Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Decision Making in Hijacking Situations - Not About Today's Incident

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Decision Making in Hijacking Situations - Not About Today's Incident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th May 2013, 17:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wilts
Age: 53
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Decision Making in Hijacking Situations - Not About Today's Incident

I remember reading a paper recently during some of my studies looking at the decision making process and that in hindsight it was obvious what was going to happen, but when engaged in the incident itself, with the information at hand, things went a different way.

I have tried to find the paper again following today's events but can't find it.

The incident in question I believe involved an airliner coming across the Sinai desert and Israeli interceptors, some information being provided to the intercept crews, but not all. The area ops centre had other information. I am sure the crew conducted a VID of the aircraft. I also think there were some comms issues with the airliner which is why the fighters were scrambled. In hindsight the decision made was wrong, but at the time, was (potentially) the best information available.

The paper was in the formal literature and all I remember reading was summary papers of it as I couldn't download the full paper.

Does anyone know what incident I am talking about and any potential links?

I found it after someone pointed me in the right direction.

Lanir, Z., 1989, The reasonable choice of disaster-the shooting down of the Libyan airliner on 21 February 1973, The Journal of Strategic Studies, 12(4), pp. 479-93

Happy for thread to be locked unless someone wants to add to the discussion, or provide a link to somewhere other than Taylor and Francis for the article.

Regards

Last edited by Been There...; 24th May 2013 at 17:34.
Been There... is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.