_From_Brazil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.