Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Who pays for "child minding Air Force 1 & the rest at Fairford?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Who pays for "child minding Air Force 1 & the rest at Fairford?

Old 5th Sep 2014, 16:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 647
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who pays for "child minding Air Force 1 & the rest at Fairford?

with easy visibily and lots of "sightseers" I hope the tax payer is not paying for the local police and that of Thames Valley to be sitting around doing very little all day......apart from being on US territory I guess, would this not have been more cost effective if parked up at BZN or closer to where the summit is - say CWL......too logical?
nivsy is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 16:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Unless you want a lot of armed foreign soldiers and police roaming the countryside, it's normal for host nations to provide security in any country. On their own base, of course, it's up to them.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 16:52
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,929
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
RAF Fairford is not US territory, the clue is in the title, and why would you park the jets at Cranwell? Security of Air Force 1 is usually tightly controlled by the USAF, not sure why Brize would be any better!
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 16:56
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 647
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The clue maybe a red herring- I believe that RAF Fairford is actually on a lease agreement with American cousins.

Brize better because not so easy from main road to see the aircraft therefore could migate need for excessive police presence on perimeter road.

indeed, still no idea why the a/c is not where the summit is - South Wales not Wiltshire, Oxfordshire etc......the clue is in the location!
nivsy is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 17:13
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Age: 30
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air Force One usually isn't on the ground for long enough to need security - the aircraft only takes on that call sign when the President of the United States is on-board. The same applies for 'Marine One', the helicopter that transports Presbo.

I thought the SS was responsible for providing security of the aircraft when on the ground?

As an aside, has the British government allowed an exception for security personnel protecting the President to carry firearms? They're usually armed in the U.S.
Typhoon93 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 17:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If there's a US airfield within a few miles (53) from the location of the conference, why would the USAF park one of their jets on a civvy airfield?

I presume by CWL you mean Cardiff rather than Cranwell, but a civvy airfield is a lot harder to secure than a military one. Given the NATO summit might be expected to bring forth agitators (and has done so), security would be a fairly high priority thing. BZZ would have sufficed, but I suspect the Secret Service would rather run the show themselves on their own airfield than be subject to MOD Plod, civvy plod and even the RAF Police all having a pissing contest.

A few civvy plod guarding the outside of a sparse airfield seems reasonable, given that the UK has the privilege of hosting the summit.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 17:16
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 647
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Armed in the US like every other American citizen you mean....

The aircraft has been on the ground at Fairford for 2 days now I think. Issue is nt security behind the wire but on public highways.

Your comment makes sense Roadster (to me) and yes CWL is Cardiff airport - although I draw the line at "privilege" perhaps...
nivsy is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 17:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
I believe that RAF Fairford is actually on a lease agreement with American cousins.
Doesn't make it US territory, nor in fact is the US embassy. Leasing something doesn't make it yours, buying something does.
Bing is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 17:22
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 647
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would I not be correct in saying that should Fairford be leased to the USA, then they have every right under said lease agreement to operate within the boundary of the airfield as if it was American territory?

Who owns Mildenhall?
nivsy is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 17:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Age: 30
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since military bases are, by and large, off-limits to (most) civilians anyway, I can't see the security of the aircraft being a problem as there is security of the station 24/7. At most I'd guess those on guard duty at that particular base are armed. That was certainly the case when I did a brief stint at a Naval dockyard on work experience.

I believe the USAF also carry the Marine helicopters and the crews which transport the President by air. He likes to take them everywhere he goes if possible, and I can't see any reason why it wouldn't be possible in the UK. So his security isn't really an issue since the venue is surrounded by plod and other employed security personnel, and the airspace is off limits to civilian aircraft.
Typhoon93 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 17:28
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ROYAL AIR FORCE Mildenhall is owned by er... UK MOD.

It has an RAF Station Commander. The Base Commander and 99% of the staff on the base are USAF, but it is still an RAF station, like all USAF-occupied stations in the UK.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 17:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
They have the right to exercise extraterritoriality, i.e. exercise their own legal jurisdiction etc. as do embassies etc. however this is at the gift of the host nation and isn't automatically conveyed by the act of leasing land.
The exact details governing Fairford, Mildenhall etc. is probably down to an inter-governmental agreement but it doesn't stop it being UK territory, and if we thought they were up to something dodgy we could probably remove the right. Certainly this is the situation with embassies as I understand it, i.e. if they are conducting activities not in keeping with their status as an embassy then it stops having diplomatic immunity.
Bing is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 17:34
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 647
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed, yet Mildenhall doesoperate almost like an American station, it has outlets that are US Dollars and operates through agreement like a US base...goodness not sure when a UK aircraft visited last on any mission.

Anyway we digress....
nivsy is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 17:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,929
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Nivsy

You've had your answers: RAF Fairford is the nearest military base capable of handling the aircraft. It's in a relatively remote location. It has pretty good security and control of access is easier there than at Cardiff. Brize is very busy and probably doesn't need the hassle. Road links to Cardiff are pretty good, especially when you have lots of motorcycle outriders. Finally they won't be paying parking fees at Fairford. What more is there to discuss?
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 20:51
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd rather pay for the security of foreign aircraft supporting an international conference than have them attacked and have an international fvkvp!

Why does someone from Gib give a damn anyway?
Basil is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2014, 22:57
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South of the M4
Posts: 1,637
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
US Forces in UK and Status of Forces Agreement

Brief details in this Parliamentary Paper here:
www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN06808.pdf

which inter alia:
....briefly examines the legal agreements governing the United States Visiting Force in the United Kingdom. The legal basis for the US Visiting Force in the United Kingdom is primarily the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) Status of Forces Agreement of 1951 (SOFA) and the Visiting Forces Act of 1952.
If you serve/served in Germany you are/were covered by a similar SOFA with all the privileges it allowed, the main one I remember when I was there were the tax and duty-free petrol coupons, tax free shopping in the NAAFI etc.
Warmtoast is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2014, 07:58
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: uk
Age: 73
Posts: 94
Received 10 Likes on 2 Posts
I went on a tour of Mildenhall with a relative stationed there. Had to have photo id and be signed in by a service person with ID.

It is more US than anything and the outlets deal in Dollars. IIRC one fast food outlet would accept £ but gave the change in $ & c.

The PX was something else and cheap items everywhere....... Ford Mustang or similar for $30, 000 anyone?

The relative told me that some of his comrades flew in to the base from the US and never went outside the perimeter the whole duration of the tour.
sunnybunny is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2014, 08:59
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
It is more US than anything and the outlets deal in Dollars. IIRC one fast food outlet would accept £ but gave the change in $ & c.
I could never understand why the RAF didnt adopt the same sensible policy. A trip down the route to the far east could necessitate changing money into Cyprus£, Bahrein dinars, Gan cowrie shells and finally Singapore$, with exchange charges at each stage. Dont know what the arrangements in Afghanistan are, but once that has gone and the RAF is reduced to the size of a flying club I dont suppose it will matter any more.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2014, 09:23
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: South Africa
Age: 87
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There used to be a 'Transit Bar' at El Adem, that would accept 'any currency', but the customer had to follow the same rule with his change.

Changing a £1 note for a beer late at night was dangerous.
ian16th is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2014, 09:26
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London
Posts: 189
Received 26 Likes on 5 Posts
It might be an RAF Station, but they can use deadly force. This was outside the B2 hangar a few years ago

topgas is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.