Air Cadets grounded?
Last time I checked there was a total lack of accommodation available at Predannack, though they could bed down in the control tower I suppose. Or, as Shelter Box has a training facility onsite maybe they could make use of some of the charity's surplus boxes? The whole saga could be classed as a disaster, after all.
Predannack Survives
Whilst the Predannack (surviving) looks good in practice what you get is a facility miles away from centres of population and with poor transport links.
It ticks the conventional gliding box well due to its size and multiple directions availability, but needs accommodation and closer tech back up.
It would make sense if it could also be used as a base for week courses with staff from other areas running it (like the old Halesland operation) if of course the staff actually exist by then.This would at least make better utilisation of the facility and give a better return on any money spent.
It ticks the conventional gliding box well due to its size and multiple directions availability, but needs accommodation and closer tech back up.
It would make sense if it could also be used as a base for week courses with staff from other areas running it (like the old Halesland operation) if of course the staff actually exist by then.This would at least make better utilisation of the facility and give a better return on any money spent.
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Norwich Airspace Confliction with Swanton Morley
I think that Norwich ATC will have an issue (probably with respect to IFR approach and arrival procedures) when they are operating RW09. No doubt this will be a point of discussion that will need to be concluded prior to any decision to move a VGS into Swanton Morley.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: LONDON
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Opportunity for 614 VGS at Wethersfield?
A new 'mega prison' could be built on Wethersfield MOD site in Braintree and Tendring (From Braintree and Witham Times)
If the option for a prison was to go ahead and it was to be built in the right place then that might pave the way for all or part of the airfield to be retained for the VGS. Even a sizeable prison would need only a relatively small portion of the MDP Wethersfield estate. A prison might even be contained in the area away from the airfield. An idea anyway, and a compromise solution.
If the option for a prison was to go ahead and it was to be built in the right place then that might pave the way for all or part of the airfield to be retained for the VGS. Even a sizeable prison would need only a relatively small portion of the MDP Wethersfield estate. A prison might even be contained in the area away from the airfield. An idea anyway, and a compromise solution.
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Out in the desert
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the option for a prison was to go ahead and it was to be built in the right place then that might pave the way for all or part of the airfield to be retained for the VGS.
They need to look further into the future and build for the future. Personally, hubs with overnight accom and concurrent activities are the way forward.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Peg
The prision at Wayland was build donkeys years before the airfield site was closed. RAF Watton was open even when the Prison was open and the Prison does not encroach on the airfield site.
RAF Watton closed because the Radar facility was no longer required (superceded) and the Watton Airfield site was sold because DIO wanted to sell it (simple as that). Actually the main users of the site (apart from the VGS) was USAF C-130 traffic (rough field and unprepared strip training for which they provided their own fire engine !!) from Mildenhall. Some para jumping and some rotary wing traffic (minimal). USAF said they had no real further use for it and bingo............... airfield sold (with undue haste and for well under what it was worth).
I expect that Wethersfield will 'do a Coltishall' and build a prison, some houses and bit of light industrial on the site. The requirement for a VGS site means nothing to DIO or the Treasury................
Arc
The prision at Wayland was build donkeys years before the airfield site was closed. RAF Watton was open even when the Prison was open and the Prison does not encroach on the airfield site.
RAF Watton closed because the Radar facility was no longer required (superceded) and the Watton Airfield site was sold because DIO wanted to sell it (simple as that). Actually the main users of the site (apart from the VGS) was USAF C-130 traffic (rough field and unprepared strip training for which they provided their own fire engine !!) from Mildenhall. Some para jumping and some rotary wing traffic (minimal). USAF said they had no real further use for it and bingo............... airfield sold (with undue haste and for well under what it was worth).
I expect that Wethersfield will 'do a Coltishall' and build a prison, some houses and bit of light industrial on the site. The requirement for a VGS site means nothing to DIO or the Treasury................
Arc
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Salisbury
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Regional hubs may be the answer, but where are they going to build the overnight accommodation? Who are they going to get to staff the accommodation? Who is going to prepare the meals these cadets are going to eat?
If it is anticipated this burden will fall to the VGS staff, then I would suggest there would be fewer and fewer staff. Has this idea been fully thought through or are the powers that be just working on the assumption that volunteers will be only too willing to help out with a greater workload...
To my mind, the only via option for the VGS organisation to work with a reduced footprint is to move to permanent, paid staff in key roles, and supplemented with volunteers.
If it is anticipated this burden will fall to the VGS staff, then I would suggest there would be fewer and fewer staff. Has this idea been fully thought through or are the powers that be just working on the assumption that volunteers will be only too willing to help out with a greater workload...
To my mind, the only via option for the VGS organisation to work with a reduced footprint is to move to permanent, paid staff in key roles, and supplemented with volunteers.
??
Regional Centres may well be coming, however the concern I have is that, in order to maximise the weekend it is likely that travel on the Friday evening will be required. This raises the issue of squadron staff, having worked a full day at their day job, being required to transport cadets to a VGS that could be a couple of hours drive away (for some). There are implication for Drivers Hours with this approach that I am unsure have been considered.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: LONDON
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Travelling Distances to Swanton Morley for (Volunteer) Staff
Regional Centres may well be coming, however the concern I have is that, in order to maximise the weekend it is likely that travel on the Friday evening will be required. This raises the issue of squadron staff, having worked a full day at their day job, being required to transport cadets to a VGS that could be a couple of hours drive away (for some). There are implication for Drivers Hours with this approach that I am unsure have been considered.
614 VGS (good luck to them) needs to somehow retain these volunteer staff if it is to deliver anything approaching the required capability/output as a 'regional centre'. It is important that someone seriously considers staff retention in the selection of a new operating site.
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Out in the desert
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
....however the concern I have is that, in order to maximise the weekend it is likely that travel on the Friday evening will be required.
Pegasus hi, see you point, it's little different from the local squadron having a 2hour drive to Cranwell for AEF. However to maximise the VGS time I suspect some sqns may go the night before. If Swanton Morley gets reactivated then fine, if not then its likely that a trip to Syreston for East Anglian (and wider) based units, will be required hence my earlier suggestion. Happy to be proved wrong though
Last edited by brokenlink; 25th Feb 2017 at 20:25. Reason: Spelling!!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: LONDON
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pegasus hi, see you point, it's little different from the local squadron having a 2hour drive to Cranwell for AEF. However to maximise the VGS time I suspect some sqns may go the night before. If Swanton Morley gets reactivated then fine, if not then its likely that a trip to Syreston for East Anglian (and wider) based units, will be required hence my earlier suggestion. Happy to be proved wrong though
I think you would find that if the Swanton Morley option were to be taken then it would be numbers of 614 VGS staff who were realistically able to attend on a regular basis (or attend at all) that would have by far the biggest impact on output.
Perhaps there is a better option than Swanton Morley - to cut down travelling distances for cadets and staff alike.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: LONDON
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But any arrangement needs to maximise staff availability/attendance if the Air Cadet gliding organisation is to be able to get the most out of the gliders it will have at some point in the future.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts