A Sad Waste of Life - Lynx Crash 2014 Kandahar.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thread is about a very sensitive topic. There is a very good chance that those who died in this crash were friends with some of the members here. A little compassion and respect by not being so confrontational when it isn't necessary wouldn't go amiss.
And on a related note: I think this outcry against the pilot is not only disrespectful, it is wholly unfounded. Performing "a low G descent" into an airfield in a combat zone is standard procedure and ensuring the passengers are properly strapped in in the event of such a maneuver is highly professional. Even the A330 Voyager crew mentioned in the article performed low G descent into what was probably a much larger, more secure facility. And according to the article "there was no way of knowing" 1) if the pilot actually performed a low G descent and 2) even if he did, if it contributed at all to the crash. But there were a few folks here writing not only as if they were certain that he did, but that it directly led to the crash. Again, to my American sensibilities such statements are harsh, disrespectful, and not compassionate. And I honestly and respectfully don't understand how (some?) Brits think such statements are not.
Ken, the reference to the Voyager is in relation to an incident in which an aircraft plummeted thousands of feet and was very nearly lost, not a reference to a low G entry into a combat theatre. The implication being that the passenger who mentioned it was experiencing the same intense negative G in the Lynx.
If you're going to rant and rail, at least do your research.
If you're going to rant and rail, at least do your research.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is no recognisable implicacation in Shot One's statement; the statement is as clear as a bell
As for "not trying to make an issue out of nothing" calling for "rage" and "disbelief" is not "nothing". Neither is accusing the whole pilot community of "a long list of minor infringements, short-cuts and "tolerations" which had obviously gone on for some time prior". To me, ShotOne's post was disrespectful of an aircrew who died in the performance of their duty while serving their nation in a combat zone and deserved outrage rather than the mild rebuke I provided. Indeed, to me it was exactly the kind of outrageous disrespect that thankfully was cut off in the A400M crash thread. Why some folks tolerate that kind of disrespect for a helo crew in a combat zone totally escapes me.
KenV
I've deliberately refrained from comment so far, but you really need to read the official inquiry report in Wrathmonk's second post rather than the Daily Mail article in the first post.
Just because it occurred in an operational theatre doesn't mean that the pilot didn't make mistakes. Mistakes happen, both in peace time and in war time and the official inquiry report makes it very clear what to their expert military judgement they believe occurred on that fateful day based on experience, radar traces and CVR data. You're right in so much as
But this wasn't a decent into an operational airfield, it was a air-ground gunnery shoot where the final pass went tragically wrong when a whole host of mistakes and contributory and aggravating factors combined into an unrecoverable situation. Pointing out those mistakes and factors is far from disrespectful if it prevents a similar occurrence in future; let that be the only good thing to come out of this terrible incident.
I've deliberately refrained from comment so far, but you really need to read the official inquiry report in Wrathmonk's second post rather than the Daily Mail article in the first post.
Just because it occurred in an operational theatre doesn't mean that the pilot didn't make mistakes. Mistakes happen, both in peace time and in war time and the official inquiry report makes it very clear what to their expert military judgement they believe occurred on that fateful day based on experience, radar traces and CVR data. You're right in so much as
Performing "a low G descent" into an airfield in a combat zone is standard procedure and ensuring the passengers are properly strapped in in the event of such a maneuver is highly professional.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ken, the reference to the Voyager is in relation to an incident in which an aircraft plummeted thousands of feet and was very nearly lost, not a reference to a low G entry into a combat theatre. The implication being that the passenger who mentioned it was experiencing the same intense negative G in the Lynx.
If you're going to rant and rail, at least do your research.
If you're going to rant and rail, at least do your research.
A Sad Waste of Life - Lynx Crash 2014 Kandahar.
KenV.
Where could you do that research? The aforementioned accident report attached to an earlier post.
I'm not taking sides on a petty squabble such as this. Especially not when it relates to a fatal accident.
Might I suggest that nobody emerges from a thread like this smelling of roses when people start abusing each other. I for one will keep my thoughts to myself
BV
Where could you do that research? The aforementioned accident report attached to an earlier post.
I'm not taking sides on a petty squabble such as this. Especially not when it relates to a fatal accident.
Might I suggest that nobody emerges from a thread like this smelling of roses when people start abusing each other. I for one will keep my thoughts to myself
BV
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But this wasn't a decent into an operational airfield, it was a air-ground gunnery shoot where the final pass went tragically wrong when a whole host of contributory and aggravating factors combined into an unrecoverable situation.
Pointing out those mistakes and factors is far from disrespectful if it prevents a similar occurrence in future; let that be the only good thing to come out of this terrible incident.
The Voyager incident happened a few months before this incident, and the implication from the report was that while he may or may not have been a passenger, he was certainly aware of it. That was the inference that the investigating panel drew, according to the report, and why he made the comment that he did.
While I have never been on a Voyager flying into theatre, I have been on other large passenger aircraft into Bagram and Kandahar, and on no occasion did I ever experience anything close to a negative G approach.
While I have never been on a Voyager flying into theatre, I have been on other large passenger aircraft into Bagram and Kandahar, and on no occasion did I ever experience anything close to a negative G approach.
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
KenV.
Where could you do that research? The aforementioned accident report attached to an earlier post.
Where could you do that research? The aforementioned accident report attached to an earlier post.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Age: 84
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The book 'Sweating the Metal' is all about flying helicopters in Afghanistan (the Chinook in this case) and the rules and restrictions that are imposed on the crews are far more stringent then any I endured during my service. That said, the helo's are often operated at best speed and the very minimum of altitude to avoid fire from the Taliban who have no rules of engagement. Low level training in the UK is limited - so how do the crews practice unless they do it unofficially?
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Low level training in the UK is limited - so how do the crews practice unless they do it unofficially?
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
Low level training in the UK is limited - so how do the crews practice unless they do it unofficially?
As for speaking in respectful tones, why yes, the dead deserve respect. But even more respectful is making sure their colleagues who are still alive today avoid the same pitfalls that killed them, even if it highlights personal shortcomings. Better to be blunt and breathing than deferential and dead.
PS. Quite staggering to see that after more than 30 years of service Westland and the MoD appear content for Lynx crews to risk being burned to death any time the aircraft hits the ground. Just about every accident report castigates the fuel cell and fuel coupling design as non-crashworthy, yet apparently it's not "cost effective" to fix. Just look at the full list of Lynx crash related fires - it's unconscionable.
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I stand to be corrected, but haven't the last three Lynx fatals included personnel that didn't need to be on board? This one has guys that were along for the ride, I'm sure that the Basra cab had one guy on that was on a "famil" and of course the Czech Republic cab sadly has four from the Artillery on board. It maybe that its size offers that temptation to take someone along for a jolly. We certainly did this in Bosnia and I'll readily admit to playing to the audience....there but for the grace of God.
Gentleman Aviator
The Voyager incident happened a few months before this incident, and the implication from the report was that while he may or may not have been a passenger
It wasn't exactly difficult to find either; I think reading the whole SI took me well less than an hour .......
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Down Under
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any chance the bunt might have cavitated the hyds?
Had an instance when I was in a Wessex that was bunted and there was a significant delay in being able to regain cyclic control in pitch.....luckily this was at height. Could this happen in a Lynx?
HPT
HPT
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A sad day for all concerned.
The new style of investigation quite rightly forensically analyses all aspects of the operation of crew and equipment at the time of the incident however many of the considerations identified may not be directly attributable to the direct cause of the accident. It is quite right however that as many lessons are learnt as possible.
The direct cause of the accident in this case seems to be a loss of situational awareness with respect to rate of descent and or speed combined with poor external height clues and locally rising ground.
I wonder whether any consideration was given to the possible momentary distraction that concentration on the 'head up display' may have caused taking away awareness of the 'outside world' if indeed it was worn at the time. Ally that to whether the rad alt indication had any lag in any aspect of the system from sensing (in recovering from an angle of bank or high rate of descent) to physical presentation in the eye. It is possible that in this scenario that reliance on HUD to the detriment of external lookout (the brain can only do one thing at a time) might have removed awareness of gently rising ground. The rad alt has a latency in relation to topography at high speed (instantaneous v approaching).
I did read the whole SI but did not note any detailed comment to this effect however standing by to have my lack of attention to detail pointed out to me.
HEDP
The new style of investigation quite rightly forensically analyses all aspects of the operation of crew and equipment at the time of the incident however many of the considerations identified may not be directly attributable to the direct cause of the accident. It is quite right however that as many lessons are learnt as possible.
The direct cause of the accident in this case seems to be a loss of situational awareness with respect to rate of descent and or speed combined with poor external height clues and locally rising ground.
I wonder whether any consideration was given to the possible momentary distraction that concentration on the 'head up display' may have caused taking away awareness of the 'outside world' if indeed it was worn at the time. Ally that to whether the rad alt indication had any lag in any aspect of the system from sensing (in recovering from an angle of bank or high rate of descent) to physical presentation in the eye. It is possible that in this scenario that reliance on HUD to the detriment of external lookout (the brain can only do one thing at a time) might have removed awareness of gently rising ground. The rad alt has a latency in relation to topography at high speed (instantaneous v approaching).
I did read the whole SI but did not note any detailed comment to this effect however standing by to have my lack of attention to detail pointed out to me.
HEDP
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ken I loiter about here and every contribution you make is both provocative and dull In equal measure
But in one sense something good came out of my recent "dull" posts in the thread. The attacks against the pilots who gave their lives in the service of their nation have stopped. At least for now. I consider that a positive outcome and worth the occasional vitriol directed at me.
Lack of sleep
I am surprised that the report did not investigate more the handling pilot's lack of sleep. He had been surfing the internet until 0145 and, if flying at 0800, would likely to have risen sometime about 0630-0700, leaving around 5 hours of sleep. The exact time could have been established, since he shared accommodation with pilot of Lynx 2, but this is not mentioned. Nor is there any mention of the Wing's SOPs for obligatory off-duty rest-time, even though the Squadron OC was Lynx 1 Commander. Nor is there any discussion of the PH's previous day's duties.
Given that the report mentions his lack of sleep as a possibly aggravating factor, it does not seem to have been investigated very thoroughly.
Given that the report mentions his lack of sleep as a possibly aggravating factor, it does not seem to have been investigated very thoroughly.
Last edited by Trim Stab; 17th Jul 2015 at 21:38.