Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

617 Sqn Special Unveiling news

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

617 Sqn Special Unveiling news

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Mar 2013, 10:48
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Without doubt the original members of 617 Sqdn carried out a courageous and expert piece of flying. I wonder what they would think seeing current members basking in their glory?
I speak as one who served on 617 when it re-formed with Vulcans. During a detachment to the USA we were publicly hailed as the 'Dambuster Boys'. It was most embarrassing."

Goudie

If it is that embarrassing, then why
- does 617 Squadron have a burst dam in the middle of the Squadron Crest ?
- does the current Tornado as pictured have a Dambuster Lancaster
an even bigger burst dam and the actual word "Dambuster" on the tail ?
- does the 617 Aircrew Association have Dambusters70 logo on the front page ?

Last edited by 500N; 21st Mar 2013 at 11:21.
500N is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 11:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You miss the point 500N. Nothing embarrassing about the logo. It depicts a historical moment in the Squadron's history
.I was proud to serve on 617. Following in their footsteps is one thing
The embarrassment was being hailed with a title, for which we were not worthy.
goudie is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 12:02
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Well done 617 Sqn.

As a matter of interest the US Navy had ships named after victories over the British i.e. USS Valley Forge and I don't see those self-righeous types manning the battlements. Meanwhile don't forget Trafalgar Day, Taranto and the Spanish Armada!
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 12:26
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ticonderoga (2), Bunker Hill (2), Lexington (2), Saratoga (2), Cowpens (2), and many others.

All of which served beside RN ships... sometimes in the same formation.

You take pride in the achievements of your predecessors, and acknowledge the bravery and achievements of your enemies-turned-allies.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 13:07
  #25 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Personally I find it easy to rationalise military honours in battle, and the bravery of individual combatants, but here we glory an attack on a series of targets that had severe or potentially severe effects on 'civilians' - So I still think that glorifying such an event from the other side would be greeted with outrage from most in this country.
AR1 is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 19:03
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Another pic ...



To mark 70 years since the formation of the Dambusters presenter Dan Snow unveiled new tail art on an RAF Tornado GR4, the aircraft flown by 617 Sqn today.

Image shows: TV Presenter Dan Snow returning from a flight in a 617 Sqn RAF Tornado.
Why Snow
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 20:15
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Late in the piece - Special, 617?

Last edited by cuefaye; 21st Mar 2013 at 20:16.
cuefaye is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 21:18
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
Rather surprised to see a chap of Dan Snow's stature in a GR4, I'd have thought he was a might too big anthropometrically.

Have to say though that he looks a great deal more like a 'fighter pilot' than the other chap next to him! (or indeed most RAF aircrew).
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 21:20
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
He also looks a tad green ... not just the flight suit
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2013, 07:49
  #30 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
The picture shows the reality of being a fighter pilot. - On the left the big strapping pilot of TV and film, just buckle the jet on his back and he's ready for business. .... On the right, the real thing. An ordinary man laden down with charts, books and checklists.
AR1 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2013, 12:02
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Personally I find it easy to rationalise military honours in battle, and the bravery of individual combatants, but here we glory an attack on a series of targets that had severe or potentially severe effects on 'civilians' - So I still think that glorifying such an event from the other side would be greeted with outrage from most in this country.
Revisionist history - are you David Irving by any chance?

It was total war - the civilians killed by 617 were acceptable collateral damage. We don't glorify the area bombing of Dresden - that is a different argument. We wouldn't expect the Luftwaffe today to glorify their raids on London and Coventry either.
Training Risky is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2013, 13:39
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the amazing thing about the Tornado's paint scheme is that it has somehow made the fin look even bigger - or have they upgraded to a larger one to make the world's biggest RCS even more significant?
orca is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2013, 15:00
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Midlands
Posts: 745
Received 25 Likes on 8 Posts
Nice, wonder if they asked him not to tuck his turning trousers into his boots..

Tail looks nice, I'm sure the UK's last surviving Dams raid veteran would approve.

Last edited by Stitchbitch; 22nd Mar 2013 at 22:53.
Stitchbitch is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2013, 15:02
  #34 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Revisionist history - are you David Irving by any chance?
Absolutely not!

The Dams raid, was seen as necessary and it's reasoning accepted at the time by those who sanctioned the effort. That included the full impact of hitting that target - as apart from the effect on industrial production, the immediate collateral damage would be overwhelmingly civilian. Non of the targets were in fact military, and that in my view places the raid alongside those of the area bombing campaign, and as you point out - we don't celebrate that.

Which leads me to my thoughts in the original post.
AR1 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2013, 15:14
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,156
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by AR1
Non of the targets were in fact military, and that in my view places the raid alongside those of the area bombing campaign.....
That's an interesting way of viewing the event.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2013, 21:12
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 260
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You seem to be
phil9560 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2013, 22:08
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,075
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Non of the targets were in fact military
mmm...but you have admitted that the targets had an industrial function. That places them on the list 'contributing to the German war effort' - therefore 'legal' in a war fought in 1943. The only reasons that dams and electric power production are on a no-strike list in 2013 are lack of political will caused by an ever-changing Western moral zeitgeist. If our backs are ever up against the wall in a future global war, would you really call the RAF Air Staff war criminals as they bomb the cr@p out of a dam/oil refinery/UNESCO site?? As I wrote earlier, illegality in war is very difficult to 'prove' as what world court is there to hear the charge and provide due process for the accused?

The targets of the area bombing campaigns were civilian population and logistical nodes and were a different target set to the dams. They were attacked for strategic reasons and Bomber Harris did get Churchill worried that he himself might face an international war-crimes court after the war...but hey ho we won!
Training Risky is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2013, 15:17
  #38 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Wrath, how about the Bader Wing?

Originally Posted by Training Risky
The only reasons that dams and electric power production are on a no-strike list in 2013 are lack of political will caused by an ever-changing Western moral zeitgeist.
Power production was on the target sets in both Bosnia and Iraq. As our present conflict is in a friendly country it follows that infrastructure is not a desirable target set.

I would agree that a dam would probably be off limits if it meant an innocent civilian population would die of thirst.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2013, 15:24
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,156
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Dams are on the prohibited target list in the Geneva Convention, signed in 1948.
just another jocky is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2013, 06:44
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Somewhere sandy with an enormous bloomin' tower
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Point of Order

Have to say though that he looks a great deal more like a 'fighter pilot' than the other chap next to him! (or indeed most RAF aircrew).
However unimpressive any of us now or ever looked like, the correct term is 'Bomber pilot' not 'Fighter pilot'.

......making history, not movies, or some such.
BigX is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.