Scottish Defence Force?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: over here
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scottish Defence Force?
I thought about attaching this to the Scots Hamsterwheel thread, but think this place is more appropriate somehow, please excuse me if this has already been discussed but tried the search function already...
Apparently as a part of Scottish independence, there will be a splitting up of the RAF/Army with 16-18 Typhoons, four C-130J's and six Army helos to go North of the border permanently.
That's according to SNP's manifesto anyway. We, in return, will get the Trident base sent South to what remains of the UK.
What do we think? Scotch pie in the sky, or a genuine workable proposition? Is it time for nations to consider dropping national air forces in favour of a NATO (or similar) common force, committed to supporting all member states unilaterally? Or is there a third way?
Apparently as a part of Scottish independence, there will be a splitting up of the RAF/Army with 16-18 Typhoons, four C-130J's and six Army helos to go North of the border permanently.
That's according to SNP's manifesto anyway. We, in return, will get the Trident base sent South to what remains of the UK.
What do we think? Scotch pie in the sky, or a genuine workable proposition? Is it time for nations to consider dropping national air forces in favour of a NATO (or similar) common force, committed to supporting all member states unilaterally? Or is there a third way?
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I went to a parish council meeting the other night. The discussion regarding Mrs Smith's dog fouling the verge and whether this particular location was in a "pick-it-up" zone or not was more structured and subject to far more considered thought/discussion.
They really don't have a clue.
They really don't have a clue.
It's all pie in the sky! The Scots would never be able to afford to run a small number of Typhoons although I suspect British Aerospace would be happy to charge them the earth to try!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 29,897
Received 1,333 Likes
on
604 Posts
Apparently as a part of Scottish independence, there will be a splitting up of the RAF/Army with 16-18 Typhoons, four C-130J's and six Army helos to go North of the border permanently.
Hmmmm and no back up for them.. I wonder how many crews will "defect"
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 58
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
although I suspect British Aerospace would be happy to charge them the earth to try!
Lambs to the slaughter comes to mind, as long as it is independent from the UK
Scottish Defence Force?
You're assuming they actually want to operate them, surely it's just an indication of what they would be entitled to. What an independent Scotland does with it's assets would be up to them - sell to the highest bidder? £126 m each?
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Sussex By The Sea
Age: 78
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
surely it's just an indication of what they would be entitled to
If one gets divorced, one is entitled to a half share after the costs of separation are taken into account. I certainly hope that if Scotland goes its own way the Westminster government screws them over and does not roll over and be a soft touch. I personally dont care if the Scots vote YES, provided they pay the full costs of breaking down the Union - and also that we dont have any Scots in Westminster - that should keep Labour out of power for a generation!
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Age: 30
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The thought of having a Trident base South of the border is nice. Although if I've got this right, the British Armed Forces serve Great Britain, so an independent Scotland will no longer be part of Great Britain, therefore they will no longer get to call their selves British. So, no. Bring the Trident subs to British bases, bring all of our equipment and personnel to Britain and let them have their own armed forces. Fair?
If they want independence then they can have independence, but not at the cost of shrinking our armed forces even further.
Unless of course they want to pay for all of the equipment and personnel. Those Typhoons are pretty expensive, and the Subs will break the bank a bit.
If they want independence then they can have independence, but not at the cost of shrinking our armed forces even further.
Unless of course they want to pay for all of the equipment and personnel. Those Typhoons are pretty expensive, and the Subs will break the bank a bit.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Newt
I notice that some small independent nations in Northern Europe (with populations of 5m) appear perfectly able to operate complex fighter aircraft.
f35.global
These things take time - I wouldn't expect a functioning airforce (tailored to the realistic needs of Scotland) to be ready on the 19th September.
I notice that some small independent nations in Northern Europe (with populations of 5m) appear perfectly able to operate complex fighter aircraft.
f35.global
These things take time - I wouldn't expect a functioning airforce (tailored to the realistic needs of Scotland) to be ready on the 19th September.
Bomber Bomber Bomber! You know that will never happen! Already moved my residence to England! Are you a secret Scot by any chance?
Bclass. Those countries have been independent for ever so have been able to adjust their requirements over a very long period of time. Scotland starts from zero so has little idea of what they need and where they fit into NATO or even Europe. Start up cost will always escalate as they naturally do when it comes to defence cost. Either that or they will remain totally inadequate.
Bclass. Those countries have been independent for ever so have been able to adjust their requirements over a very long period of time. Scotland starts from zero so has little idea of what they need and where they fit into NATO or even Europe. Start up cost will always escalate as they naturally do when it comes to defence cost. Either that or they will remain totally inadequate.
The thought of having a Trident base South of the border is nice. Although if I've got this right, the British Armed Forces serve Great Britain, so an independent Scotland will no longer be part of Great Britain, therefore they will no longer get to call their selves British. So, no. Bring the Trident subs to British bases, bring all of our equipment and personnel to Britain and let them have their own armed forces. Fair?
If they want independence then they can have independence, but not at the cost of shrinking our armed forces even further.
Unless of course they want to pay for all of the equipment and personnel. Those Typhoons are pretty expensive, and the Subs will break the bank a bit.
If they want independence then they can have independence, but not at the cost of shrinking our armed forces even further.
Unless of course they want to pay for all of the equipment and personnel. Those Typhoons are pretty expensive, and the Subs will break the bank a bit.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: cardboard box in't middle of t'road
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the Scots aren't allowed to 'adopt' the pound sterling, Wee Eck says they'll default on their share of the national debt. Now if there were only some assets that were movable and could be moved south of the border quickly to help pay off their share of the defaulted debt. 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: truro
Age: 68
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's all very well being given 16 Typhoons etc.etc. but are there any crews that would be prepared to leave the RAF/RN/ARMY to fly them, I must say as a member of the general, great unwashed public, the thought of Rab C Nesbitt climbing into a Typhoon is slightly concerning, he would never get his headband under his helmet
