Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

BBC - Inside The RAF - Chinook cockpit displays censored?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

BBC - Inside The RAF - Chinook cockpit displays censored?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Oct 2015, 00:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBC - Inside The RAF - Chinook cockpit displays censored?

Having watched tonight's, 'Inside the RAF' programme, which focused on the Chinook display team, I couldn't help but notice that each time there was a view of the cockpit, the displays were censored! What could possibly be sensitive about the two LCD displays? One appeared to show standard flight information, atitude, altitude, speed, etc, the other seemed to be a moving map display, yet both were crudely blurred, what gives?

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2015, 00:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Essex
Age: 65
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would, of course, be entirely wrong (not to say abhorrently cynical) to suggest that somebody at RWTES Boscombe Down, having signed the Release To Service, does not wish it to be publicly known that these displays do not actually work.
exuw is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2015, 06:19
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zummerset
Posts: 1,042
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Hmmm...someone being ultra-ITAR sensitive? The cockpit is a subtly modified Thales Top Deck system which is used on several commercial aircraft, and MoD hasn't been shy of showing static pictures of it in the past;

Upgraded Chinook Operational in Afghanistan

Apart from over-blown TV commentary I thought it was a great programme.
Evalu8ter is online now  
Old 26th Oct 2015, 08:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Don't let weird Wally see this thread, or he'll start wittering on with his PRC112 conspiracy theory for the MoK accident again......

The BBC programme was pretty good, although the commentary was a bit OTT. Some quite extraordinary Chinook manoeuvres, which were very interesting to see from the cockpit as well as from outside.

But I was rather surprised that the BBC didn't mention that the BBMF's Milly is the son of an ex-VDF display pilot - with both aircraft in the same programme, you'd have thought that someone might have known that!
BEagle is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2015, 09:07
  #5 (permalink)  
GipsyMagpie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If only....

Originally Posted by exuw
It would, of course, be entirely wrong (not to say abhorrently cynical) to suggest that somebody at RWTES Boscombe Down, having signed the Release To Service, does not wish it to be publicly known that these displays do not actually work.
If only it was RWTES that signed off the RTS. They might not have let it get past the drawing board given the chance. I think you'll find by the time RWTES get their hands on it its too late to do anything but recommend the best way to overcome any deficiencies. If their is any fault it is much further back in the procurement process.
 
Old 26th Oct 2015, 09:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Apart from over-blown TV commentary I thought it was a great programme.
Agreed. The commentator seems to have used Jeremy Clarkson as a voice coach, with the same silly style of delivery. That, and blowing up minor irritations into crises which supposedly threaten the displays, which of course are overcome each time.

Other than that it was very entertaining, that "roller coaster" manouevre in the Chinook is really impressive
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2015, 09:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally, I thought the handbrake turn aced it!
glad rag is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2015, 09:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Somerset
Posts: 192
Received 42 Likes on 15 Posts
RP,

Didn't see the programme, but it is extremely hard to get video of a raster display. Your eyes don't notice it but the display appears one line at a time and the TV camera takes it's picture the same way. If the camera and the display are not specifically synchronised then the appearance and collection lines by the camera do not coincide often enough to get useable pictures.


N
Bengo is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2015, 09:55
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Runway vacated
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree on the display. The Rollercoaster was dramatic, but the Handbrake Turn/Stop was equally dramatic and tactically relevant, so trumps.
FleurDeLys is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2015, 11:34
  #10 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
TV use of Jeopardy and Suspense is tiresome at times, and a little like the boy who cried wolf, you no longer believe it.

Great footage of the Chinook, and the highlight for me was the team pretending to be the Red Arrows on the pleasure beach ride.

There HAS to be footage of the real Reds on that surely?
AR1 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2015, 11:48
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having seen a lot of daytime TV recently I've noticed the use of dramatic music and over the top narration to build suspense on many scenes. The problem is that the programmes have been featuring such risky and dangerous occupations as: investigating fly tipping, dealing with dog mess or delivery drivers making deliveries
barnstormer1968 is offline  
Old 26th Oct 2015, 11:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Frensham
Posts: 846
Received 90 Likes on 48 Posts
Wokkafans is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2015, 10:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thought it was an enjoyable programme, especially the concentration on some of the individual pilots who have been in the display world for a long time and who contribute enormously to the public's enjoyment and appreciation of the history and professionalism of the RAF.
The script was crap and the commentator was awful.
The highlight for me was the technical bit when the sharp point of the country's military sword couldn't be unsheathed because the canopy stuck. Consternation! High profile display doomed. The technicians try everything to no avail. Up comes an erk, gives it a thump and lo, it opens! Priceless!

Last edited by Genstabler; 4th Nov 2015 at 10:22. Reason: Grammar
Genstabler is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2015, 10:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Genstabler
Up comes an erk, gives it a thump and lo, it opens! Priceless!
Some erk? Nice.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2015, 12:45
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 745
Received 25 Likes on 8 Posts
fish

Nice to see the Helicopter guys getting some publicity. What was that orange thingy that was flapping about around the pilots shoulder?
Stitchbitch is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2015, 12:54
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where is CG of Chinook? And why is it called Wokka?

At first glance, I'd expect the CG of the Chinook to be towards the rear, given the rear engine layout. But watching some of its aerobatic manoeuvres, the rotation appears to be about a point much further forwards. Also, it has double wheels at the front and single at the back. So where approx is the CG?

Also, everybody thinks that Chinooks are called Wokkas because of the characteristic noise they make. However, I was recently in New Zealand and a Maori soldier there (who had served in UK army) told me that this was incorrect - and that the name is derived from Woka - which is Maori for war canoe. I quite like his version!
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2015, 13:15
  #17 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 413 Likes on 218 Posts
Perhaps the cockpit displays really are blurred........
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2015, 13:54
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't see the programme, but it is extremely hard to get video of a raster display.
CRTs are (usually) raster displays. LCD screens are (almost never) raster displays. The Chinook has non-raster LCD screens.

As for why they would be pixelate them for this TV program, while the LCD display itself is not "sensitive" the data displayed on them may be. And it's far easier to just pixelate them for public viewing all the time rather than pixelate them only if and when sensitive data is displayed.
KenV is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2015, 14:44
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Despite the censoring of the displays, you could see that the info being presented appeared to flight instruments and a map, and I still fail to see why that would be sensitive...

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2015, 15:42
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still fail to see why that would be sensitive...
It's not about what IS sensitive. It is about what MAY be sensitive on those screens. The editors of the video simply pixelated the screens all the time because that is far easier than carefully reviewing every frame of the video to make sure no sensitive information was being displayed.
KenV is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.