ZZ999 - what then?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ZZ999 - what then?
I see that RAF aircraft serial numbers have now reached the ZZ prefix. Presumably there's a cunning plan to move to something new when (if ever) we reach ZZ999? Start again at AA?
Since ZZ can quite comfortably get to 999, I don't think it's much of a problem. If a crisis occurs, they could 'capability gap' AA, making it A_A. Perhaps?
CG
CG
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,803
Received 135 Likes
on
63 Posts
That had been puzzling me too, in those idle hours of ... What were we talking about? Oh, yes, serials.
A mate told me there's a Committee at the Air Box looking into it. They are taking advice from BT, who have proven skills in making numbering sequences completely incomprehensible, and DVLA who live on another planet but are experts in irrelevant letters and numbers. Accordingly the results won't be known until 2019
I see two options ... Either AAAnnn or nnnAA. Or hexadecimal, starting at 0.
(Oops, that's 3 options, or 10 in Hex IIRC ... Or is that binary?)
A mate told me there's a Committee at the Air Box looking into it. They are taking advice from BT, who have proven skills in making numbering sequences completely incomprehensible, and DVLA who live on another planet but are experts in irrelevant letters and numbers. Accordingly the results won't be known until 2019
I see two options ... Either AAAnnn or nnnAA. Or hexadecimal, starting at 0.
(Oops, that's 3 options, or 10 in Hex IIRC ... Or is that binary?)
The sequence for aircraft serial numbers started with 5 numbers, and ended
at 10000, to be replaced by a letter and 4 numbers. This lasted until Z9999,
which was followed by 2 letters and 3 numbers, as at present. The logical
next step is 3 letters and 2 numbers - so it will not be that, will it!
at 10000, to be replaced by a letter and 4 numbers. This lasted until Z9999,
which was followed by 2 letters and 3 numbers, as at present. The logical
next step is 3 letters and 2 numbers - so it will not be that, will it!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The way the RAF is shrinking there are enough numbers left behind the ZZ prefix to see the Service into its second decade!
The question of what comes after ZZ999 is likely to arrive sooner than some people think. Yes there are blocks of numbers that were never used previously but all the small UAS used by the army have a military serial and the way these get lost / smashed the unused blocks will disapear quickly. Its annoying the hell out of the spotters who can't tick them off in their little books.
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: UK East Anglia
Age: 66
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
VX275, Not sure if you were at the same meeting as me with ADRP back in 2000 where he suggested he give registration numbers to all our parachutes. That sure would have used all the numbers up! I managed to talk him out of it but he was pretty insistent over ORION.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,763
Received 2,750 Likes
on
1,171 Posts
All they have to do is transpose them, eg 001AA
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: cardboard box in't middle of t'road
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Come on guys and gals, there's been 2 posts insinuating the Army/Navy takeover of the RAF and nobody's bitten. It's either getting old or you all have the BS filter active. 
It's either getting old or you all have the BS filter active.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North of the UK's no.1 aircraft carrier parking spot
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't see what everyone is worried about...all of the ZZxxx serials have been out of sequence (e.g. C-17s ZZ17x, just so '17' could appear in the serial), 51 Sqn RIVET JOINTs so they could get their 6+6+4+6+6+5+6+6+6=51 'signature' allocation, and so on.
The Typhoon fleet is somewhat nearer to reality (ZK3xx range), therefore fear not pretty much forever more with hardly any (if at all) serial blocks of ZL/ZM(except the F-35s)/ZN/ZP/ZR(a few helos)/ZS/ZT (one Lynx)/ZU/ZV/ZW/ZX/ZY being used so far.
The Typhoon fleet is somewhat nearer to reality (ZK3xx range), therefore fear not pretty much forever more with hardly any (if at all) serial blocks of ZL/ZM(except the F-35s)/ZN/ZP/ZR(a few helos)/ZS/ZT (one Lynx)/ZU/ZV/ZW/ZX/ZY being used so far.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
British serial numbers are often given to aircraft destined for export, so that eats up a few (very few, unfortunately). As VX275 mentioned, Serials are given to the numerous military model aeroplanes that we now have and, as I read it, these can only multiply.
Tengah Type gave us the real clue but it seems to have been lost in the subsequent crayoning. At the dawn of military aviation, the Air Committee Joint Numbering System was created and set the convention. So, unless we gash the Convention in favour of popular fashion, it's probably 3 letters followed by 2 numbers.
UK Serials is interesting.
Tengah Type gave us the real clue but it seems to have been lost in the subsequent crayoning. At the dawn of military aviation, the Air Committee Joint Numbering System was created and set the convention. So, unless we gash the Convention in favour of popular fashion, it's probably 3 letters followed by 2 numbers.
UK Serials is interesting.
There are a lot of gaps - to confuse the enemy about production. The unused registrations could be used. But with the current size of the RAF, I don't think it's going to be a problem for a while yet!
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sussex
Age: 66
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought that I heard on the radio this morning that the EU wants the UK to change the number plates on cars, outlawing personal numbers etc, so no doubt they will issue an EU directive on the future of military aircraft numbering.....