Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Is the Russian AF showing signs of age?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Is the Russian AF showing signs of age?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jul 2015, 17:22
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MOSCOW — Two pilots were killed when a strategic bomber with seven people on board crashed in far eastern Russia on Tuesday, the defense ministry said, the latest in a string of military aircraft accidents.

"The search and rescue team of the eastern military district has found where two members of the Tu-95 bomber landed," the Russian defense ministry said in a statement.

"Both pilots were killed," the defense ministry said in the statement carried by Russian news agencies.

"According to reports from the scene, the pilots were killed during landing," said the statement.

The defense ministry had earlier said that the jet's seven crew members, who were taking part in a training flight outside of the city of Khabarovsk, had managed to parachute out.

The bomber was not carrying a combat payload at the time of the incident and the crash caused no damage on the ground, the defense ministry said.

The five surviving crew members have been sent to a military hospital in Khabarovsk to undergo medical examinations. Their lives are not at risk, said the defense ministry.

All Tu-95 bombers have been grounded until the circumstances surrounding the latest incident have been elucidated, the ministry said.
Two Pilots Killed In Russian Tu-95 Bomber Crash
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2015, 17:26
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: De Profundis
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about our own fleets (UK), was age of the airframe ever considered to be a factor in any incident/accident? I'd be surprised as I always though we generally had a good handle on fleet FI/management.

Tom

Last edited by Tom Joad; 14th Jul 2015 at 17:42.
Tom Joad is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 07:49
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
At least its not as bad as it once was. An idle search through the aviation-safety.net website database for, say, 1956 reveals a loss of RAF transport assets as: 9 Valetta, one each of Marathon, Varsity, Hastings, Sunderland and Shackleton. And 27 lives lost. No mention of fighters, bombers or trainers in this year but other years have more detail. And don't look at the USAF- multiply the above by 3 or 4 times.


It is seriously sobering how far aviation safety has come. This afternoon in the Melbourne "Age" website the headline was how a Virgin B777 came to be slightly below ideal approach altitude- again this was the headline!


From my limited experience of Russian civil equipment they are built like a brick sh*thouse and the main issue is limited overhaul times.
airspace alpha is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 08:16
  #24 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,393
Received 1,586 Likes on 723 Posts
RAF 1956 Losses 380, over one a day....
ORAC is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 11:25
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
and the main issue is limited overhaul times
....and spares. The third world is littered with derelict Russian aircraft that have been cannibalised out of existance. Botch-ups were the normal method of repair. After a few crashes involving Russian airliners the Chinese CAAC read the Riot Act and withing a few years they were all replaced by western equipment with prompt and traceable backup.

On the approach to Tianjin in the late 90s you could see the ex-Aeroflot 154s being stripped for spares for Chinese 154s.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 11:28
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
In East Anglia in the 50s if you didn't have three pillars of smoke on the horizon by Monday lunchtime the week hadn't really got started.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 21:04
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Great Midwest
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
RAF 1956 Losses 380, over one a day....
Good heavens!! And that is what some folks call the "good old days.
Bevo is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2015, 21:17
  #28 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,393
Received 1,586 Likes on 723 Posts
Good heavens!! And that is what some folks call the "good old days.
To quote one retiring VSO - "It was bloody good fun, and the survivors were worth having"........
ORAC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.