Here it comes: Syria
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
As Vilnius is in Lithuania and Lithuania is in NATO, Putin may consider Vilnius for New York a double win.
As for Russia's end game I submit that is too far in the future. In the near term I think he is more concerned with reesatablishing Russia's Cold War sphere of influence. Some of this is not possible as the Warsaw Last countries are deeply embedded in Europe but the Baltic States, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are much easier targets.
Russia lost its Mediterranean ports and anchorage so reestablishing their Syrian port is a logical step.
As for Russia's end game I submit that is too far in the future. In the near term I think he is more concerned with reesatablishing Russia's Cold War sphere of influence. Some of this is not possible as the Warsaw Last countries are deeply embedded in Europe but the Baltic States, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are much easier targets.
Russia lost its Mediterranean ports and anchorage so reestablishing their Syrian port is a logical step.
Last edited by Pontius Navigator; 13th Apr 2018 at 11:58.
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: over the rainbow
Age: 75
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mark Galeotti is a highly regarded British academic with deep insight into Putin's mindset.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Galeotti
In this short recording dated February 2017, he was prophetic about Putin v Trump.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Galeotti
In this short recording dated February 2017, he was prophetic about Putin v Trump.
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ORAC,
Good to see the discussion going into the tech. direction, not political.
Why sea only? It works over solid ground, too. But talking about East Med, water matters, indeed.
I did not mean that kind of a radar, but more "classic" ones, with some 3000 km range.
Direct identification is of course not possible, but simply excluding "friends" we get "foe".
As for "highly jammed", it depends on particular wave length.
It would be very hot around 10 GHz, but OTHRs typically operate in the 2-30 MHz window.
I would be interested to see a jammer for this bandwidth.
Good to see the discussion going into the tech. direction, not political.
Why sea only? It works over solid ground, too. But talking about East Med, water matters, indeed.
I did not mean that kind of a radar, but more "classic" ones, with some 3000 km range.
Direct identification is of course not possible, but simply excluding "friends" we get "foe".
As for "highly jammed", it depends on particular wave length.
It would be very hot around 10 GHz, but OTHRs typically operate in the 2-30 MHz window.
I would be interested to see a jammer for this bandwidth.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Russia hasn't got a long range OTH radar which covers the region. They do have a newer coastal OTH, "Sunflower", but only back in Russia and not covering the area. Even if they had its VHF band and eminently jammable.
I did a tour based at 280SU in Cyprus back in the day - I wish you luck. Ignoring all the air traffic talking to Nicosia, Tel Aviv etc there are many many more operating autonomously talking to nobody doing various surveillance tasks - none of whom could arbitrarily designated as a foe.
Direct identification is of course not possible, but simply excluding "friends" we get "foe".
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Nobody has. The mountain terrain north, east and west precludes a long range OTH and Syria and Lebanon don’t have coastal VHF surface wave radars. Israel probably has - but that wouldn’t help the Syrians much.
Russia claiming they have evidence of who carried out the chemical attack on Douma. Can you guess who they say the evidence implicates ....
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-m...-idUSKBN1HK24P
JAS
“We have .. evidence that proves Britain was directly involved in organizing this provocation,” defence ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said during a televised briefing.
JAS
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
The Iranians will believe them. We are the “Little Satan” after all - and they have long believed we are the Machiavellian schemers leading on the gullible Americans...
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In a roundabout way it’s a compliment; even during Cold War they believed all James Bond gadgets were real, and they’ve used the phrase “licenced to kill” in present crisis. But none of that turns bombarding Syria, with the possible exception of confirmed CW sites, into a good idea.
Feels like a bit of a set-up for a strike on UK military locations or ships/aircraft i.e. if Russians are killed during a strike on Syria, attacking British mil is a slightly less confrontational way of seriously hitting back than hitting US mil. They are certainly are pretty p***** off with the UK for the global reaction to Salisbury. Testing Britain, NATO and Trump, with just enough to leave some wriggle-room to de-escalate
It’s an odd one. The “it could have been staged by the rebels” and “what good can come of intervention?” viewpoints were really starting to gain traction in the UK; in fact General Jonathan Shaw was making just that point on Sky News when he was inexplicably cut off earlier today. The tide was certainly running against action, in my view anyway. This accusation by Russia makes it a lot harder for those viewpoints to get a fair hearing and if anything strengthens the Government’s case for action. Do we think Russia actually *wants* us to attack so that it can exploit divisions in the aftermath?
Russia claiming they have evidence of who carried out the chemical attack on Douma. Can you guess who they say the evidence implicates ....
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-m...-idUSKBN1HK24P
JAS
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-m...-idUSKBN1HK24P
JAS
Iran's news agency Fars, which is heavily linked to the government, claimed a number of British forces were being held captive by the Syrian army in the Eastern Ghouta region near the capital Damascus.
The report, quoting the Lebanese news channel al-Mayadeen’s correspondent in Moscow, added the forces were captured after “infiltrating” the region for the last month as part of a plot involving “terrorists and NATO forces" to attack Damascus.
The report, quoting the Lebanese news channel al-Mayadeen’s correspondent in Moscow, added the forces were captured after “infiltrating” the region for the last month as part of a plot involving “terrorists and NATO forces" to attack Damascus.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: cheshire
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is all starting to look rather complex, and definitely not helped by Trump's first "missiles are coming" tweet (which must have had the US miltary top brass doing somersaults!).
Although the Maybot is an inadequate fool, I do feel for her right now as she's kind of damned if she does and damned if she doesn't. If I was in her position I'd pluck for the parliamentary vote and keep fingers crossed it gets voted down - then at least she can say she tried. And, in the meanwhile hopefully things will de-escalate.
I'm not exactly one for appeasement, but as somebody pointed out above, with two lunatics in charge of things (Putin and Trump) the last thing we want to do is provoke even further, surely?
Although the Maybot is an inadequate fool, I do feel for her right now as she's kind of damned if she does and damned if she doesn't. If I was in her position I'd pluck for the parliamentary vote and keep fingers crossed it gets voted down - then at least she can say she tried. And, in the meanwhile hopefully things will de-escalate.
I'm not exactly one for appeasement, but as somebody pointed out above, with two lunatics in charge of things (Putin and Trump) the last thing we want to do is provoke even further, surely?
It’s an odd one. The “it could have been staged by the rebels” and “what good can come of intervention?” viewpoints were really starting to gain traction in the UK; in fact General Jonathan Shaw was making just that point on Sky News when he was inexplicably cut off earlier today. The tide was certainly running against action, in my view anyway. This accusation by Russia makes it a lot harder for those viewpoints to get a fair hearing and if anything strengthens the Government’s case for action. Do we think Russia actually *wants* us to attack so that it can exploit divisions in the aftermath?
a distinct smell of fish detected!
Although the Maybot is an inadequate fool, I do feel for her right now as she's kind of damned if she does and damned if she doesn't. If I was in her position I'd pluck for the parliamentary vote and keep fingers crossed it gets voted down - then at least she can say she tried. And, in the meanwhile hopefully things will de-escalate.
Trump on air now.
US, UK and France have launched strikes.
AP reporting explosions heard in Damascus.
Pentagon briefing in 50 minutes.
EDIT : Interestingly, both aircraft and ships used - JASSM and Stormshadow?
Strikes reported in several districts around Damascus.
Already video on Twitter.
CNN reporting RAF Tornado GR4s fired Stormshadows at facilities around Homs.
US, UK and France have launched strikes.
AP reporting explosions heard in Damascus.
Pentagon briefing in 50 minutes.
EDIT : Interestingly, both aircraft and ships used - JASSM and Stormshadow?
Strikes reported in several districts around Damascus.
Already video on Twitter.
CNN reporting RAF Tornado GR4s fired Stormshadows at facilities around Homs.
Last edited by tartare; 14th Apr 2018 at 01:45.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SWAPS Inner
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts