Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Which Multi-Engine route?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Which Multi-Engine route?

Old 16th Sep 2013, 20:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: London
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which Multi-Engine route?

The RAF Multi-Engine stream is currently the most diverse for trainees in terms of the number of platforms available after the award of brevet.

The question is, which type would you opt for (given the choice), with knowledge of both military flying and post military prospects for the inevitable exodus to the civil world for those who don't climb the ranks?

My picks and reasons for those would be as follows:

99 Sqn - C17 - More diverse than Voyager, some proper military flying with a modern jet fleet.

32 The Royal Sqn - HS 125 to BAE 146 - Flying all over Europe and into theatre more and more often, flying and mixing with very interesting individuals, lifestyle.

70 Sqn - A400M - Real military flying into austere locations. Possibility of crossover to SF.

10 Sqn - Voyager - ATPL + Type Rating on A330, fast track to easy street on a modern jet.

That leaves: Sentry, Rivet Joint, Shadow, C130s, Sentinel, Islander...
Force For Good is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 00:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
C-17's without a moment's hesitation followed by C-130's.....but commonsense would say the A-330 for a handy transition to Civvie Street.
SASless is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 03:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Annapolis, MD
Age: 86
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wot SASLess said.

Bob C
Robert Cooper is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 06:17
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zummerset
Posts: 1,041
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
FFG,
"Real military flying into austere locations. Possibility of crossover to SF". You want to work a bit harder and get to Chinook!

Joking aside, if a MEXO was still available then I'd look at C17 (been back and forth a few times in it - it does seem a most pleasant platform) or C130J. For RAF career terms get into A400M early doors, for longer term then Voyager is sensible but probably not 'real military flying'.
Evalu8ter is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 06:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd go C-130 because of the sheer number of different things it does - Low Flying, Stores Airdrop, Paradrop, Unprepared Landing Zones, Search and Rescue, AAR, Maritime Reconnaissance - all day and NVG. Oh and it also does routes round the world.
I originally thought C-17, but it turns out that it is only used as Strategic Airlift and has no tactical or real 'military' flying in the RAF, just hump stuff from airport A to airport B.
Factor in that to get from A to B in a C-130 means you have to stop over in a lot more places and see a bit more of the world instead of just taking off from Brize and landing directly at destination.

A400M after a good few years in service will get some similar capabilities as the C-130, it definitely won't be doing anything remotely interesting until good ol' Qinetic/ Boscombe get their teeth into it. So just repeat what I said about C-17. Oh, and you're having a giraffe about SF, right? Have you see the size of that thing?

Number two would be 32(TR) Sqn on either HS125 or BAe 146. Again the variety of routes is huge, NOT just Europe, and you do get some time in theatre doing something vaguely military instead of being a corporate jet all the time.

10 Sqn, Voyager, I (personally) would consider as a last tour, only to get some fan time and Airbus Flight Deck. I can't say the tanker job particularly appeals to me but maybe as a crusty old Captain who's ready to leave I could do it for the A330 TR! Along the same lines is the Global Express type rating of the Sentinel on 5(AC) that makes a recipe for some serious moneymaking outside of the RAF.

ISTAR platforms in general are not going to have exciting flying and I heard you end up walking around with 5 degrees of left bank when you come back from a particularly long sortie.

Sentry, I don't know much about but I'm not sure they're taking people anymore?

Shadow is similar to Sentry/ Sentinel, but with a King Air. Though much like a fighter you are squashed into your seat with the amount of stuff you're wearing but have the added pleasure of being almost literally shoulder to shoulder with the guy next to you and unlike other ME aircraft you can't easily get out of your chair to use the facilities!

I know literally nothing about the RJ and the Islander/ Defender is Army!

Obviously this is all tongue in cheek and is my somewhat cynical opinion, but If you joined the RAF to flying something military in a military fashion the C-130 and eventually A400M are the only real tactical ME aircraft. The rest, whilst doing a military job, are not tactical in the slightest with the exception of the C-17 doing occasional steep descents and 146s doing route detachments in Afghan.

Standing by for incoming...
kharmael is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 07:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 653
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
P-8A Poseidon
Seriously though, it would be interesting to see the throughput of pilots if the RAF/RN ever go down this route. A 737 rating opens up a lot of options when the domestic life becomes an issue.
Party Animal is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 08:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A remarkable number of people are plotting escape routes from the mighty C17
MechGov is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 09:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm not sure I'd worry too much about type for transition to civi.
I left the RAF, current on Chipmunks, on to Viscounts; although perhaps previous 4 x Dart experience swayed the selection.
Approaching retirement at 55, I fought to remain on B75/76, confident that they would afford the best chance of another appointment - nothing doing on those so accepted the offer of B747. In that outfit we'd a guy who'd gone rotary, short tour on Hercs and then did well on the Jumbo.
OTOH I could be completely wrong
Basil is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 13:34
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
Will the P8 be a 737 Type rating?
SASless is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 13:48
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
P8, you might find some ex RAF trying to get back in.

A garunteed job until retirement would be a blessing.
More lookout is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 15:08
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 653
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
SASless,

Will the P8 be a 737 Type rating?
I understand the initial cadre of test and evaluation pilots required a 737 course/rating before flying the P8 but I'm not entirely sure how this will translate to front-line pilots. However, same engines, airframe and flight deck (roughly), so can't see why not.

Perhaps some current P8 pilots may wish to comment?
Party Animal is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 16:23
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South of Watford
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to agree with Basil and say go for the type/role that most interests you. Starting your RAF career with half an eye on a commercial TR ignores the fact that you might be on a completely different aircraft type as you approach an option point or even in a ground role. In addition the requirements in the commercial world change so rapidly that what might seem like a sound decision now soon becomes completely irrelevant. So take this opportunity to pick an area/role/location/potential RAF career path you really want to do. Good luck.
pitotheat is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 16:55
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
As the Navy is doing some interesting and common stuff with P-3's and the P-8.....I get the impression from talking to some folks in the loop that the Navy knows it has the wrong airframe in the choice of the P-8 and would have been far better off updating the P-3.....that thinking the P-8 is a lead pipe cinch to be around for long might be a stretch.
SASless is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 17:18
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Holding?

I am on an AEF where we have a holding pilot aged 27 awaiting a Hawk Course.

One of the pilots he did basic with got axed with the 170 pilots and is now a qualified Airbus co pilot at Manchester. I have flown with him so...

Depending on how much holding one gets on the multi route I would suggest you bin the RAF right now and get on a CTC course this year.

I am sure a multi tour would be fun but hanging around waiting for the RAF to train you is a serious impediment to your future prospects.

The holding pilot may get his Typhoon moment but his mate will be a training Captain by the time he bails out into civvy street.
Bigpants is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 19:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Fortunately, the RAF selects its pilots for roles based on their capabilities and where those are needed, not where said pilots can best feather their nests for an early opportunity to jump ship and profit from their RAF training and experience.

Sorry, for a moment there I thought I was writing a holier than thou post on PPRuNe. Back with you now.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 19:15
  #16 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Bigpants - you did however skip the bit about the £100k plus bill for the Airbus driver's ticket, and also the bit about having fun while you earn, at least for the first half of your career
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 19:19
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do yourself a favour, get on the pensions calculator and have a look at what the offer looks like for your average mate currently on the OCU. Then consider no fly pay till past OCU, the effect this has on pay progression. The salary and offer for existing mates is a joke; there are plenty who want fast jet, but for a man, I can't see why any young, motivated intelligent pilot would want to serve past their initial return of service. 12 years fighting pointless wars have seen to that.

I don't know many 1st tourists currently approaching tourex who intend to stay past their return of service.

It's not as if the loss of 100% fp will make much difference, it accounts for **** all of their pay.

Those with grandfather rights to afps can sit in ivory towers. We are truly headed for a manning disaster if things pick up firmly in 2015.

Last edited by VinRouge; 17th Sep 2013 at 19:20.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 19:34
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
The disaster is creeping ever closer and I don't think anyone has an answer. Pay is just one part of the package but I was slightly surprised to be chatting to a guy who would be leaving at his IPP having climbed to the lofty heights of middle band flying pay - at the same age I was firmly at 'enhanced'.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 19:49
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fun?

I think some of you have missed the point, perhaps deliberately, not sure.

27 and still holding? Explain the fun in that?

I joined after a four year sandwich degree and had a 1000 hrs Hawk aged 28.

I do not believe the modern RAF is delivering a career to its people full stop and the future does not bode well.

But the recent experience of RAF pilots seems awful to me (endless holding followed by over committed to Op Tours) and yes it can cost £100k to get into a good civvy flying job but some of those that do are driving DB9s around Dubai and still paying off their debts in quick time..

I did not encourage my kids into to the mob and neither did most of my friends.
Bigpants is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2013, 19:53
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 46 Likes on 22 Posts
Not that it matters much with the poor PAS uptake, but if the chap I referred to above did stay in he would move on to PAS at around Level 14 rather than the traditional Level 20. This has quite a serious impact on the pension!
Just This Once... is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.