Dornier DO 31
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: troon
Age: 61
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dornier DO 31
An interesting way to use Peggy Engines ....
Dornier Do 31 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I wonder what this Aircraft could have done with the final variant of the Pegusus Engine to power it.
What do you Engineering types think?
Dornier Do 31 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I wonder what this Aircraft could have done with the final variant of the Pegusus Engine to power it.
What do you Engineering types think?
Or with 4 x 23500lb podded Pegasus rather than 2 x 15500lb versions and 8 4400lb lift jets, much more thrust, much less drag which I think was the technical problem first time around.
Would also benefit from modern FCS technology for simple transitions as per the VAAC Harrier and subsequent F35 control laws.
Wouldn't be Stage iii compliant though
Would also benefit from modern FCS technology for simple transitions as per the VAAC Harrier and subsequent F35 control laws.
Wouldn't be Stage iii compliant though
i assume another issue was that a single pegasus engine failure was presumably catastrophic in several parts of the flight envelope. just about tolerable with a harrier, but not normally ok with something that could carry pax. i guess the 2 front seats were martin baker?
I remember seeing (and certainly hearing!) the Do-31 at the 1969 Paris Air Show. That was the 10-engined version which was capable of VTOL flight and it demonstrated its capabilities most impressively!
Visit the Dornier museum at Friedrichshafen and you can see the Do-31, together with many other rare Dornier designs.
But not the Do-217 or Do-335.....
Visit the Dornier museum at Friedrichshafen and you can see the Do-31, together with many other rare Dornier designs.
But not the Do-217 or Do-335.....
This was the one that the MRT Force was waiting for in the 60's. Waiting and waiting...
Armstrong Whitworth AW.681 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Armstrong Whitworth AW.681 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While we are looking back at old VTOL contenders, or equipping old models with new engines, could we poke the French to making the 'Rafale son of Balzac' (sp)
It was fast and looked good in its original form IMHO
It was fast and looked good in its original form IMHO
Do a Hover - it avoids G
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry chaps the notion that old jet VSTOL contenders failed just because they were short of thrust is too simple. They all had problems with one or other of these things (sometimes both).
1 There was no provision for keeping the hot efflux out of the intakes.
2 The lift systems left little room for anything else.
Putting more thrust in to such designs would not have helped and with some aircraft (D031 for one example) would have made matters worse.
1 There was no provision for keeping the hot efflux out of the intakes.
2 The lift systems left little room for anything else.
Putting more thrust in to such designs would not have helped and with some aircraft (D031 for one example) would have made matters worse.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or the Breguet Br.1030.
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/foru...772.0/all.html
Planned test aircraft:
Intended transport development:
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/foru...772.0/all.html
Planned test aircraft:
Intended transport development:
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do-31
In addition to Beagles find, there's another (which you can walk through) at the Deutsches Museum collection at Oberschleißheim near Munich.
Also look here:
Deutsches Museum: Oberschleissheim Airfield, Information
Also look here:
Deutsches Museum: Oberschleissheim Airfield, Information
I don't think they were crazy, sisemen, simply trying to satisfy their prospective customers demands. Their customers anticipated a war in which the first targets would be every single runway, military and civil. Bristol Engines and Hawkers came up with a solution, but that created its own re-supply and support problems. These various transport projects sought to satisfy that demand, though I grant with varying degrees of reality.
Did you know that the TSR2 was to be VTOL enabled with a Shorts VTOL airborne aircraft carrier? Now that was crazy!
Did you know that the TSR2 was to be VTOL enabled with a Shorts VTOL airborne aircraft carrier? Now that was crazy!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
John,
Nice post as ever.
If any visitors would like to find out more about the various V/STOL ideas tried, a good place to start can be found at Vertical and/or Short Take-Off and Landing (V/STOL), where you can find the quite wonderful 'V/STOL Wheel'. It shows no less than 45 ways of trying to do what Hawkers achieved with the Harrier.
If nothing else, it should give anyone a better appreciation of just how good those designers, engineers and pilots at Kingston (and Bristol) were.
Best Regards as ever
Engines
Nice post as ever.
If any visitors would like to find out more about the various V/STOL ideas tried, a good place to start can be found at Vertical and/or Short Take-Off and Landing (V/STOL), where you can find the quite wonderful 'V/STOL Wheel'. It shows no less than 45 ways of trying to do what Hawkers achieved with the Harrier.
If nothing else, it should give anyone a better appreciation of just how good those designers, engineers and pilots at Kingston (and Bristol) were.
Best Regards as ever
Engines
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Why oh why would I wanna be anywhere else?
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I guess what I meant by 'crazy' was the 'pushing the envelope' think tank mood which was exploring the options until the inevitable dead end hit them. You only have to look at the list of weird and wonderful projects and prototypes that abounded in the latter stages of WW2 and the immediate post-war period. Once the dead-ends had been sifted and sorted it kind of settled down into a conventional design paradigm with the occasional "outside the square" advance.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: troon
Age: 61
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the link Engines. I never realized just how many VTOL Designs were out there - and also how many of them relied upon Rolls Royce to power them! I'm a big fan (Sorry for the pun) of Not reinventing the wheel and as such I think Rotordyne should be revisited. Whould an updated design of this Aircraft really need Tip - jets?
Al
Al
According to Flight a week or two ago, the departing head of Eurocopter predicted a rennaisance in helicopter travel, citing new, faster & lower operating cost developments based on their X3 design, whose lineage you can trace back to the Rotodyne. As always I suppose it was an idea ahead of its time.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Athelnick,
In my view, yes, an updated Rotodyne would still need tip jets, because that gave it the very low weight, zero torque rotor propulsion system it needed. No gearboxes, no transmission shafts - just hot gas ducts from the two turboprops in the wings.
That said, Fairey had big problems with the stainless steel ducts, which had to double as rotor blade spars. The other big issue was noise from the tip jets - but they were a long way down the track of a silencer design.
I actually watched the aircraft land at Battersea Heliport - and it was VERY loud.
Best Regards as ever
Engines
In my view, yes, an updated Rotodyne would still need tip jets, because that gave it the very low weight, zero torque rotor propulsion system it needed. No gearboxes, no transmission shafts - just hot gas ducts from the two turboprops in the wings.
That said, Fairey had big problems with the stainless steel ducts, which had to double as rotor blade spars. The other big issue was noise from the tip jets - but they were a long way down the track of a silencer design.
I actually watched the aircraft land at Battersea Heliport - and it was VERY loud.
Best Regards as ever
Engines
I'm a big fan (Sorry for the pun) of Not reinventing the wheel and as such I think Rotordyne should be revisited. Whould an updated design of this Aircraft really need Tip - jets?
The Rotodyne did not need massive helicopter transmission systems and only operated in tip-jet mode for vertical take-off or landing. For the rest of the flight, the rotor operated in free-wheeling autogyro mode, with additional lift from the stub wings which housed the main engines - another source of programme delay, courtesy of Napiers.
Just as the production version's specification was being signed-off, the much-underrated Rotodyne died under a Conservative government several years before Wilson and his fellow-travellers killed TSR2, HS681 and P1154. A pity; had it been developed than the Rotodyne could perhaps have been a pioneering inter-city airliner and military transport
Nowadays you'd have to find a 'killer application' for the Rotodyne to be resurrected and there simply doesn't seem to be one.
It was certainly more viable than the Do-31.
Last edited by BEagle; 9th May 2013 at 20:16.