Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Answer yes or no to the RAF bombing Syria this coming week.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Answer yes or no to the RAF bombing Syria this coming week.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 06:37
  #181 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SWAPS Inner
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why the yoghurt-knitting Guardianista seem to think that there will be so many civilian casualties is beyond me - they obviously still think we're using SNEB rocket packs, cluster weapons and iron bombs - idiots!
Trouble is Leon, as the old saying goes, bombs and bullets don't kill people; people kill people. And I'm sure the patients and staff of the MSF hospital in Kunduz didn't really care if it was a SNEB rocket or a Paveway but they would have cared that faulty intelligence led to them being bombed - human error.

There is ALWAYS collateral damage, a fact of war that should be taken into account. My concern that it will encourage the collateral to spread to the UK.

And just who do we want to win in the end? I know who I want but I'm not sure UK Gov has got the balls to agree...
thunderbird7 is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 06:46
  #182 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, given all the hype of recent days, people could be excused for thinking something important has happened. The I see it is: twice the area + more targets than Iraq + same number of aircraft = half the effect.

But to increase assets in Shader risks the Libyan trap of pushing everything forward for the 'big push' in the expectation of a short campaign only to find it isn't and sustainability becomes a huge problem.

I wonder if anyone at MoD is thinking that this could be a, say, 3 year campaign and to set the pace of ops, assets and resources accordingly for a long haul.
Haart is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 07:04
  #183 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Anyone remember Southern Watch? 10+ years of sniping at the edges of the Iraqi regime. Of course that was when we had more than 5 front line GR sqns!

Atomkraft - lay off the gluesniffing... The public voted in this government - it is therefore the people's will that we fight back against threats to our country
Training Risky is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 07:08
  #184 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 759
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, we are where we are ... I just hope that everyone flies safe and that there has been equally as much planning (if not more) for the retrieval of downed aircrew 'sausage side'.


NB. This is just a wish ... we don't need details here.
FantomZorbin is online now  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 07:50
  #185 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 144
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"The public voted in this government - it is therefore the people's will that we fight back against threats to our country"

A common misconception : the present government was voted for by a minority of the electorate ( PR would address this).

Recent opinion polls show that the majority of the electorate do not support our involvement in Syria.

Never let the facts interfer with people's opinion.
snchater is online now  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 07:52
  #186 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,759
Received 221 Likes on 69 Posts
LJ:-
PS. I also believe there is a special gate for the 'no' voters in the Tower of London and it begins with a 'T'...
When you become the beloved leader, no doubt, Leon. Meanwhile God speed our aircrew, and indeed all members of the coalition, engaged upon their dangerous business.
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 07:59
  #187 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Atomkraft, if you'd have bothered reading through the thread, you would have found plenty of 'No' voters with reasoned arguments. The yes voters in the main also used reasoned arguments rather than the love of 'bombing' people.

Simple really.
AR1 is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 08:00
  #188 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,321
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
AtomKraft and other sceptics - google Hilary Benn's speech - listen to it and then say we are doing the wrong thing by taking the fight to the enemy!
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 08:17
  #189 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by snchater
"The public voted in this government - it is therefore the people's will that we fight back against threats to our country"

A common misconception : the present government was voted for by a minority of the electorate ( PR would address this).

Recent opinion polls show that the majority of the electorate do not support our involvement in Syria.

Never let the facts interfer with people's opinion.
The emboldened statement is correct.

Where you are incorrect is that 64% of our representatives voted for the resolution. If we subtract the SNP who were 100% against we find that 70% of the English, Welsh and Northern Irish MPs of all parties voted for the resolution. That 7 Conservative MPs voted against is democracy.

The vote was a cross-party democratic one by our representatives.

If you voted then they represented your views, like it or not. If you did not vote . . .
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 08:21
  #190 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Haart, your argument is valid if all weapons are expended on every sortie over Iraq. If weapons are not always expended then an increase in the number of potential targets of opportunity in Syria will not halve the effort.

I don't know, nor do I seek to find out, what proportion of sorties do not drop weapons.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 08:55
  #191 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: europe
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whether it is right to bomb ISIS is not the point. Some western governments refuse to learn the lessons of the last 12 years. This present situation was caused by strategic and political blunders in invading Iraq in the first place. Then compounding the situation by getting rid of the Sunni elite from positions of power. Having said that, a homegrown Scottish war criminal was complicit in his sycophantic support of American foreign policy. We were chased out of Basra with our tails between our legs and ground down in Afghanistan. So what will now change? Does anyone really think that ISIS have not assessed Cameron and Obama? ISIS have nothing to fear from these 2. You can send all the bombers and high tech weapons you like, but when your politicians are weak opportunists you are going to lose eventually. All ISIS have to do is keep fighting an asymmetrical war against the west and they will win. Eventually we will sue for peace, or try to find a way out of this mess. History, time and again proves this. My view does not detract from the bravery of the professional airmen of The RAF and allied air forces. These men and women deserve better. I just hope they return to their families safe and well. Time and again over the last decade or so, dedicated, brave, men and women,have paid with their lives because of decisions made by pathetic specimens in Washington and London. Our armed forces deserve better.

Last edited by kapton; 3rd Dec 2015 at 09:04. Reason: Change word
kapton is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 08:57
  #192 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
P-N I heard a figure quoted on TV yesterday that weapons had been used on approximately a quarter of Tornado missions over Iraq in the last year (c 400 out of 1600) .

I have no idea of the source of this figure, or its accuracy, but it seems credible to me.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 08:59
  #193 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
kapton, correct, it is a question of targets.

In Iraq our target was the leadership; their target was our public opinion. Now we have no viable leadership at which to aim; their target remains our public opinion.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 09:20
  #194 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,321
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
Eventually we will sue for peace, or try to find a way out of this mess
You can't sue for peace with ISIS, they are not interested in it!

What we are trying to do now is find a way out of the mess and the bombing will be a very small (but necessary) part of it. If the bombing is simply a delaying tactic which just slows down the spread of ISIS, it will have served its purpose.

Whilst we try to contain them miitarily, other tactics can be deployed; economic, diplomatic, religious, cyber etc etc but anything that can be done NOW to degrade their capabilities must be done.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 09:42
  #195 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
TTN, thank you. I believe the potential target area is double the size (a guess), so given your figure, the current number of weapons systems would seem adequate.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 10:05
  #196 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nottingham
Age: 76
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Decision Taken

Surely ladies and gentlemen now that the go option has been democratically voted for, the only response on this forum should be the unequivocal support of our crews tasked with this thankless business.


To quote Dave Allen, 'may their god go with them' and for heavens sake lets hope all in Cyprus are more than alert to possible incursions
Prangster is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 10:21
  #197 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Votes - I cherish our democracy, despite some arguable weaknesses (PR etc). Yesterday's session was for the opposition to lose; they managed that in spades. The decision to bomb was not due to the strength of the Conservative Right, it was due to the complete ineffectiveness of Labour, et al. Ironically Corbyn, a Stop the War stalwart, has much to answer for here in his complete inability to motivate, lead, mobilise and unite.

Labour need to get rid of him fast and put someone in his place who can at least present an argument.
Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 10:28
  #198 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: England
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
See the Jet Blast forum - suddenly Benn looks like Labour's bright shining star.
papajuliet is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 10:31
  #199 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
unequivocal support of our crews
Indeed.

complete ineffectiveness of Labour
The 'weak' opposition allowed a free vote - I don't see that as a weakness. Most of the time there is disagreement within a party, but party policy overrides that disagreement giving a united front. In instances such as this a free vote is the best way of achieving proper representation. Of course you could argue there would have been a revolt had he not offered a free vote... But that's for another day and time.

Anyhow, it's done. lets get on with it.
AR1 is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 10:32
  #200 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
PS. I also believe there is a special gate for the 'no' voters in the Tower of London and it begins with a 'T'...
WTF

I though that UK was a Democracy where people get to exercise Free Will.

Indicating that if you don't vote for a Government on its latest exercise overseas makes you a traitor then UK has a real problem.
racedo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.