Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Here it comes: Syria

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Here it comes: Syria

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Oct 2016, 18:07
  #1821 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,356
Received 1,565 Likes on 712 Posts
Manager of largest Aleppo hospital reports it has been struck again repeatedly in a series of of air attacks; a mixture of barrel bombs, including chlorine, and cluster bombs.


https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...leppo-hospital

Last edited by ORAC; 1st Oct 2016 at 19:01.
ORAC is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 00:18
  #1822 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,283
Received 498 Likes on 207 Posts
So the Syrians and its Shia allies in the Region are going to finally kick the Opposition forces out of Aleppo.

I am sure Obama and Kerry shall give them a stern talking to about that.

Oh...sorry....the Shia are tied to the Iranians and we know how many Iranians there are pulling Obama's Strings.

Very opportune time for all those Billions of Dollars and other Cash Payments to wind up in the Iranian Coffers.


US officials said they were seeing signs that thousands of troops from across the Shia world - including Syrian regime soldiers, Iranian Revolutionary Guards, Hizbollah fighters, Iraqi militiamen and Afghan mercenaries - were massing for a final assault on Aleppo.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016...-as-hospitals/
SASless is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 02:30
  #1823 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,754
Received 2,738 Likes on 1,166 Posts
Russia warns US not to intervene as hospital is hit in latest Aleppo blitz


Russia warns US not to intervene as hospital is hit in latest Aleppo blitz
NutLoose is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2016, 03:16
  #1824 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,283
Received 498 Likes on 207 Posts
Sorry...we don"t even call Islamic Terrorists "Islamic" so must be you are a bit confused about these Insurgents!



Originally Posted by recceguy
When US (or NATO which is the same) hits an hospital it's a mistake or a collateral damage.
When it's the other side it's a war crime.

This time over Syria the farce of no-fly zones as they were implemented over Bosnia or Irak will not happen, thanks to Su-35 and S-400.
I understand a truce has to be enforced, as for the moment the US-backed islamist insurgents (the so-called "moderate" ones) are clearly losing ground.

When instead of Aleppo it was Dresden or Hamburg or even Le Havre, the world media was not so present.
SASless is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2016, 10:45
  #1825 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Clipperton island
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As much confused as the US are about which people they do support ?

Al-Nosra (supported by US) = Al Qaïda..... and Al Qaïda was 9/11, that's as simple as that.

Ref: (and a couple of other magazines and newspaper extracts, easy to find)

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/w...cle4545775.ece

Now explain to me.
recceguy is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2016, 08:15
  #1826 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I'd read that from an anonymous ppruner I might have assumed him to be a Putinbot but General Petraus really is insisting we MUST support Al Qaeda against ISIS. That's the thing about speaking in imperatives; it doesn't have to make sense. Assad would probably have dealt with ISIS quite comfortably without our intervention...as would Saddam, come to that...
ShotOne is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2016, 08:44
  #1827 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 120
Received 22 Likes on 11 Posts
To throw into the mix

Russia Kills 30 US, Israeli, British Officers Believed To Be Assisting ISIS – Anonymous
DroneDog is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2016, 11:45
  #1828 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,754
Received 2,738 Likes on 1,166 Posts
Al-Qaeda Leader in Syria Admits US Is Backing Them in Interview – Anonymous

NutLoose is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2016, 12:39
  #1829 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is a propaganda hit piece generated by Sputnik (Russian News Agency).
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2016, 12:46
  #1830 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,283
Received 498 Likes on 207 Posts
How's that Obama Foreign Policy working out for all of you that raved about his being elected eight years ago?

I don't see all those cheering crowds of admirers anymore....what happened?

Did his Secretary of State choices give him bad guidance for the past eight years?
SASless is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2016, 19:33
  #1831 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not scotland
Posts: 359
Received 60 Likes on 28 Posts
How's that Obama Foreign Policy working out for all of you that raved about his being elected eight years ago?

I don't see all those cheering crowds of admirers anymore....what happened?

Did his Secretary of State choices give him bad guidance for the past eight years?
We are out of Helmand and I haven't seen flag draped coffins coming off the tails of C17s at Brize for quite some time. I will take that thanks very much.

Any chance your political rants could be kept in Jet blast?

Back to Syria.

Given the worsening of relations with Russia, they seem to have beefed up their air defence capability in Syria.

http://www.militarytimes.com/article...siles-in-syria

Last edited by Toadstool; 4th Oct 2016 at 19:56.
Toadstool is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2016, 23:24
  #1832 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Clipperton island
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Toadstool
Any chance your political rants could be kept in Jet blast?
So you don't like what you read ... sorry mate, it's a forum, and you have to realize that many people have different opinions than yours, and are not really on the US side (should we ?) when they do support al Qaida and affiliates.

I understand it's can be quite destabilising for you to acknowledge that some of us might be current wide-bodies Captains and/or former Groupe Captains/Colonels
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
T50_3.jpg (192.0 KB, 23 views)

Last edited by recceguy; 5th Oct 2016 at 00:02.
recceguy is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2016, 16:38
  #1833 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: not scotland
Posts: 359
Received 60 Likes on 28 Posts
I understand it's can be quite destabilising for you to acknowledge that some of us might be current wide-bodies Captains and/or former Groupe Captains/Colonels
Not at all recce. I understand it can be quite destabilising for you to acknowledge that those of us who are not captains/colonels/group captains have opinions
Toadstool is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2016, 18:39
  #1834 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and that said Captains/Colonels and Group Captains can be quite wrong too....

To think otherwise is [probably] the very definition of arrogance.
MSOCS is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2016, 13:52
  #1835 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,356
Received 1,565 Likes on 712 Posts
Interesting connection of the dots.....

Last week Erdogan questioned the Treaty of Lausanne of the status of the Greek islands off the Turkish coast. Which seemed strange, as he is unlikely to try to go to war over them.

Greece Defense Official: Contest Treaty, Contest EU Borders

The article below, however, suggests he had a more oblique reason for questioning the treaty......

The questioning of the treaty of Lausanne and backstage with the Iraqi oil | Independent Balkan News Agency

"Tension has risen between Baghdad and Ankara on the presence of Turkish troops in northern Iraq. But almost all political analysts agree that the goal of Turkey is to participate in the liberation of Mosul from the hands of the jihadists -an operation which perhaps is going to take place in November.

Ankara seems to be targeting the oil fields of the region. More likely there is a connection to this claims and the questioning of the Lausanne Treaty by Recep Tayyip Erdogan ten days ago. With the Lausanne Treaty Turkey withdrew its claims on Mosul and Kirkuk and conceded that area to the British administration in 1926.

The Iraqi Parliament on Tuesday called on Turkey to withdraw its military force from the northern Iraqi city of Bashika. About 500 Turkish soldiers are located there since March 2015, whose purpose according to the Ankara is to train the men who will take part in the fighting against the Islamic State. Bashika is just 12 km from Mosul. The Iraqi Parliament called these Turkish forces as “occupying forces”. Ankara’s response was contemptuous, with the representative of the Turkish government Numan Kurtulmuş stating: “they speak of national sovereignty but where were they when others took over Mosul”?

The Turkish president however, in a television interview had revealed the intentions of Turkey when he said that “nobody has the right to invade Mosul. After the liberation of Mosul from the “Islamic State” only Sunni Arabs, Turkmen and Sunni Kurds should stay there”. Essentially, the Turkish president showed that Turkey wants the region to be controlled by Sunni Muslims, ignoring the intentions of the Shiites, who are the majority in Iraq and Iran.........

“If there is a country that is entitled to speak of Mosul, apart from Iraq, is Turkey. The Turkmen in the region were never protected by Baghdad. Until 1987 the Turkish budget documents the rights that should be collected by the oil of the region. Our forces in Bashika are following the demand of the northern Iraqi Kurds. Turkey has a greater right than even the US to participate in the battles of Mosul and then be on the negotiations table”, says Fikret Bila in Hürriyet, explaining the views of the Turkish Government..............."
ORAC is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2016, 10:55
  #1836 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,231
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
In yesterday's parliamentary debate on Syria, it was asked where the Stop the War Coalition was.

Today on R4 this morning asked the very same question of one of the organisation's higher-ups. I would say his reply smacks of breathtaking hypocrisy but, then again, he probably doesn't want to bite the hand that feeds.

BBC Radio 4 - Today, 12/10/2016

Jump to 53:30.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2016, 12:28
  #1837 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A heavy portion of hypocricy resides with mass media, which manipulate the audience.


E.g., in Syria both sides heavily shoot at other: Assad troops and "rebels" (majority of which are teamed up with Nusra/Al-Qaeda and Daesh/ISIS). Western media hysterically reports casualties caused by the former side and keeps silence about the latter. Similarly, Russian and some arabic media show similar footage on how "rebel" (read, "terrorist") mortars are destrying Aleppo living quarters that are under governmental control also killing innocent women and children.
A_Van is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2016, 17:07
  #1838 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,179
Received 377 Likes on 231 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
Interesting connection of the dots.....


The questioning of the treaty of Lausanne and backstage with the Iraqi oil | Independent Balkan News Agency
{snip}
The Turkish president however, in a television interview had revealed the intentions of Turkey when he said that “nobody has the right to invade Mosul. After the liberation of Mosul from the “Islamic State” only Sunni Arabs, Turkmen and Sunni Kurds should stay there”. Essentially, the Turkish president showed that Turkey wants the region to be controlled by Sunni Muslims, ignoring the intentions of the Shiites, who are the majority in Iraq and Iran.........

“If there is a country that is entitled to speak of Mosul, apart from Iraq, is Turkey. The Turkmen in the region were never protected by Baghdad. Until 1987 the Turkish budget documents the rights that should be collected by the oil of the region. Our forces in Bashika are following the demand of the northern Iraqi Kurds. Turkey has a greater right than even the US to participate in the battles of Mosul and then be on the negotiations table”, says Fikret Bila in Hürriyet, explaining the views of the Turkish Government..............."
ORAC, that's a great summary of the Turks showing a bit of their hand in the long game they've been playing. No surprise.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2016, 22:54
  #1839 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,754
Received 2,738 Likes on 1,166 Posts
Meanwhile I see the Beeb are saying the Iraqis are on the verge of re-capturing Mosul... surely that is re-taking as it was theirs to start with?
NutLoose is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2016, 06:00
  #1840 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,356
Received 1,565 Likes on 712 Posts
Depends if you consider it historically/politically/religiously as a Shia/Sunni/Kurd/Turkoman city........

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-in-five-maps/
ORAC is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.