Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Which aircraft Is more effective in the ground attack role: Harrier or Apache?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Which aircraft Is more effective in the ground attack role: Harrier or Apache?

Old 28th May 2014, 11:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: England
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which aircraft Is more effective in the ground attack role: Harrier or Apache?

I normally would have said the Harrier, because of the bomb load it can carry and it's versatility. but my friend seems to think the opposite, and that the Apache is much better at attacking ground targets.

we can't decide between the two, do any of you clever chaps (preferably people who know about these aircraft) know the answer?

I hope you can help because you guys are a lot smarter and more knowledgeable on the subject than I am! :P

thanks
Typhon111 is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 15:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,153
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Depends upon one's definition of "effective" as that will decide the winner of this mini-competition.

And the threat.

And the distance.

And the immediacy of the requirement.

And the requirement.

Etc.....etc....etc.

Didn't mean to be flippant but there are no winners or losers in these things, they each have differing capabilities. Think of one scenario and one will be more effective, think of another and the other will be.

And who's Harrier are you talking about? USMC? Spanish? Italian? Indian? If they each still have them?
just another jocky is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 16:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The MOD decided that did they not?

The Harrier's are in the scrap yard and they are talking about buying more Apaches.
Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 16:09
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
You are assuming the MoD make decisions purely on effectiveness?

How long have you been in, Bob, all day??
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 16:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A-10
tonker is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 16:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One should have faith in One's Leaders, surely!

Loyalty alone demands that I should think?













Anyone whose length of service exceeds Reveille knows "effectiveness" is the last thing to be considered when those on high make decisions.
Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 17:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Harrier was replaced by the Tornado in Afgahnistan -so replacement doesn't come into it! In terms of putting munitions on the target the Harrier could clearly deliver a lot more and was due to add Brimstone to its arsenal.
RileyDove is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 18:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lechlade, Glos.UK
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Actually, to toss a spanner into the works, and from one who flew Jaguars for 10 years, I truly believe that the Canberra B57G was the best. I did not have the good fortune to fly it, but did tours on B15/16s and B(I)8s. We could carry Nuks, rockets, missiles, cannons, napalm, retard and free fall bombs, flares, could fly 1000 miles at low level, cruise at 60,000 feet and all for the price of a bottle of beer
sharpend is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 20:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the heathen lands
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'ground attack' also needs defining - in CAS terms, Apache wins hands down...
cokecan is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 20:15
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 202
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
As previously mentioned there is no real winner as their capabilities are different. But having served on the ground in Helmand I found the Apache to be more effective in Strike but the Harrier for ISTAR.

The Apache was very handy with its load of 30mm, Rocket and Hellfire. 30mm being devastatingly accurate and plenty of it, rockets would bring down tree lines nicely and the Hellfire was great for accurate punch. The problem we had down South was that it couldn't hang about too long compared with Harrier.

The Harrier could sit nice and high to watch with its pod and could remain on station for a decent time which was probably it's most handy trait for us. It could provide serious impact with larger bangs than Apache, great for simultaneous strike. And great for clearing crowds etc with 200' show of force.

At the end of the day the Taliban was a fan of neither and they both did great jobs!

LZ
Hot_LZ is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 20:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
from one who flew Jaguars for 10 years
A dozen takeoff's was it?
Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 21:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,343
Received 2,546 Likes on 1,075 Posts




.......
NutLoose is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 21:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in the mess
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AC-130.
nice castle is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 22:10
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 70
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Its a pity that in the air to ground role we are limited to these two only. My personal bet would be a fully kitted B52 doing a full WW3 drop. I'm sure that buckets of sunshine have more punch than a couple of 500 lb LGBs. But then, like the Harrier, the Nuke Bomber is a thing of the past.

Smudge
smujsmith is offline  
Old 28th May 2014, 22:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,062
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Perhaps in the RAF, not elsewhere however.
West Coast is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 00:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Westie,

MPA is gone....Harrier is gone....Tornado's are scarce as Hen's Teeth....Tristar's gone....VC-10's....it is almost easier to figure out what is left than what is gone.
Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 11:26
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dead Dog Land
Age: 77
Posts: 531
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Probably a dumb question but was it possible for the harrier to fire weapons at slow ground speed or the hover ? Just had a vision of one lurking behind something, rising up, firing off something and then beetling off.
The Oberon is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 12:29
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Harrier Lurking behind something then shooting an unsuspecting target?

Either the target would be about five miles up-wind or completely stone deaf to not tweak to the presence of the Harrier hovering!

The things are are louder than a Convention of Mother-in-Laws!
Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 12:37
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: UK
Age: 40
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A-10
Don't worry according to the not at all insanely biased chaps at f16.net the F-35 is the perfect replacement CAS and ground attack unit for the A-10 because... uhm... 5th generationand stuff... you know.
Whitewhale83 is offline  
Old 29th May 2014, 18:41
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,103
Received 295 Likes on 186 Posts
Since our opening poster didn't actually tell us what the target was, it is hard to answer his question.

Building?
Harrier
Column of armor?
Apache
Some other targets: either.

Infantry in the open: Apache with that lovely chain gun.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.