Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Learjet down over Germany after collision with Eurofighter

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Learjet down over Germany after collision with Eurofighter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jun 2014, 03:26
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Germany: Lear Jet Crashed after Collision with Eurofighter | nsnbc international

A private Lear Jet with two on board crashed after a collision with one of two German Air Force Eurofighter jets above the town of Olsberg, Sauerland, in the German State Nordrhein Westfalen, reports local police. The pilots of the two military planes were training the intercept of an out of communication, civilian airplane. At least one of the two occupants of the Lear Jet has been killed.

Oberst (Colonel) Andreas Hoppe of the 31st Tactical Fighter Wing, said that the pilot of the severely damaged Eurofighter was able of returning his jet to the Nörvenich Air Base near the city of Köln while the pilot of the second Eurofighter landed at Köln Wahn.

Hoppe added that both of the pilots were very experienced and had often executed the same training exercise as the one they carried out Monday morning at the time of the crash. The Air Force spokesman said that he had no information about the causes to the collision and that both of the planes impacted at both their body as well as a wing.

The training exercise, said Oberst Andreas Hoppe, involved the intercept of a civilian plane that failed to communicate with aviation authorities, adding that the Air Force usually establishes visual contact with such planes to guide it to one of the nearest air ports to land. The usual distance between the interceptors and the civilian plane, he added, was normally about 500 to 1,000 meters while the second military jet normally would trail the intercepted plane at a distance of 3,000 meters.
Flugunfall V3

The Luftwaffe has published a press release of the accodent stating that the leading EF and the Learjet were turning left and than the collision happened. Details have not been released and civil and military aviation authorities investigate. Based on what's released it looks like the Learjet rammed the leading Eurofighter in the turn damaging its wing and fuselage and some equipment on the wing. The Learjet crashed, one crew is still missing.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2014, 05:38
  #42 (permalink)  
HTB
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Over the hill (and far away)
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAFENG

Just wondering why the Saarland Prosecutor would want to get involved - the accident happened in Nordrhein Westfalen (NRW) to the NE of Cologne (Olsberg, was that LFA 3?, near the Warburg "pimple"), about 250 miles from the Saarland border.

Mister B
HTB is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2014, 09:18
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bury St. Edmunds
Age: 64
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very sad for all concerned, especially for the families of the two deceased Learjet crew.

Just an observation here, in days gone by this task would probably have been done using a "second line" military aircraft such as a Canberra, OV-10 (Bronco) or perhaps, going back far enough, by a Meteor. All of these aircraft would have been fitted with ejection seats......had they been flying an Alphajet or Hawk their lives could possibly have been saved.

Although such collisions are fortunately rare the risk of such operations is in my view higher than say corporate or airline ops and I question the suitability of some of the aircraft sometimes used to support what is essentially a military flying mission, all no doubt driven by trying to save money not necessarily making the operations safer for the crew. Time for a rethink?
Madbob is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2014, 13:07
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post deleted and poster banned from thread.
dogsridewith is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2014, 14:14
  #45 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Full wings, the 2nd Eurofighter was not involved, was not even close during the collision.
But the Lear and the other one were in very close formation for a long period before the collision. Rumor here says the mission was practicing ways for "forcing an aircraft" to land. Well, if it is true, I am sure they will review the procedures...
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2014, 17:16
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,603
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
Mr B,

I took it from this - perhaps the translation is incorrect and it should be Sauerland ? One of the other articles I posted a link to had a local police spokesman quoting an investigation as well.

"Flugzeugabsturz im Sauerland:Staatsanwaltschaft ermittelt wegen fahrlässiger Tötung" [Plane crash in Saarland: Prosecutor investigating pilot for manslaughter] (in German). Der Spiegel. Retrieved 24 June 2014.
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2014, 18:11
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: EGLL
Posts: 559
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs down

Anyone else find post 17 offensive (understatement)
G-ARZG is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2014, 20:19
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,603
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
G-ARZG,

Actually, yes - totally inappropriate and disrespectful to the professionalism of a military aviator who, let's not forget, managed to bring back his very heavily damaged, asymmetrically configured Typhoon. Imagine what was going on in his head at that time and now. One second he was engaged in a realistic operational training mission and probably having quite an enjoyable day - the next second, 2 fellow aviators are dead and his own world both professionally and personally will never be the same again.
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2014, 21:05
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,603
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
A German Air Force spokesman in Berlin has apparently stated that they believe the Learjet pilot was to blame for the collision - on the basis that the Typhoon was hit from below and lost a tank - "of course we want to wait for the conclusive report, but ...". The Federal Bureau of Aircraft Accident Investigation stated "pure speculation, one of many possible variations". The Learjet's flight recorder has been recovered for analysis.


Air force blames dead pilot for crash - The Local
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2014, 01:11
  #50 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
For those who don't know, Germany is a nation of laws. Aircraft fly in formation under the rules of the air plus the appropriate sortie briefings. For a collision to occur, in the absence of other failures, somebody breached the rules, however inadvertently. The Germans are identifying which pilot was at fault under the regulatory framework in place. It's the same as a road traffic accident in Germany - somebody will always be held at fault under the rules of the road. The fact that 2 tragic deaths occurred doesn't change the way the authorities will review the accident. It's not personal, it's a legal requirement.
Two's in is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2014, 06:07
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
These German Air Force comments are exceptionally unusual and prejudicial at this stage when our knowledge of the facts is, to say the least, incomplete. Firstly, issuing a public commendation to a pilot just involved in a fatal collision then releasing an statement emphatically blaming the dead pilots, before even their remains have been found! Had it been the typhoon which went down and the management of the target company acted like this, it would rightly have caused the most furious outcry on these pages!
ShotOne is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2014, 07:33
  #52 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Presumably both Typhoon pilots will know?
BOAC is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2014, 08:39
  #53 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,378
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
A German Air Force spokesman in Berlin has apparently stated that they believe the Learjet pilot was to blame for the collision - on the basis that the Typhoon was hit from below and lost a tank
I was the FA when we had a mid-air between a LU F4 and a Canberra when doing a VID.

Late break-away and a very hard pull later the F4 pilot felt a bump and thought he'd flown through the Canberra wake. The Canberra diverted with a Mayday and a ruptured wingtip tank.

Inspection on the ground showed witness marks on the bottom of the F4 wing and horizontal tail and the missile rail pushed back 3-4 inches. The canberra wingtip tank had gone between the F4 missile rail and underwing tank scoring both. An either side or up and both would have been lost.

Lesson? Just because the damage was to the underside/tank of the Eurofighter doesn't, necessarily, make it the Learjet crews fault. Wait for the BOI result.
ORAC is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2014, 20:49
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
These German Air Force comments are exceptionally unusual and prejudicial at this stage when our knowledge of the facts is, to say the least, incomplete. Firstly, issuing a public commendation to a pilot just involved in a fatal collision then releasing an statement emphatically blaming the dead pilots, before even their remains have been found! Had it been the typhoon which went down and the management of the target company acted like this, it would rightly have caused the most furious outcry on these pages!
True. Sadly, this isn't the first example of poor PR handling by German armed forces officials.

Both pilots killed were ex-military aviators.
exhorder is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2014, 10:01
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rumour: The EF is said to be damaged beyound repair.
Kerosene Kraut is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2014, 16:19
  #56 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was (is?) a British company that used to provide the targets for RN and RAF training. Based at Hurn IIRC
Lon More is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2014, 17:19
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Cobham plc, Lon.
diginagain is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2014, 18:01
  #58 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had Flight Refuelling in my mind so not so far out.
Lon More is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2014, 18:18
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Usual Wiki-caveats apply: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobham_plc

Last edited by diginagain; 23rd Jul 2014 at 18:46.
diginagain is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2014, 18:51
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Fife
Posts: 271
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FRADU (Fleet Requirements and Aircraft Direction Unit) were redesignated 736 Naval Air Squadron last year and moved to Yeovilton as I understand it.

Not sure what the breakdown between them and Cobhams was.

Had a trip with them out of Lossie many moons ago against the Ark Royal.

Lots of fun pretending to be Exocets at 50 feet!

Last edited by Coochycool; 23rd Jul 2014 at 19:06.
Coochycool is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.