Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

BBMF Lancaster location

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

BBMF Lancaster location

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Oct 2016, 15:58
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,261
Received 644 Likes on 233 Posts
Well, I have been retired a long time so that modern research on cows' tails and the like has not registered.

On my last mass briefing at RAF Guetersloh [Lightnings 19 and 92, Hunters 2 and 4] the Staish thanked me, wished me well [posted Finningley] and then added "now we can stop adding 5000 feet to your contrail forecasts!"
langleybaston is online now  
Old 13th Oct 2016, 16:51
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,559
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
As for the ghost dog, is this the one reputed to have turned up for the unveiling ceremony for the Woodhall Spa memorial? I suppose one cannot tell with ghost dogs.

One of the local pubs has a ghost dog - it died after having its tail severed in an accident with the heavy pub door. The dog was buried but without its tail which was kept behind the bar as a grizzly souvenir for the visitors. Then, at midnight on the anniversary of the dogs death, an apparition appeared before the pub landlord who was locking up:
"Give me back my tail," said the Ghost, " I can't go to doggy heaven until I am whole again".
"Sorry," said the Landlord. "I'm not allowed to re-tail spirits after eleven o'clock"!
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2016, 22:48
  #23 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 419 Likes on 221 Posts
(Sorry, this has nothing to do with Lancasters, but ghost dogs?)

As a very young, pre-school child I remembered often seeing a brown and black haired dog which always lay under my maternal grandfather's chair when he sat in it. It was an Airedale Terrier. I always thought it strange that it never seemed to come out from under that chair but never asked about it at the time or wanted to go near it because I was scared of dogs.

Many years later, as an adult, I mentioned it in passing to my mother, who told me I couldn't have seen it because the dog (which was devoted to my grandfather and always lay under his chair) had died a long time before I was born. She was shocked and amazed that I knew it was an Airedale because it was never talked about.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 27th Oct 2016, 21:24
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,261
Received 644 Likes on 233 Posts
Debrief.

We had a great day on Monday, and spent 3 hours at East Kirkby which is every bit as good as has been said above. Thence to the Petwood for lunch [excellent and reasonably priced], granddaughter finished her meal with a chocolate brownie and cream ................ on to the Dam Buster Memorial, told her about the ghost dog, and then was talked into buying a chocolate brownie pastry "for later".
I took a load of photos and printed them for her to take home.

Just one question please: which variant of 0.5" gun tail turret is installed? It appears to be lacking some lower part, might that be Village Inn?

Once again, thank you.
langleybaston is online now  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 10:15
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somerset
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FN82 with two 0.50s.
Lynxman is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 10:22
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was the .50 a massive improvement on the .303 arrangement ??, it didn't last long as postwar the RAF quickly went to 20mm cannon in their turrets.

Which generates a second question - was the .50 a slower rate of fire than the .303 and were both of them faster than the 20mm ??

And gun sights - was the turret gun sight standard 'iron sight' arrangement, or a reflector sight or a gyro gun sight of some type ??

Any expert on here know ??

Arc
Arclite01 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 10:45
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North of Watford, South of Watford Gap
Age: 68
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Arclite

I'm no expert, but I believe the .303's rate of fire was higher than the .5, which in turn was faster than the 20mm. Turrets were fitted with reflector sights, and possibly gyro by the end of the war.
Innominate is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 15:01
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Forest of Dean
Posts: 199
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
The problem with the .303 cal machine guns was the limited kinetic effect they had on impact with the target. .5 cal rounds were more effective and 20mm rounds even more destructive.

A good discussion on weapons effectiveness is at:

http://spitfiresite.com/2010/04/cann...ntroversy.html
izod tester is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 17:01
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Near the watter...
Age: 77
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The "Village Inn" referred to by Langleybaston in post 24 above was an automatic gunlaying system....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automa...-Laying_Turret

There was a lot of electronics in Lancasters by the end of the war.
Molemot is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 09:11
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Kent, UK.
Posts: 370
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
There is a project underway to return NX611 to flight...
mmitch
mmitch is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 21:40
  #31 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,261
Received 644 Likes on 233 Posts
Thanks for the above. The turret appears to be missing some structure low-down, as if a part or parts had been removed. That is what made me wonder about Village Inn, which had a substantial radar dome.
langleybaston is online now  
Old 30th Oct 2016, 11:39
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,559
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
I think that I may be in a minority of one, but is it a good idea to get Just Jane back into the air at the moment? We already have a flying Lancaster in the Country, and surely it would make sense to keep Jane for future upgrade should anything happen to the BBMF Lanc.


Secondly, Jane makes a great deal of money for the Lincolnshire Aviation Heritage Centre at East Kirkby...if she is airworthy again, then will she stay at East Kirkby, or will she have to move to another airfield? ...I don't see the sense in flying a valuable Lancaster off a short grass airstrip. She currently has treaded tyres which would throw much rubbish into the undercarriage bay during take-off and landing, and the smooth early tyres are no longer available. Even if she does fly from East Kirkby, then public access to her must be affected. Taxi rides must surely be followed by full FOD checks for loose articles that may have been dropped by the paying public? Its one thing to ask customers to remove all loose items from pockets etc, but like the use of mobile phones in the Cinema, there's always some bright spark who knows better. The result must surely be a very limited public access on the ground when compared to current access. Perhaps the plan is to fly paying members of the public to help funding? Well good look with the CAA if that is tried.


My bottom line - as much as my heart says that getting a second Lancaster into flying condition is a good thing, my head says that perhaps now is not the best time to do it.
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2016, 10:58
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Kent, UK.
Posts: 370
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
There is room for a runway at the museum. A Dakota operates from the shorter grass runway at the moment.
mmitch.
mmitch is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2016, 11:25
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,559
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
There is room for a runway at the museum
.


Waddington's new concrete runway has cost in the region of £35M. I still don't think that it is worth risking a Lancaster on grass!
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2016, 11:53
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually I find taildraggers easier off the grass................

I don't think they would operate her regularly from EK anyway. I do have a lot of sympathy with the earlier post from Wensleydale.

Arc
Arclite01 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2016, 20:30
  #36 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Apparently the maintenance to flight requires many parts to be remanufactured so it will not be a quick job.

Shame about the runway, it was resurfaced around 1964, was 6,500 feet, and one of two emergency landing grounds, I think Ha'penny Green was the other.
Pontius Navigator is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.