Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UK Maritime Patrol Aircraft - An Urgent Requirement

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK Maritime Patrol Aircraft - An Urgent Requirement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jan 2015, 21:01
  #881 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Betty Swallox

Buy a capable MPA, it's essential for the security of the UK............it's also the only way to stop this thread !
A and C is offline  
Old 11th Jan 2015, 21:49
  #882 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Planet Claire
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would it be so hard to take a dozen Orions from the boneyard???

Uncle Sam would prolly donate them.

It's still quite a decent MPA, and there's loads of the things in storage...
AtomKraft is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 01:10
  #883 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 594
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
But they have Air Engineers, the RAF in its wisdom don't train them anymore
fergineer is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 03:43
  #884 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The US of A, and sometimes Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A and C.
Fair point!!
betty swallox is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 05:54
  #885 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swindonshire
Posts: 2,007
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
Betty - I have a feeling that Anglian may have been making a barbed comment about our approach to procurement rather than a serious suggestion? (At least, I hope so...)
Archimedes is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 09:12
  #886 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oz
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A quick search to check what India and the Australians are paying for P8 vice the P1 unit cost is interesting. If Mr Wiki is to be believed , P1 comes in a hell of a lot cheaper. Lets face it, its also a hell of a lot more capable.
P-8 less capable than a P-1??? Errm...huh?

Australia is paying for a system, not just 8 airframes. We're buying new sims, new mx facilities, new GCSs, a US-based initial training system, in-country software labs, and establishing several forward support facilities.

India's P-8Is are likely a bit exxy due to the NREs associated with them being bespoke in nature, i.e. MAD, some indigenous capabilities, and some substituted hardware and software due to releasability issues.

Not sure how anyone can possibly assess what a P-1 would cost when Japan has only ordered development and pre-production examples so far, and no one else has looked closely at the costs of establishing it as part of a wider system.
FoxtrotAlpha18 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 11:08
  #887 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: W. Scotland
Posts: 652
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
in-country software labs
I know nothing about MPA, but remember many failed MoD attempts to do the same. We always seem to start with good intent but then this blind faith kicks in that the US will give us anything we want. Many tales of software code not being released and resulting cost and problems.
dervish is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 12:25
  #888 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm, airframes, simulators, software support, American training, that's going to cost! Then you need people. Is rear crew training part of Mfts, to supply wsos and wsops to the mpa ocu? If not, that's going to cost.

Also if this really is a requirement I hope we look at all airframes not just p8.
grousehunter is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 14:38
  #889 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Question

I hope we look at all airframes not just P-8
What would you suggest?
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 15:09
  #890 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grouse

Whatever we buy all those costs will be incurred

The important thing is to buy SOMETHING 'cos right now we have nothing

One would hope that we'd buy the most cost-effective aircraft but...............
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 15:17
  #891 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Dervish, we have had successful software labs. The Nimrod and Tornado ADV were two. The E3 was outstanding; we hired Boeing engineers initially. We could then discuss suggestions face 2 face with the software team and advance concepts faster than in the US.

Typhoon also has its in-service support.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 15:59
  #892 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The US of A, and sometimes Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basing what Wiki says re capability of the P-1 versus the P-8A...


Well done you.
betty swallox is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 16:27
  #893 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: home: United Kingdom
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Ford or a Toyota?

Hopefully, the Renault and Seat are out the picture!

Duncs
Duncan D'Sorderlee is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 16:43
  #894 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Outside the Matz
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No need for sarcasm mate, This is a discussion forum.
I like the P8 , I want the P8 but I also accept that it it is not the be all and end all - yet.

"The P-8A capabilities to meet the
ASW, ASuW, and ISR objectives will be delivered incrementally to the aircraft requiring continued research and development while full rate production continues for the baselineaircraft."


http://comptroller.defense.gov/Porta...ns.pdf#page=24
Bannock is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 17:30
  #895 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The US of A, and sometimes Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...if you can't take sarcasm, PPRuNe probably isn't the site for you...
Just sayin'...
betty swallox is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 17:40
  #896 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Outside the Matz
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair one !

Confessed faults are half mended.
Scottish Proverb

Enjoy Burns Night !
Bannock is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 17:56
  #897 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The end of the thread is nigh.

The average member of the British public will neither understand or want any of the many requirements stated on Prune for MPA on this thread, and I dare say the average cabinet minister would either.
We are an island nation and trade and migrate accordingly over the oceans.
To that end in the future we will simply purchase an aircraft that is or has the following:
Reliable and reasonably modern and commercially viable, like what good airlines buy.
Long or very long range from a UK runway.
Has radar and other modern aids to locate people unfortunate enough to be in and at the mercy of the seas.
Be able to communicate and therefore steer other rescuers to the scene.
Possibly drop aid to people in the water.
And fly back to the UK again without crashing, or running out of fuel and crashing.


Seriously, that's about it. Its fag packet stuff. If we cant, and lets face it, we cant, organise even this, then we should give up, which we have.


But in the future, cleverer and better British generations will work this out and simply do it, but I fear I will take a catastrophe to force them to it. Now please....end this thread.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 18:42
  #898 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are an island nation and trade and migrate accordingly over the oceans.
To that end in the future we will simply purchase an aircraft that is or has the following:
Reliable and reasonably modern and commercially viable, like what good airlines buy.
Long or very long range from a UK runway.
Has radar and other modern aids to locate people unfortunate enough to be in and at the mercy of the seas.
Be able to communicate and therefore steer other rescuers to the scene.
Possibly drop aid to people in the water.
And fly back to the UK again without crashing, or running out of fuel and crashing.


Seriously, that's about it.
So what is really needed is just a long range/long endurance SAR platform? Really? That could be done very cheaply with a decent radar installed in any number of biz jets or even a biz turbo prop. If a multi-role capability is desired so the airplane could be used for something else between SAR missions, then the C-27J would make a good and relatively cheap platform. USCG is doing exactly that.
KenV is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 19:24
  #899 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
To that end in the future we will simply purchase an aircraft that is or has the following:
Reliable and reasonably modern and commercially viable, like what good airlines buy.
Long or very long range from a UK runway.
Has radar and other modern aids to locate people unfortunate enough to be in and at the mercy of the seas.
Be able to communicate and therefore steer other rescuers to the scene.
Possibly drop aid to people in the water.
And fly back to the UK again without crashing, or running out of fuel and crashing.
Well that's SAR covered, but what about all the other requirements? Thank goodness you aren't in charge of procurement.
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2015, 21:25
  #900 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
RP, until HMG release, of find, funds you could put COCO the clown in procurement.
Pontius Navigator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.