Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Red Arrows issue warning after training session stopped by fans taking photos

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Red Arrows issue warning after training session stopped by fans taking photos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jan 2016, 09:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,375
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Red Arrows issue warning after training session stopped by fans taking photos

On today's online Telegraph:-

A message on their Facebook page said people were standing on the runway, endangering themselves and others.
It said: "We are very honoured that so many people enjoy coming to RAF Scampton to watch the Red Arrows train and we do truly enjoy seeing the photographs that are taken every day. But it has come to the point where people are taking unnecessary risks to get those photographs. On Friday, air traffic control had to stop our pilots performing circuits as there were people on the centreline of each runway, directly under the flight paths of the aircraft taking off and landing. By doing so, people are endangering themselves and others and ATC had no choice but to stop us, thereby curtailing crucial training for our pilots."
Actually on the runway??? If so, how on earth did they get there? Or standing in the undershoot outside the airfield boundary?
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 09:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,921
Received 2,842 Likes on 1,213 Posts
What a load of over the top bollox.... go tell that to the people living under the approach to Heathrow, Gatwick etc etc, please move out of your house as we are flying today..
NutLoose is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 10:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Deepest darkest London
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nutloose

I think what they mean is that they are doing what the great unwashed did on the A15 at Waddington during the airshows. ie Standing right under the fence on approach at the opposite end from the A15

As a half Lincolnshire native, and having been to both ends of the base I can see where the problem is. But I don't think its so much the regular spotter/photographers, more likely its the none regulars who are not so wise..... Or rather are lacking in the having a clue dept

The farmer at the A15 end is probably fed up as well due to some folk trampling his crops in the summer months.

V1

Last edited by Valiantone; 20th Jan 2016 at 11:11.
Valiantone is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 10:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Up There!!!
Age: 61
Posts: 439
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I've seen people standing under the approach at both ends of the runways outside the boundaries at RAF Coningsby, Lossiemouth Waddington & Leakenheath to get thier photos, they are much nearer the runway thresholds at these bases than you can get at Scampton, never seen a missed approach or a suspension of flying from these bases due to enthusiasts on the runway centreline outside the boundaries!
If there is an issue with people on private land outside Scampton then that is up to locals to deal with it, but bit ott missed approach on that reason!
7of9 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 11:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,234
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
These days there is a by-law that prevents public access to the field at the 27 end of Yeovilton's runway around airshow weekend, but when I last went there, about five or six years ago, there were a good many enthusiasts happily taking photos until the local constabulary arrived. Suddenly everybody was moved back to the other side of the public footpath that runs through the field, and the police remained to enforce it.

While they were stopping anyone else it was okay for them to stand directly under the centreline and take snaps with their camera phones of aircraft on finals. Anyone else who approached was immediately sent back to the naughty step. To this day I am still not sure how they would survive an F-16 dropping on top of them in a way that none of the rest of us would.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 11:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Peterborough
Age: 70
Posts: 259
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Martin.

Or a C-160!!!
Plane spotting enthusiasts come within inches of death after military aircraft misses runway | Daily Mail Online
uffington sb is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 12:13
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Nutty:
"What a load of over the top bollox"


Except when the Nimrod AEW dragged its 150ft trailing wire aerial across the A15 a good few years ago at Waddington, and the Vulcan Tanker that did the same a couple of years earlier (Hope the photo shows). I suppose that it is fine for the spotters to take their risks, but they have little consideration for the aircrew in the aircraft that hits them!


Wensleydale is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 12:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Kent, UK.
Posts: 370
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Some of them will put up ladders so they can be taller than the fencing...
mmitch.
mmitch is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 12:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,807
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
The 'Russian spy' would often park on the old part of Ermine Street next to Scampton to watch the comings and going. Actually, he was just some innocent chap who liked watching aircraft whilst having his lunch, but was always known as the spy!

At Brize, spotters would often stand right next to the fence on the RW centreline. Fortunately, part of VC10 conversion training was a late go-around simulating action taken for a runway incursion - timed to perfection, an asymmetric 3-engine go-around with full power would mean that much noise, smoke and fury would greet the s just as we crossed the fence advertising the price of freedom.....
BEagle is online now  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 14:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,921
Received 2,842 Likes on 1,213 Posts
Then there were the civi police at Brize that phoned us up several days after the event to tell us they had caught some chap taking potshots at the VC10's on finals with his air rifle and would it be of any interest to us..

They coudn't even be time specific and it resulted in us checking the whole fleet, some of which were down route


Except it was neither of them Wenslydale, but a Hawk, dragging nothing but the pilot through the air.

So come WW3 when we launch our unarmed submarines, deploy out aircraftless Carriers, all the Russians need to do is deploy a few dozen spotters onto the thresholds and the RAF will also cease to operate also... God bless the Army... unless they lose their ammo under Health and Safety Left wing lunacy.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 15:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside the Fence
Age: 71
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Sounds as though someone is being a bit precious.

If the public are off the airfield it is up to the pilot not ATC to decide whether to continue the approach. I assume that the Reds do not often land short of the runway, so the risk is low.

If these people choose to ignore clear signs stating the potential danger, it is their decision. Clearly, if their actions distract the pilot, an overshoot should be initiated.

I do remember the good old days at Valley when ATC would request one of the 3 Sqn Hunters to move the spotters from the fence or rock outcrop on the RW14 approach. With students doing PFLs and 1in1s the undershoot was definitely not a safe place to be!
Dominator2 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 17:04
  #12 (permalink)  
Danny42C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Move along, now.


Dominator2
,

My Post (p.188 #3753 on "Pilot's Brevet").....Great Minds...?
...Half way round, something strikes me as odd. Prewar, there had been a small road running close to that side of the boundary. The runway was extended during the war, a section of the road was closed off, and had been incorporated into the new taxiway. Post war, the road had been reinstated, some 200 ft of the runway had been cut off with an angle-iron and wire fence across. (The useless stub of runway and its verges were a popular picnic spot for the locals; there they could watch the flying as they scoffed their sandwiches..
Perhaps I should have added that, in those rather more robust days (1951), that when the goofers were getting hard up against the fence, and on the centreline, ATC would ask anyone in circuit to "shift 'em !" (we complied with the greatest of pleasure).

Couldn't do that now. Oh dear, no.

Danny42C

,

Last edited by Danny42C; 20th Jan 2016 at 17:06. Reason: Correct spacing
 
Old 20th Jan 2016, 17:14
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,921
Received 2,842 Likes on 1,213 Posts

If the public are off the airfield it is up to the pilot not ATC to decide whether to continue the approach. I assume that the Reds do not often land short of the runway, so the risk is low.
Actually you'd probably be more in danger standing in ATC's carpark next to the tower..




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-RAF-base.html
NutLoose is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2016, 18:25
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Recollect calibrating the ILS at an RAFG station.
On one of our runs we noted that a group of picnickers had ensconced themselves by the perimeter right under the approach.
For the next approach someone filled a washbasin and, on cue, pulled the plug.
The picnickers clearly put two and two together and got a #1 because, on the next run, they were gone.
What rotters bored RAF crew can be
Basil is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 04:45
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Taif-Saudi Arabia
Age: 64
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think one consideration may be the length of the overshoot area in the event of a high speed barrier engagement. The eastern end is quite short and I,m not sure if the Mk 12 Barrier would stop it before the fence.
AGS Man is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 07:33
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dead Dog Land
Age: 77
Posts: 531
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
A few months ago there was a thread about the future of the Waddington airshow. One of the alternatives mentioned was Scampton and, being a Scampton village resident, I posted about it's unsuitability and the number of naughty areas on the West side. There is a perfectly adequate view point at the junction of the B1398 and the A1500 but this is not good enough for some people. A couple of hundred yards from the view point there is a farm track leading to the airfield perimeter fence and in the past, some people would drive up this track, park, and stand at the fence which put them on the approach and after the start of the lights. This track was gated, but what happens now is that these same loons half park on the grass verge, climb over the gate and stand by the fence. If anything, this is worse as the half parking restricts other traffic on the B1398.


Red Arrows precious? maybe, because the main attraction last Friday was a Spitfire, presumably BBMF, which was in circuit for most of the day, most welcome and nice to see.


Excuse the thread drift, but the Spitfire was still in circuit at dusk and in half light conditions, any reason for this? It just seems a bit of a risk to me.
The Oberon is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 07:55
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The anti spotter vitriol and stories of how the skygods would conspire to punish them is a sad reflection on some people.
I always feel I have been lucky to have been given the opportunities I have had.
Not everyone has had the opportunity to get an education such that they could join the service as aircrew, or underake civilian pilot training. Many would have loved to have the life many here have had, and just want to look at aircraft out of fascination for something we have.
I realise those here have had to make considerable individual effort in addition to luck, and some have had little opportunity other than their own effort, but most of us have also had opportunities denied to some others. Being forced by circumstance outside your control to leave school early and work in a more mundane job when you have dreamed of flying does happen.
I cringe a bit when people lambast annoraks or spotters in a smug way.

Last edited by rjtjrt; 21st Jan 2016 at 08:32. Reason: Typo
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 08:27
  #18 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Spotters are not lambasted for fun.

Runway approach lights used to be mounted on stout telegraph poles. Boundary fences were also robust. Today we have frangible approach lights and the boundary fences at the thresholds are similarly weakened as landing short or over running, while rare, is always a risk.

Man in white van or on a ladder creates an additional hazard to life and limb should the aircraft have a mishap. It is not just directly on the threshold either but in a fan from the touchdown point.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 08:31
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree, if a safety hazard they should be firmly but politely moved.
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2016, 08:37
  #20 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
I think that this 'having a go at the public', signals a beginning to the end.
Will questioning their purpose in this day and age have a bit more oomph, especially with this 'get orf moi land' attitude?

RAF Red Arrows - FAQs
What is the purpose of the Red Arrows?

The official name of the Team is the ‘Royal Air Force Aerobatic Team’, commonly known as the ‘Red Arrows’. The Red Arrows are a small part of a large organisation; the Royal Air Force, much of which is engaged in operations overseas defending UK interests and making the world a safer place.

The Red Arrows are the public face of the Royal Air Force and are acknowledged as one of the world’s premier aerobatic teams. Within the UK, the Red Arrows exist to demonstrate the professional excellence of the Royal Air Force and promote recruitment to the Royal Air Force. The Red Arrows have inspired a significant number of people to join the Royal Air Force, both as officers and airmen in all trades, not just pilots!

The Team supports wider British interests overseas by contributing to Defence Diplomacy efforts and promoting British industry. The Hawk aircraft flown by the Team and most of its components are all British made. During international tours the Red Arrows demonstrate both British skill and British technology to millions of people.

The Red Arrows also help more than 500 UK charities every year - contributing many thousands of pounds to a wide variety of important causes.

Seen at RAF Scampton golf course;

SilsoeSid is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.