Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Time appears to be running out for the Belfast in Oz

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Time appears to be running out for the Belfast in Oz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Sep 2016, 19:35
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Devon
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Al Richey
It was used as a cheap testbed for the Trident. Once the trials were complete it was not allowed to be used as it was deemed too expensive to maintain. However, I remember a couple of occasions.........
Only a couple? It worked fine...........
hirsute is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2016, 20:02
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,845 Likes on 1,215 Posts
1965 the RAF could afford 2 Britannias for 2 weeks to take the two senior entries to the USA, 3 days in Washington, Gp Capt Leonard Trent VC was Air Attache, a week at the Air Force Academy, and best part of 3 days in New York, where the RAF rep had put us about 6 to a room in the Governor Clinton Hotel so we had the bulk of out Rate 1s to spend on "entertainment"! How times have changed.
Off topic, but a couple of RAF guys I knew managed to wangle a trip with the Services to Mexico to see the Aztec ruins, the plan was to fly them VC10 to Belize then on to Mexico by other means, the planned aircraft was cancelled so they were offered an alternate, the RAF would fly them on the Dulles to Washington the weeks before and then provide them with Greyhound coach tickets and hotels etc to "tour" the USA on the way to Mexico, they said it was better than seeing the ruins.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2016, 08:00
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Although I worked on Brits, for some reason, which escapes me, I was given the task of carrying out a turn round service on a Belfast. On the flight deck I recall there was a set of tapes which one inserted into a slot. A female voice then talked one through the various checks. Was that unique to the Belfast or was it a feature on other 'modern' aircraft?
I also knew a Flt Eng. who still flew in them when he was 60 odd. He loved them!
goudie is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2017, 11:38
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The end is nigh for "Hector"....
Short Belfast status - Cairns Airport - Updated to Feb 2017
Stratofreighter is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2017, 17:40
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I hope it doesn't happen but I suspect it will.

I shall be in mourning for the rest of the year.

Silly Old Hector was the most eccentric of our 10 Belfasts. It used to said that if she did not have a wet nose, then we should not go flying.

I have a wonderful oil painting of Hector hanging in pride of place in my lounge.

RIP Old Friend.
JW411 is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2017, 22:29
  #26 (permalink)  
ICM
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bishops Stortford, UK
Age: 82
Posts: 469
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
There has been a certain inevitability about this. Farewell, indeed - and we have to be thankful that XR 371 is comfortably under cover at Cosford.
ICM is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2017, 11:15
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Deepest Lincs
Age: 75
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember a Belslow visiting RAF Guetersloh in circa '74. a visiting American said to a mover 'Gee but that's a big plane!' the mover replied (yes a mover) ' You should have seen the thing that brought it in'. Who says movers are humourless?
Motleycallsign is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2017, 12:50
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In a van down by the river
Posts: 706
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Would it be fair to compare it to a Hercules - or is the Belfast really a strategic vs. a tactical lifter ?
Fonsini is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2017, 13:49
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,708
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Yes, better compared to how the RAF employ the C17
Davef68 is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2017, 17:11
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
One of my friends (who had flown both) used to say that the Belfast was like their C-133 only our one worked.
JW411 is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2017, 18:23
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,062
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
One of my friends (who had flown both) used to say that the Belfast was like their C-133 only our one worked.

Yes, with 10 lost (one in a ground fire) out of 50 built gets into some fighter loss percentages. If you ever get a chance to go to the museum in Dover, Delaware, USA, the C-133 is often open, or the docents are happy to open her up. Great museum especially if you love trash haulers. The cockpit is truly like sitting on a sofa in a greenhouse. The docents are instructed not to bring up the losses unless a guest brings it up. If you do bring it up they are happy to talk about it and you can clearly see the doubler plates and strapping bands that were put in place in the forward fuselage by the cargo door and overhead. Fascinating to see from an engineering side. Many surmise some of the early unexplained losses may have been due to crack propagation, but as the losses were over water this evidence was lacking. One of the final crashes showed the cracking.


The crews also commented that the flight engineer would keep his hand close to the large fuel dump lever by his right hand as an engine loss on takeoff was considered catastrophic.


Otherwise when she wasn't crashing the crews seemed to like her....
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2017, 14:32
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 113
Received 26 Likes on 6 Posts
JW411 - was Hector the airframe that had the grey rexine communications system fitted?
bspatz is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2017, 16:53
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at one of the shots in that thread, have I hit this right? Were the rows of seats fitted rearward facing on the ramp, which were then occupied before the ramp was then raised?
Al R is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2017, 17:25
  #34 (permalink)  
ImageGear
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
All of the Belfast aircraft I travelled in had the seats on the ramp facing rearwards. I have no recollection whatsoever of the ramp being down when boarding, it was always raised.

One of our RAF team had an absolute phobia of flying???, and his fingers sometimes had to be prised off the arm rests after landing.

He managed to secretly consume large quantities of sedative tablets before and during flight and he was invariably semi-comatose for much of the time.

On a trip from the UK to Belize around 1972 via Keflavik, Gander, Nassau and Belize he was a shivering wreck. Never stopped him going though.

Would never happen today
 
Old 1st Mar 2017, 19:04
  #35 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,400
Received 1,590 Likes on 727 Posts
So, did they dice it?
ORAC is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2017, 21:42
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 113
Received 26 Likes on 6 Posts
Al R yes if the stub deck was not fitted it was normal to fit seats on the ramp to comply with the requirement for pax to sit behind freight. There were special 'cheese plate' adapters that were fitted to keep the seats level. Not the most comfortable way to travel as there were no windows and the ramp could shimmy about during landings which was a bit uncomfortable particularly without any visual reference.
bspatz is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2017, 01:29
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Perhaps they could start a museum with it? Seems a shame to just scrap it; especially as someone was looking after it!
Out Of Trim is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2017, 08:16
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.. thanks for the replies. I wondered about the angle and the inner ear havoc at play.

What a shame if it goes.
Al R is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2017, 11:39
  #39 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,845 Likes on 1,215 Posts
It will be, it looks like someone is looking after her

No Cookies | The Cairns Post
NutLoose is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2017, 12:20
  #40 (permalink)  
ICM
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bishops Stortford, UK
Age: 82
Posts: 469
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
But that link dates from September last year, so we can presumably take it that the Court case has run its course and, if the Aviation Forum posting is correct, that breaking up will now have started?
ICM is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.