FJ use of Transponder Mode C
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FJ use of Transponder Mode C
In the 80's and 90's I had the pleasure of operating unpressurised turboprops in Scottish airspace. Many of our routes were on Air traffic advisory routes. Air traffic did their best to provide separation from the (then) plentiful fast jet traffic but this was severely hampered by the fact that the big majority of the contacts had no height information. This very much increased the stress and difficulty, especially when there was weather to avoid as well. As a result ATC sometimes had to endure the buttock-clenching experience of watching two contacts merge. Mode C presumably must have been fitted. Was there some operational reason why it was mostly turned off?
Always turned on in my F3 Tornado.
Don't know whether it provided reliable data when either low level or doing combat manoeuvring - maybe that was the problem?
Only had 1 airmiss, due to an airliner cutting the airway corner out of Newcastle into uncontrolled airspace at night, then him taking visual avoiding action into me instead of away. We had a video of the radar to prove who was in error.
Don't know whether it provided reliable data when either low level or doing combat manoeuvring - maybe that was the problem?
Only had 1 airmiss, due to an airliner cutting the airway corner out of Newcastle into uncontrolled airspace at night, then him taking visual avoiding action into me instead of away. We had a video of the radar to prove who was in error.
.Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bouncing around the Holding pattern
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We do and straight after departure get a C check to verify. There may have been a problem with height info at low level perhaps?
And it's not OUR airspace, but if a relatively un-manoeuvrable airliner wants to deviate from the myriad of airways available to save time and cash then the captain takes his/her chances in Class G, and should get all snooty when fighters dare to be in his/her way. Or worse, dare to have the danger areas segregated so the original flight plan must be followed. Danger areas where we also wear C.
Rant off, Happy New Year, safe aviating.
And it's not OUR airspace, but if a relatively un-manoeuvrable airliner wants to deviate from the myriad of airways available to save time and cash then the captain takes his/her chances in Class G, and should get all snooty when fighters dare to be in his/her way. Or worse, dare to have the danger areas segregated so the original flight plan must be followed. Danger areas where we also wear C.
Rant off, Happy New Year, safe aviating.
Ah, it's Have_a_go_at_F3's Day. (mods, we need a gallic shrug shoulders icon)
1. If you operate in uncontrolled airspace, know what you are doing. This guy didn't.
2. We didn't build the radar, just tried to get the best out of it.
3. Incomplete radar pictures were common for almost all air defence aircraft at that time, which is why all AD crews were trained immediately for 4-ship leads as anyone might have the best air picture.
4. Never heard of individual IFF codes, but that was nav **** anyway
1. If you operate in uncontrolled airspace, know what you are doing. This guy didn't.
2. We didn't build the radar, just tried to get the best out of it.
3. Incomplete radar pictures were common for almost all air defence aircraft at that time, which is why all AD crews were trained immediately for 4-ship leads as anyone might have the best air picture.
4. Never heard of individual IFF codes, but that was nav **** anyway
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hove
Age: 72
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mode S is no better at times. There's a C130 and a Tornado going around with the same 24 bit ident, both in the air at the same time last month.
Wonder if that confused the poor old controllers with the different data coming in.
Wonder if that confused the poor old controllers with the different data coming in.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't forget, fox3 the airline pilot didn't have any radar picture at all, never mind an incomplete one. It's surely not surprising a fighter pilot in a small light-grey aircraft would be first to spot a big brightly coloured one with rows of lights?
Turbine hot,pleased to hear you did use mode C but I assure you lots didn't. (Lossie jaguars?) Airline traffic use airways as much as possible but not always. Sometimes to save fuel and cash as you say, although you somehow manage make this sound a grubby aspiration (the Queen doesn't buy our fuel). Other times, like my opening post, because there is no airway.
Turbine hot,pleased to hear you did use mode C but I assure you lots didn't. (Lossie jaguars?) Airline traffic use airways as much as possible but not always. Sometimes to save fuel and cash as you say, although you somehow manage make this sound a grubby aspiration (the Queen doesn't buy our fuel). Other times, like my opening post, because there is no airway.
Always flew with Mode C selected, as did everyone else. Short of a switch-pigs or a unserviceability I am not sure why anyone would not have it selected in the UK as our procedures called for it.
I've no idea how anyone who does not have an interrogator can state that 'lots' don't have Mode C active.
I've no idea how anyone who does not have an interrogator can state that 'lots' don't have Mode C active.
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mode C
In the 80`s there were Military ATC units that didn`t have SSR or a link from other units.
At Brawdy, the old original AR1 was used until about 1989. It was fantastic at showing in great detail all the moisture, rain, birds and occasional shipping. On a good day, the aircraft picture was superb although any conflicting traffic had to be de-conflicted with either London sector 23 or avoid!
To us, SSR was for sometime in the future and therefore we didn`t have to worry about the legalities surrounding verification, ident, Mode C accuracy etc.
At Brawdy, the old original AR1 was used until about 1989. It was fantastic at showing in great detail all the moisture, rain, birds and occasional shipping. On a good day, the aircraft picture was superb although any conflicting traffic had to be de-conflicted with either London sector 23 or avoid!
To us, SSR was for sometime in the future and therefore we didn`t have to worry about the legalities surrounding verification, ident, Mode C accuracy etc.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"I've no idea how anyone could state...." The clue was several times a day, receiving ATC messages along the lines " ..high speed traffic two o'clock closing rapidly, no height information."
If the passengers could have heard, they'd have walked!
If the passengers could have heard, they'd have walked!
Fox3
How would you know if your Mode C was "always turned on in [your] Tornado" if it was "Nav **** anyway"? Have you got the longest neck in NATO to see behind your seat on what was selected?
By the way - try copying this pic...
Shrug it off and don't listen to the nasty boys; they're only jealous!
LJ
How would you know if your Mode C was "always turned on in [your] Tornado" if it was "Nav **** anyway"? Have you got the longest neck in NATO to see behind your seat on what was selected?
By the way - try copying this pic...
Shrug it off and don't listen to the nasty boys; they're only jealous!
LJ
Oap
The reason why you would be asked to squawk individual codes would be so we didn't barrel into the wrong formation at low level and so we knew that we had the correct one we had briefed to do affil with. Do you remember those days? When within a 60x30 mile box there might be 4-5 four ships or pairs transitting at low level?
By the way, you couldn't get a weapons solution on an IFF return in the F3, it needed to be an established primary RADAR comtact.
LJ
The reason why you would be asked to squawk individual codes would be so we didn't barrel into the wrong formation at low level and so we knew that we had the correct one we had briefed to do affil with. Do you remember those days? When within a 60x30 mile box there might be 4-5 four ships or pairs transitting at low level?
By the way, you couldn't get a weapons solution on an IFF return in the F3, it needed to be an established primary RADAR comtact.
LJ
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Dim and distant past but was it not mandated to switch Charlie off if you were squawking low level and not receiving a service?
You had not had a Charlie check with the controller he would have been a brave man giving altitude separation based on unverified data.
Just a thought.
You had not had a Charlie check with the controller he would have been a brave man giving altitude separation based on unverified data.
Just a thought.
"I've no idea how anyone could state...." The clue was several times a day, receiving ATC messages along the lines " ..high speed traffic two o'clock closing rapidly, no height information."
I'm sure an air trafficker of the period will be able to help.