Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Harry quits flying

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Harry quits flying

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jan 2014, 22:10
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wilts
Age: 58
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just applied last week on JPA for a job based in Horse-guards, SO3 clubbing in Kensington and Chelsea or something like that.
I've already got an oyster card so must be in the running.

Fingers crossed and waiting to hear from my deskie.

130.
Hatchet 130 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 11:59
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 82
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
130

You will have a long wait. I expect that whatever desk you are flying at the moment is perfectly suited to your talents, potential and intellect. What is it by the way?
Clockwork Mouse is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 12:17
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by smujsmith
Has Harry announced he will no longer fly anything ? I suspect not, and like all aircrew assigned to the mahogany bomber, maybe he'll keep his hand in "just in case".
Is there an AEF nearby?
diginagain is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 12:27
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no requirement for him to keep his hand in on something he will never fly for real. If and when he returns to the AAC to do a second three year flying tour, possibly as a Sqn Comd or 2IC, he will do a refresher course on whatever aircraft he is assigned to. The system works.
Genstabler is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 13:16
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,756
Received 2,740 Likes on 1,166 Posts
Reading the thread, everyone appears to be assuming this posting was of his own doing, not the Armies....

Does anyone really know?
NutLoose is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 13:39
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Racedo - you are very naughty and I fear the Tower beckons.
Gen's response was correct, it was a crass comment from me and I apologise and deleted it, it more suited to JB than a professional forum.
racedo is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 13:46
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone really know? Only he and his personnel branch.

However, he has just completed a full flying tour, his Regiment is based in London, he is due a staff posting, this SO3 post in HQ Londist is ideal for him, round post in round hole. Unless one is an ignorant, republican conspiracy freak, what the hell is the problem?
Genstabler is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 13:47
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good for you racedo.
Genstabler is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 14:02
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm no Royalist but the lad has done his time in the front line

Pity they are (apparently) giving him a staff job working so close to his family - it would have been better if he'd gone to work on procurement or even HR for the lower ranks
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 15:29
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HH
Why is it a pity? Better for whom? He's in the Household Division and has a lot of experience and knowledge relevant to his new post. What would be the point of deliberately sending him away from his home base to a post for which he has no aptitude or experience, apart from satisfying the antis? Round peg. Round hole.
Hope you don't have anything to do with personnel or career management because you have very odd priorities.
Genstabler is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 17:52
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a pity because it will be perceived that it's a cushy number working with the Palace, No.10 etc etc

Surely they could have found something a bit different for him to do - 2 tours by anyone in Afghanistan after all is experience that shouldn't be wasted by organising ceremonial duties - there must be a herd of (useless) SO's who would love to do that
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 18:38
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those who want to will perceive anything to do with any Royals as a fix. It isn't. It's a sensible and logical decision. Live with it.
Genstabler is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 20:03
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
2 tours by anyone in Afghanistan after all is experience that shouldn't be wasted by organising ceremonial duties - there must be a herd of (useless) SO's who would love to do that
Whilst not equating operational service with ceremonial duties, its a big mistake to regard this job as a jolly which could be done by any "useless" SO.

Public duties in London include large ceremonial parades which are in effect state occasions, and present the public face of the army to thousands of people. The value to the country in terms of overseas tourist revenue must be very great, and can be compared in PR terms to the Red Arrows, etc. Not a job where you want cock-ups.

I am reminded of an old Irish Guards officer chum of mine (now sadly deceased), who told me he was in charge of a defensive position somewhere up country in the Radfan in the early 60's. As they were keeping their heads down to dodge accurate incoming rifle fire from the dissidents, his sergeant, who was ducking down beside him muttered - "It'll be good to get back to London to do some real soldiering again, sir!"
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 21:41
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pastures new
Posts: 354
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It concerns me not one bit what the fourth in line to throne does as a job....he'll be outside the top 10 in a generation, but I am troubled that the RAF requires a 6 year return of service for an OCU whereas the army has sufficient taxpayer's money to allow its pilots to disappear after only 3 years.
kintyred is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 21:45
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by hangarshuffle
It would be better for all the Royals if they got out into our country, get real jobs
You think the acheivements on Princes William and Harry as front line helo pilots don't count as real jobs? They weren't given their wings because of who they are, the earnt them, same as everyone else has to. They have both distinguished themselves in ops. I know it doesn't suit your argument to acknowledge these facts, but statements like yours do nothing for the credability of your post - whatever the point of it was. To be honest, I lost interest in it after that rather obvious vitriol. Sorry.

Originally Posted by Genstabler
If you are not cap badged AAC, you do your flying training followed by a three year tour as a squadron pilot. You then revert to your own cap badge and do further tours at regimental duty or on a staff. Harry is a captain so he has been given an SO3 staff appointment at HQ London District, one for which he is ideally suited. He may be asked at a later date to return to the AAC for a further flying tour, possibly as a Squadron Commander.
Thank you for that, Gen. Lots of people here clearly did not understand that and obviously need to; not that it it's likely to make their ignorant rants any better infomed, but that's fine.

Last edited by Courtney Mil; 18th Jan 2014 at 22:21.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 22:15
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
We have a Monarchy -whether we like or not.

Personally I think it is the least worst form of constitutional arrangement we could have, given our long proud island history and disastrous flirtation with Republicanism/Theocracy in the 1650s and Euro-Communism prior to the crash of 2008 (discuss!). What's the alternative today? President Dave or Comrade Secretary General Millibland?

The Firm (immortalised in Princess Squidgy's words) is very good at PR - just look at the way it was rehabilitated into the national consciousness after the PR nightmare of Mrs Al-Fayed's death: We have had a genial, accessible young chap marry a middle class girl, a 'multi-culti' Diamond Jubilee, a roguish young JO on detachment in Las Vegas that we can all envy and admire in equal measure. Hell, even ‘Wills and Kate Ltd’ have begun to trademark their ‘brand’.

And yes - the Royals are going to have a cushy time of it: parties, polo and pate. Wouldn’t you if all that money was available? (earned…or given? Discuss!!). I have stated on record on previous threads that a bespoke wings course at Cranditz, a very accelerated captaincy Q on SAR and very carefully and safely managed tours as a FAC/Apache pilot, is nothing more than PR spin for a 24-hour news society obsessed with knowing far more than they need to about the Royals.

Yes the boys may want nothing more than to go on ops and be subjected to the same sh!te that the rest of us had to endure; but due to their constitutional position, they never will. We have to accept it for what it is: the preparation for the heir and the spare to take their places in the Firm in due course, all under the watchful eye of the media, vocal republicans, the establishment and us.

Just my 2p anyway.
Training Risky is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 22:34
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TR

Tell me, how does the military make a safe tour for an Apache pilot / gunner when they are shooting at the enemy that are shooting at troops on the ground and always the chance of an RPG being fired at them ?

"and very carefully and safely managed tours as a FAC/Apache pilot, is nothing more than PR spin".

"And yes - the Royals are going to have a cushy time of it: parties, polo and pate."

Sound like what a lot of ex RAF officers on here have expressed as spending non flying hours doing (well, the parties and pate part), the third part could be added for Guards officers.

Last edited by 500N; 18th Jan 2014 at 22:48.
500N is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 22:38
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
500N, well put.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 22:55
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just my 2p anyway
What a waste.
Genstabler is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2014, 23:10
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Cheers Dits.
Training Risky is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.