Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Any ex Harrier Sqn after a gate guardian

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Any ex Harrier Sqn after a gate guardian

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jul 2014, 16:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,864
Received 2,816 Likes on 1,200 Posts
Any ex Harrier Sqn after a gate guardian

Seem to remember one asking..

Surbiton air cadets to lose iconic Harrier jet over health and safety fears (From Surrey Comet)
NutLoose is online now  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 07:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 627
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
I smell a rat and somebody making more than a few bob out of this. What use to the 'service' are parts from a GR3?
dctyke is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 08:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cardiff
Age: 80
Posts: 65
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Angry

Makes one wonder just what are the Health & Safety risks associated with this airframe are. The fact that it is old is not a hazard in itself. The spokeswoman refers to its deteriorating condition, well assess the risk and put control measures in place to reduce risk to as low as is reasonably practicable (ALARP). I understand that every Cadet Sqn in the country is parented by an active RAF Station which will have a cadet liaison officer. The station probably has access to a Health & Safety professional (in fact a few years ago the ATC had their own H&S organisation, might still have) were they consulted reference the risk assessment process. Seems a shame to get rid of something that motivates the youngsters.
Mickj3 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 08:37
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More likely one of the safety walla's has seen that people go within 30ft of it and have started having cold sweats that they will get sued if someone so much as breaks a nail on it.

Its one of the nice things about moving away from the UK. There is an old Russian steam engine dumped in a play park for kids near me.

The little sods have free range to climb all over it. I have spent hours watching the GF's nephews and nieces playing in that park. Seen a few fall off into the surrounding sand and bounce. Its up to the parents if they deem it to dangerous to play on. they also have a witches cradle and all the stuff we used to have as kids and is now deemed too dangerous in the UK.
mad_jock is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 08:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 527
Received 170 Likes on 91 Posts
Given that it (XZ130) appears to be in reasonable state

Demobbed - Out of Service British Military Aircraft

I suspect it's more to do with the estate manager wanting to absolutely remove any sort of H&S liability from his "plot".

You'd have thought an air cadet unit might be able to access some airframe maintenance instruction occasionally and not short of volunteer labour.
Not_a_boffin is online now  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 08:54
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old Hampshire
Age: 68
Posts: 631
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I smell a missuse of the phrase 'Health and Safety'.
Why is it unsafe?
Is it so corroded it's about to collapse?
Has someone wafted a radiaton counter near it an got a single click?
Did someone forget to disarm the seat and a naughty cadet has nicked the safet pin?
We need to know.
Inappropriate use of 'Health and Safety' is in itself dangerous.
VX275 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 09:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sussex
Age: 66
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I assume the possibility of the MOD wanting to sell the Harrier to the USMC has been discounted?
PhilipG is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 14:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PhilipG,

Why on earth would the USMC want what is essentially an early AV-8? AV-8B is a different beast.
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 14:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: morayshire
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Oh dear...

.....TEEEJ I think that PhilipG's tongue was very firmly in his cheek? Just a possibility?

The Ancient Mariner
Rossian is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 15:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: essex
Age: 76
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't Dave promise that any organization that quoted 'elfin safety' as an excuse would have to explain exactly what the concerns were or am I living in a dream world where people have common sense and children are allowed to play outdoors
mikip is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 16:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I suspect someone has seen how much Jet Art got for their GR.3 at auction...

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 16:21
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EGLL
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"The plane......served in every squadron of the RAF" wrote the hack behind this piece!

A career at the Daily Mail awaits.
G-ARZG is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 16:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mikip- grow up and stop being sensible.
Wander00 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 16:36
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sussex
Age: 66
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My tongue was severely in my cheek.... I think....
PhilipG is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 16:39
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,559
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
If its anything like XM607 at Waddington, then there will be large areas of corrosion on exposed metal, such the jet pipes, leading to some very sharp edges...I am not surprized that the Harrier has been deemed dangerous if it is in a similar condition. The advice at Waddington is that we are no longer allowed to walk under XM607 just in case, although we warn visitors to her that "if you do then on your own head be it". (And no, here is no public money available to put it right).
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 22:46
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Deepest darkest London
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well lets see

1 Sqn has (technically) got a Spifire at a base soon to be vacated

3 Sqn has got one already

4 Sqn - Now theres a possibility...

As for 20 and 233 well they have long gone

V1
Valiantone is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 22:58
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,864
Received 2,816 Likes on 1,200 Posts
I think it was 4 that came on here asking if anyone knew of one, hence the thread, I couldn't find the original thread.,
NutLoose is online now  
Old 30th Jul 2014, 23:34
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IV(AC) Sqn were after the airframe that has just been sold to the public sector. A Business Case was lodged and discounted. These days our RAF Heritage is manned by people who cannot see beyond ££££ especially 100k for a GR3.
Tiger_mate is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2014, 00:07
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Tiger Mate

I very much doubt that GR3 that IV Sqn was after was sold by the MoD for £100,000, more likely a tenth of that figure (or less). The people who sell it on will get that figure (or more).
MAINJAFAD is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.