Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Austria's Typhoons

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Austria's Typhoons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Nov 2014, 23:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wengen
Age: 53
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Austria's Typhoons

https://medium.com/war-is-boring/aus...s-e24649385bf3
Winnerhofer is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2014, 23:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the key to neutrality being capable of making an aggressors effort not worth his while? So wouldn't you want the best interceptor rather than something best suited to mud moving?

I'm reminded of what happened to Belgium a bit over 100 years ago.
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2014, 00:04
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Fife
Posts: 271
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Imagine if every other smaller nation adopted the same attitude

How would it be for the UK if Norway didnt keep Q for example?

The idea is we all pool responsibility, to create an unequivocal response.

5% of the solution is a valid part of the solution
Coochycool is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2014, 05:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Waiting to return to the Loire.
Age: 54
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An interesting piece IMO.
More aircraft than aircrew is an interesting metric.
Finnpog is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2014, 07:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Finnpog
More aircraft than aircrew is an interesting metric.
At the start of the service life it makes sense. You'll have attrition, and you can rotate the airframes in and out of reserve to extend fatigue life. You can't expect to buy a top up airframe or two in a decade or more, so buying everything you'll likely need now is sensible.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2014, 07:52
  #6 (permalink)  
HTB
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Over the hill (and far away)
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Note the name of the author of this one-eyed piece of scribble - David Axe; he obviously has one to grind...

Mister B
HTB is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2014, 09:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The article certainly mentions the word bribe quite a lot.
It mentions conviction a lot less.

Conversely, when the SNP were thinking through their post independence military needs they decided they would need more typhoons than Austria have, with many commentators stating that an initial supply of 12 wouldn't be enough.
barnstormer1968 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.