Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Maritime Patrol Capability: The SDSR’s Wolf Whistle

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Maritime Patrol Capability: The SDSR’s Wolf Whistle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Nov 2015, 12:04
  #341 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,231
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
That's because the new, leaner aircrew don't eat them any more - even ancient aircrew have fitness tests these days.
I can just see it now; an onboard gym so that aircrew can have regular fitness breaks.
Martin the Martian is online now  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 12:09
  #342 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
JAVELINBOY, those galley ladies wouldn't have been able to work without interference on the 'Mighty Muncher'....

But as the P-8A doesn't have an air engineer, they should be OK on that!
BEagle is online now  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 12:31
  #343 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Newport
Age: 70
Posts: 494
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mighty Muncher indeed a lasting memory of an aef on a Nimrod was watching one munch through a multi deck sandwich consisting of half a sliced loaf with assorted fillings, he didn't even drop a crumb.
JAVELINBOY is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 21:32
  #344 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nine aircraft may not sound like a lot, but it really depends upon availability.

I flew around 6,000 hours on the Nimrod, a fair proportion of those with important bits of kit either not working or not even present in the first place. Some days, out of the serried ranks of aircraft sat out on the Line, only very few were truly serviceable.

I now have 5000 hours plus on the 737, and instruct on the -800 and guess what? Nearly every single time you get into one it works as advertised! Now of course we don't have mission equipment to worry about, but I would be prepared to bet modern reliability is an order of magnitude better than that of previous generations.

Looked at in that way, you should get a pretty solid capability from 9 modern well equipped jets - just as long as the good old RAF does not fall into the trap of over engineering every aspect of maintenance and support that is.
retrosgone is online now  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 21:59
  #345 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SWAPS Inner
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and it won't have the Nimrod hydraulic systems... nuff said
thunderbird7 is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 00:31
  #346 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the workshop, Prune-whispering.
Age: 71
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^^
...but at least we had 4 of them ;o)
PingDit is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 05:09
  #347 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SALISBURY
Age: 76
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I flew around 6,000 hours on the Nimrod, a fair proportion of those with important bits of kit either not working or not even present in the first place. Some days, out of the serried ranks of aircraft sat out on the Line, only very few were truly serviceable.


You were obviously based at Kinloss! I never had problems like that in all my happy & serviceable years on 42 (TB) Sqn!!
fincastle84 is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 07:13
  #348 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: S of 55N
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.pprune.org/military-aviat...ml#post8579903: Post 498, July last year.

The RAF is buying into a US Program, not just an aircraft. That's a (surprisingly) smart thing to do. We get the upgrades when they get the upgrades, we get to influence the upgrades, we get massive gearing on US investment.

Best defence decision in years.

Sun Who

Last edited by Sun Who; 28th Nov 2015 at 16:41.
Sun Who is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 16:29
  #349 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Freudian slip, Sun Who
Ubehagligpolitiker is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 17:06
  #350 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you were obviously based at Kinloss! I never had problems like that in all my happy & serviceable years on 42 (TB) Sqn!!
Easy tiger. I know you're a fan of the good ol days...a lot of us are, but some of the kit was awesome and worked well and some of it was ...not so much.

And that was in the 80's. If you'd flown the old beast in the late nineties,early noughties, you'd routinely have been getting airborne with a bits and bobs limmed all over the shop.

Lets not get too rose tinted over the old girl...she was mighty fine kite, but what really made her tick was the bods who flew her and fixed her.
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 18:29
  #351 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 327
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
...Not forgetting that 9 P8 is off the right hand end of the scale compared with the scenarios many were describing and expecting a few weeks ago.
Frostchamber is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 19:08
  #352 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
TOFO, I was lucky to fly in new aircraft throughout my career with the exception of 24 year old Shacks, even the Anson was only 20 and the Lanc 25.

I last flew in the Nimrod when it was a bare 10 years old. I was invited on board one at RIAT when it was then 35 years old. I was amazed and in a way distressed at how shabby it was.

Regardless of the magic kit being upgraded, if modern aircraft are to serve 35 years and more then the whole plane needs to be refurbished.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2015, 20:53
  #353 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Sussex By The Sea
Age: 79
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You were obviously based at Kinloss! I never had problems like that in all my happy & serviceable years on 42 (TB) Sqn!!
Come on Spock ....I know you are getting old and your memory probably isn't what it used to be but .....really???
nimbev is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 02:27
  #354 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: aus
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
U.K. Strives To Become More Reliable Defense Partner | Defense content from Aviation Week

Prime Minister David Cameron told the House of Commons that the U.K. P-8s would have “a major British component”

It sounds like they will have a pie warmer in the galley after all.
a1bill is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2015, 00:04
  #355 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coughs...

http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/5...-bushings.html
glad rag is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2015, 16:50
  #356 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by a1bill
Prime Minister David Cameron told the House of Commons that the U.K. P-8s would have “a major British component”

It sounds like they will have a pie warmer in the galley after all.
Oh dear, do I smell pork roasting?

Will this change the unit price?

OK, what is spent in UK stays in UK, but how much will it cost to change the basic design?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2015, 16:54
  #357 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 327
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
A pair of Speys would fit it up very nicely. Or perhaps he was referring to the crew?
Frostchamber is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2015, 21:02
  #358 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: West of Suez
Posts: 336
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Fallon to Discuss Maritime Surveillance options, Including P-8 Acceleration, with Carter
AnglianAV8R is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2015, 22:20
  #359 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Llandudno
Age: 100
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maritime Patrol Capability. The SDSR's Wolf Whistle

Going back 64 years, the Americans "lent" us fifty Neptunes because the Shackletons were only slowly coming off the production line. Perhaps they would lend us some of their current Maritime aircraft until the P8 becomes available - and we could be in business again.
Ormeside28 is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2015, 23:30
  #360 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 564
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
When you get P-8s in 2019, does that mean that Fincastle is reinstated ??
BBadanov is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.