Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Flying losses; training vs combat

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Flying losses; training vs combat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Aug 2014, 10:21
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: W. Scotland
Posts: 652
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Only 10% of these deaths were attributable to combat/airworthiness. The other 90% was loosely termed 'aircrew error'.
A statistic that must surely be revised post Hadden-Cave and Phillip?
dervish is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2014, 11:57
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 74
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mind you, training was a littel different in WWI

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-28330113

Last edited by S'land; 8th Aug 2014 at 11:59. Reason: trying to get the link to work - maybe I shouzld stick to WWI technology
S'land is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2014, 22:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what remains of my memory, l believe the RAF received 200 Jaguar bombers in the mid 70s, and by the time l left late 80s, 50 of these had been lost in accidents.

Including 1 shot down in error by a RAF phantom with a dicky arming switch, all for the sake of a bit of "Dymo Tape".
BARKINGMAD is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2014, 08:55
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of a total of around 70 RN Scimitars built nearly fifty percent were written off in accidents. There wasn't even a war on !
4Greens is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2014, 10:20
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of 20 A-4Gs received by the RAN 10 were lost!
dat581 is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2014, 19:54
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Shelton WA.
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, but the Aussies are very careless. Probably left them somewhere beyond the black stump.
Gemini Twin is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2014, 23:21
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nah, mostly just dropped them in the ocean...
dat581 is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2014, 06:53
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The RAAF bought 115 Mirage III's. 39 crashed (hull loss).

22 ejections,
20 pilots injured.
14 pilots killed.

I think training accidents have decreased rapidly for multiple factors over the last 30 years. Systems have improved. They weren't flown by triple redundant fly-by-wire computers in those days, and 'risk management' was simply a calculation on the chance of dying.
Hempy is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2014, 07:37
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ISTR 6 fatalities at Valley between Jan and Jun 66, some of which were glide landings (simulated engine failure) in "manual". A Flying Order was issued "Solo student who experience engine failure are to eject, Instructors are to use their discretion and then eject".
Wander00 is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2014, 13:54
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The RAAF bought 115 Mirage III's. 39 crashed (hull loss).

22 ejections,
20 pilots injured.
14 pilots killed.

I think training accidents have decreased rapidly for multiple factors over the last 30 years. Systems have improved. They weren't flown by triple redundant fly-by-wire computers in those days, and 'risk management' was simply a calculation on the chance of dying.
Yep, these figures are more or less the same for all operators of the early generation Mach 2 fighters. The Belgians lost 40% of their Mirage 5 and 36% of their F-104 fleets, the Germans (in)famously lost 292 out of 916 Starfighters delivered, France lost more than 1/3rd of their Mirage IIIE, and the list goes on and on for most air forces, with very few exceptions (Spain comes to mind).

Wasn't different at all on the other side of the fence, by the way. East Germany lost almost 50% of their MiG-19 and 24% of their MiG-21, while flying far fewer hours than Western air forces. AFAIR, the numbers for other WP air forces were similar or even worse.

At least for European air forces, in addition to the reasons you mentioned, a lot of losses were caused by adverse conditions - low-level flight in bad weather and/or at night, with rather primitive navigation aids from today's perspective.
exhorder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.