End of the F16?
Thread Starter
End of the F16?
There's an article over on Flight Global about the F16 production line drawing to a close:
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...h-goin-423293/
It strikes me that losing the capability to manufacture such a useful aircraft in large numbers isn't exactly a good idea. I know that there's 'replacements' like F35 slowly coming along, but they're never going to be affordable in quantity like F16s are.
Sometimes you just need a lot of something that get jobs done. F16 fits in this category, so does B52, A10, Harrier?, Hercules, etc.
For example, I noticed that when the USA started getting involved in counter-ISIS airstrikes they sent along one of everything (F22 dropping bomblets on ISIS? Why's that platform necessary for that job?!). But from what I hear it's the large number of F16s that were doing the vast volume of the work, and probably a bunch of F18s too.
Thoughts, ladies and gentlemen?
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/ar...h-goin-423293/
It strikes me that losing the capability to manufacture such a useful aircraft in large numbers isn't exactly a good idea. I know that there's 'replacements' like F35 slowly coming along, but they're never going to be affordable in quantity like F16s are.
Sometimes you just need a lot of something that get jobs done. F16 fits in this category, so does B52, A10, Harrier?, Hercules, etc.
For example, I noticed that when the USA started getting involved in counter-ISIS airstrikes they sent along one of everything (F22 dropping bomblets on ISIS? Why's that platform necessary for that job?!). But from what I hear it's the large number of F16s that were doing the vast volume of the work, and probably a bunch of F18s too.
Thoughts, ladies and gentlemen?
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Did I Tell You I Was A Harrier Pilot
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
They were only being built for foreign sales. If you're going to try to sell an ice-cream van to your customers for the school run, better not have a small hatchback on your forecourts at the same time.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I noticed that when the USA started getting involved in counter-ISIS airstrikes they sent along one of everything (F22 dropping bomblets on ISIS? Why's that platform necessary for that job?!)
Not to worry. Lockmart has a very good marketing department and will no doubt sell a few more airframes to keep the line open, even if they have to bribe someone silly to do so (cf. F-104, L-1011, ...).
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Keep in mind the F-22 is also an electron vacuum cleaner. The F-22 was used to get a good handle on the electronic order of battle in the region, which includes Turkish and Syrian ground radar systems, and Russian ground and ship borne radar systems. It was not just about bomblets.
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unlike, say BAe or its forerunners (Lighting, Typhoon....)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does anybody on here honestly think that anything is sold to anybody in the middle east, Africa and many other parts of the world without backhanders?
I think people need to grow up a bit/a lot.
If you want to be an international conglomerate, you oil the wheels. People may have got better at hiding it, but it is there and always will be. The only difference between a bribe and commission is timing.
Countries need their arms manufacturing base, and they need foreign sales. They also need the soft power the sales bring.
I'm a firm believer that inside our own countries we should do everything in our power to stamp out corruption, but when in Rome......
Pursuing a corruption case against your only powerful Arms manufacturer which would also alienate the biggest buyer in the world of our goods whilst driving your defence infrastructure out of business is moronic.
Why not just shoot yourself in the foot?
I think people need to grow up a bit/a lot.
If you want to be an international conglomerate, you oil the wheels. People may have got better at hiding it, but it is there and always will be. The only difference between a bribe and commission is timing.
Countries need their arms manufacturing base, and they need foreign sales. They also need the soft power the sales bring.
I'm a firm believer that inside our own countries we should do everything in our power to stamp out corruption, but when in Rome......
Pursuing a corruption case against your only powerful Arms manufacturer which would also alienate the biggest buyer in the world of our goods whilst driving your defence infrastructure out of business is moronic.
Why not just shoot yourself in the foot?
