CHINOOK SUPPORT TO FLOOD VICTIMS
Thread Starter
CHINOOK SUPPORT TO FLOOD VICTIMS
Saw a Chinook on BBC supporting the flood victims in Yorkshire/Cumbria, was wondering does operating low level over water raise any particular challenges to a Chinook crew.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Erewhon
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nothwithstanding it's Christmas/New Year, it must be nice for the 'boys' to be operating over friendly airspace . . . .
Having got affected relatives in York - thank you to all our Armed Services and the Civil authorities involved.
Having got affected relatives in York - thank you to all our Armed Services and the Civil authorities involved.
Will someone tell Kay Burley form SKY news that the big green thing belongs to the Royal Air Force not the Army.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Just watched a clip on BBC News website of a Chinook delivering supplies to the Foss bridge. The clip was taken from a platform initially above and slightly behind the Chinook and later from above the stbd side. There is no indication of whether the footage was taken from another helicopter or a drone. If it was a drone, surely this posed a potential risk to the Chinook as it was outside the pilots view. Any thoughts?
http://http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35189262
http://http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35189262
Last edited by izod tester; 28th Dec 2015 at 16:48. Reason: To add link
Resident insomniac
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Having watched that BBC Video, I would say it was 'filmed' by a professional media crew from a helicopter - there is sound and the panning is smooth and 'centred' (although drones are approaching those standards).
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Watching it from afar, online and the like, I thought the national response looks a bit of a shambles. Almost overwhelming, in fact. Granted its a holiday period and its Winter and its Britain. But it looks an utter shambles.
One gets the impression the poor Army are getting their PPE bit by bit. First of all they were simply in combat uniform and getting very wet up to their armpits. Then they eventually got some sort of waders or wellies (some of them).Then they got hi-viz jackets. Lately 9today in fact) they've been wearing what looks like maritime issue rigid life-jackets (for meeting the PM in)?
It doesn't look good. We should seriously reflect on where we keep getting things so badly wrong. This weather started like over a week ago?
Maybe 1 x Chinook flying into a flooded UK suburb and dropping something off is regarded as a success in itself these days? I feel for the young soldiers involved, I really do. They must be beginning to wonder what they are taking part in? The biggest cluster-**** for many years? I'm not trying to be cruel, just observing as I see it.
One gets the impression the poor Army are getting their PPE bit by bit. First of all they were simply in combat uniform and getting very wet up to their armpits. Then they eventually got some sort of waders or wellies (some of them).Then they got hi-viz jackets. Lately 9today in fact) they've been wearing what looks like maritime issue rigid life-jackets (for meeting the PM in)?
It doesn't look good. We should seriously reflect on where we keep getting things so badly wrong. This weather started like over a week ago?
Maybe 1 x Chinook flying into a flooded UK suburb and dropping something off is regarded as a success in itself these days? I feel for the young soldiers involved, I really do. They must be beginning to wonder what they are taking part in? The biggest cluster-**** for many years? I'm not trying to be cruel, just observing as I see it.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hiq et Ubique
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAF support helicopters operate under Army control. JHC reports to Army HQ, and is presently commanded by a Maj Gen.
But they do have the RAF logo on them.
But they do have the RAF logo on them.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
It's something of a no-win situation. If the Army are under general obligation to help the civil communities with things like flood defence (i.e. a MACC task), then of course the Army should hold the appropriate equipment (eg waders, boats etc). But you can't issue every soldier with a set of waders on the basis that sometime in his career he might be required to help in flood defence.
A central pool makes sense. The kit has to be dispatched from Donnington or wherever (Poole RNLI?) to where the issue is. Which of course takes time, and perhaps there are conflicting high priority demands for the same stores.
If the Police ever broke their no-strike law and went on strike, no doubt the Army would be called upon. But they don't have stab vests or handcuffs. I think a pick helve would do well as an ersatz truncheon though.
You're right, it's a mess, but not a mess that's easy to plan for.
A central pool makes sense. The kit has to be dispatched from Donnington or wherever (Poole RNLI?) to where the issue is. Which of course takes time, and perhaps there are conflicting high priority demands for the same stores.
If the Police ever broke their no-strike law and went on strike, no doubt the Army would be called upon. But they don't have stab vests or handcuffs. I think a pick helve would do well as an ersatz truncheon though.
You're right, it's a mess, but not a mess that's easy to plan for.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Just west of the North Sea
Age: 69
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would have to be a very sophisticated drone and hugely talented operator to get remote shots like that in the BBC vid. Stabilised mounted camera from a helo at CAA legal minimums is my guess.
Originally Posted by Roadster
If the Police ever broke their no-strike law and went on strike, no doubt the Army would be called upon. But they don't have stab vests or handcuffs. I think a pick helve would do well as an ersatz truncheon though.
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
A single Chinook dropping sandbags while enthusiastic, but largely clueless, squaddies take the poor saps on boat rides through the streets as their properties and livelihoods are destroyed around them. This tells you everything you need to know about this Government's response to the devastating annual floods and how much action has gone in to countering the threat. Never mind all this North versus South bollocks, this is the epitome of Civil preparedness at its absolute worst.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
A lot of people wise after the event.......media, opposition politicians, ppruners etc! Easy to criticise afterwards. Not nearly so easy to foresee, plan for [and pay for] appropriate responses to natural disasters of an unprecedented scale.
Anybody who has ever had to deal with such disasters will explain the almost impossibility of beating nature.....IMHO.
Well done to all those involved in the rescue and recovery.
H49
Anybody who has ever had to deal with such disasters will explain the almost impossibility of beating nature.....IMHO.
Well done to all those involved in the rescue and recovery.
H49
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: North West UK
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just watched a clip on BBC News website of a Chinook delivering supplies to the Foss bridge. The clip was taken from a platform initially above and slightly behind the Chinook and later from above the stbd side. There is no indication of whether the footage was taken from another helicopter or a drone. If it was a drone, surely this posed a potential risk to the Chinook as it was outside the pilots view. Any thoughts?
http://http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35189262
http://http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35189262