MIG-29 Question?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In a hold
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MIG-29 Question?
Today at RIAT during the Typhoon/Spitfire Battle of Britain display (which was outstanding in itself) the Polish Mig 29 was waiting at the holding point prior to its display slot, when roughly every 5mins or so it did a brief engine run up emitting a cracking amount of black exhaust smoke. I'm just curious, to what causes so much black smoke, and is this a normal pre-takeoff procedure when holding? Incidentally the answer was explained over the speaker during the display but it was perfectly timed with a climb on re-heat, so I don't think much was heard by anyone north of Swindon! Funnily, it was the only aircraft I could smell as well, which I thought was a brilliant two fingers to the emissions driven world we are constantly reminded about in modern life! Anyhow, up there with the best displays of the day.....thanks to all the crews, both air and ground, excellent day.
Thanks in advance for the answer...F26
Thanks in advance for the answer...F26
Last edited by Fly26; 19th Jul 2015 at 22:37. Reason: Correction
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funnily, it was the only aircraft I could smell as well, which I thought was a brilliant two fingers to the emissions driven world we are constantly reminded about in modern life!
Yeah!...screw the air we breathe, it's not like we couldn't last very long without it.
Yeah!...screw the air we breathe, it's not like we couldn't last very long without it.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Great Midwest
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is because of the design of the RD-33 engine combustion chamber on the earlier engines. The Klimow RD-33 was the first Russian turbofan jet engine in mass production. It has a one stage injector which is not as efficient as many western designs. A new version of that engine (RD-33MK) doesn’t smoke as much. Poland’s MiG-29s do not have upgraded engines because of political reasons and cost.
Sometime around 1998, Petr Izotov, V.Ya.Klimov plant chief designer was quoted as saying: “Smoke is absolutely subjective. It would be a problem if it would affect plane’s flight performance or engine characteristics. But it doesn’t!” Obviously the operational implications of being seen at much longer ranges was not mentioned.
Sometime around 1998, Petr Izotov, V.Ya.Klimov plant chief designer was quoted as saying: “Smoke is absolutely subjective. It would be a problem if it would affect plane’s flight performance or engine characteristics. But it doesn’t!” Obviously the operational implications of being seen at much longer ranges was not mentioned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: In a hold
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Bevo! I appreciate the answer, I thought there might be a more in depth reason for it. Brilliant picture, that's pretty much what we all saw. Sorry Bigbux I'm sure I heard between the noise they will be operational until 2030 
It is because of the design of the RD-33 engine combustion chamber on the earlier engines. The Klimow RD-33 was the first Russian turbofan jet engine in mass production. It has a one stage injector which is not as efficient as many western designs. A new version of that engine (RD-33MK) doesn’t smoke as much. Poland’s MiG-29s do not have upgraded engines because of political reasons and cost.
Sometime around 1998, Petr Izotov, V.Ya.Klimov plant chief designer was quoted as saying: “Smoke is absolutely subjective. It would be a problem if it would affect plane’s flight performance or engine characteristics. But it doesn’t!” Obviously the operational implications of being seen at much longer ranges was not mentioned.
Sometime around 1998, Petr Izotov, V.Ya.Klimov plant chief designer was quoted as saying: “Smoke is absolutely subjective. It would be a problem if it would affect plane’s flight performance or engine characteristics. But it doesn’t!” Obviously the operational implications of being seen at much longer ranges was not mentioned.
Maybe one of its "secret tactics" is to smoke the enemy to death...
"I think they got a good deal on the F4's J79s "
Not likely, but they may have "copied" a feature without knowing its purpose. A few other items from the F4 made its way into Soviet aircraft.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is because of the design of the RD-33 engine combustion chamber on the earlier engines. The Klimow RD-33 was the first Russian turbofan jet engine in mass production. It has a one stage injector which is not as efficient as many western designs. A new version of that engine (RD-33MK) doesn’t smoke as much. Poland’s MiG-29s do not have upgraded engines because of political reasons and cost.
Sometime around 1998, Petr Izotov, V.Ya.Klimov plant chief designer was quoted as saying: “Smoke is absolutely subjective. It would be a problem if it would affect plane’s flight performance or engine characteristics. But it doesn’t!” Obviously the operational implications of being seen at much longer ranges was not mentioned.
Sometime around 1998, Petr Izotov, V.Ya.Klimov plant chief designer was quoted as saying: “Smoke is absolutely subjective. It would be a problem if it would affect plane’s flight performance or engine characteristics. But it doesn’t!” Obviously the operational implications of being seen at much longer ranges was not mentioned.
Both had brilliant designers/teams IMO.
The Speys had nothing on the J-79s, 27mm. Looking along a smoke trail, it was pretty obvious on the Ks and Ms, but nowhere near as bad.
Holy smoke!
Image credit: Phantom Pharewell, Wittmund, June 29th 2013 by Gerben Wessels, on Flickr
Holy smoke!
Image credit: Phantom Pharewell, Wittmund, June 29th 2013 by Gerben Wessels, on Flickr