Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Mysterious delta jet over Texas, a fortnight ago

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Mysterious delta jet over Texas, a fortnight ago

Old 29th Mar 2014, 18:39
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,110
Lockheed Polecat has 2 engines, but I thought that it had been shelved...

Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2014, 22:13
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not a huge sand box but very nice winters anymore
Age: 55
Posts: 548
Twin engine contrails so all the single engine drones are out.
saudipc-9 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 14:32
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
No they aren't. Contrails are formed by wingtip vortices, not a function of number of engines.

My money is on an X47B
ShotOne is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 14:38
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,960
Originally Posted by ShotOne View Post
No they aren't. Contrails are formed by wingtip vortices, not a function of number of engines.

My money is on an X47B
Hempy is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 15:25
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 25,997
Condensation trails can be caused either by pressure reduction, for example in wing tip vortices or by engine exhausts.

If you ever saw a Buccaneer flying a blown overshoot on a damp day, you'd see a plethora of such pressure reduction trails.
BEagle is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 15:46
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 26
Contrails formed by pressure drop are short lived. Trails formed by engine exhaust are usually longer lived, depending on atmospheric conditions. The ones in the photo are definitely exhaust generated.
NickPilot is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 16:11
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Did I Tell You I Was A Harrier Pilot
Posts: 79
Vapor trails that are formed by wingtip vortices never persist because the low pressure area disappears as the vortex quickly dies, whereas those formed by engines persist because of the water vapor added by the combustion process in the engines. Index finger to glasses, glasses adjust...
DITYIWAHP is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 16:21
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
DITY, if we're talking about high level contrails, they are caused by the jet exhaust, specifically the water content, being mixed by wingtip vortices. Hempy, if you were to take another picture 30 secs later you'd see two contrails. Beagle, what you say about pressure drop is true but doesn't much help identify our mystery machine; we're talking tens of thousands of feet over Texas not Honington on a drizzly morning.

Last edited by ShotOne; 30th Mar 2014 at 17:06.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 17:35
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not a huge sand box but very nice winters anymore
Age: 55
Posts: 548
Shot- you would either have to have the jet under G or have lift devices deployed for what you are referring to and as has been mentioned are short lived and are not present at the altitudes this aircraft was flying. The photo shows engine contrails emitting from the aircraft. What the vortices do afterwards is irrelevant.

Last edited by saudipc-9; 30th Mar 2014 at 17:48.
saudipc-9 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 17:45
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Where the heart belongs
Age: 53
Posts: 389
No they aren't. Contrails are formed by wingtip vortices, not a function of number of engines.
Doncha just love amateur hour
Sideshow Bob is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 18:01
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Read my post in the context of the question being answered, Bob. It's simply not possible to state how many engines this aircraft had just by looking at the contrail.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 18:22
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 1,998
Jet engines eh?

So all those Flying Fortresses I saw during the war were running on jets after all.

So the USA invented the jet engine and flew it before Germany or GB?

Real education this thread.
langleybaston is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 18:26
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 93
Posts: 1,947
I think they scrapped all the X/YB-35s...
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 19:11
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 200
So all this is telling me is high altitude stealth is a bit pointless if your in the contrail layer?

The only airframe(s) I know of that has fewer contrails than engines is because 40% of the engines fitted where shut down for most of the flight.
dagenham is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 21:09
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,877
if we're talking about high level contrails, they are caused by the jet exhaust, specifically the water content, being mixed by wingtip vortices.]
Bloody hell. All that time watching the VC10's contrails and apparently the exhausts were mixing with the wing tip vortices!!
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 21:40
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 25,997
I don't know why it's all such a mystery?

Surely it was just one of these on test:

BEagle is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 21:45
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dorset,UK
Posts: 425
Sea Vixen?


I'll get my coat!!
Compass Call is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 22:13
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not a huge sand box but very nice winters anymore
Age: 55
Posts: 548

Here's an interesting video
saudipc-9 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 22:25
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Yes they were, Roland. Are you postulating that contrails from aircraft with tail mounted engines behave fundamentally differently from others? I'd challenge you to tell those of, say, an MD80 and a 737 apart a minute after they'd passed.

That said, I feel the contrail debate is a red herring; my money is still on the (single engined)X47B for the much more basic reason that the planform looks like it. This isn't the 50's with dozens of exciting projects. Even if some new mega plane had somehow been funded and built in super-secrecy, would it reallly be cruising over Texas in broad daylight?
ShotOne is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2014, 22:28
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not a huge sand box but very nice winters anymore
Age: 55
Posts: 548


This one is for Shot. If you're telling me that the vortices mix the contrails, fair enough. However, that is not what your post said "Contrails are formed by wingtip vortices". This is also why, in order to ID the number of engines, that you would look very close to the aircraft itself. However, given the video and the similar contrail pattern from the original picture may very well show a UAV.
saudipc-9 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.