Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

More from Commander Ward

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

More from Commander Ward

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Mar 2013, 16:39
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tried to read this but gave up after a few pages... To say it is a wee bit basis is an under statement, plus there are a few errors to say the least in his arguements.

He appears to igore the design faults in the new carriers, which have not included a basic design requirement for cat/trap operations to allow other aircraft types to operate from the deck, but I suspect he will blame the RAF or someone who is not from RN service.

I will get my coat... before we open up that can of worms.

Happy landing
zero1 is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 16:40
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: the earth
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The first time I heard "Jointery" put forward as the way to go was in 1960, when I was a Grammar School Army Cadet. In 1963 I joined the RAF and in all my service as a Maritime Pilot, I found that the Army were very keen on Jointery, but the RN considered themselves to be the Senior Service and the rest of Her Majesty's Services to be somewhat below them.

What were they smokin' at Dartmouth?


Neptune,

Are you not playing up to the very criticism that you level at Sharky? Ocra very correctly points out that those of us who work at the coal face are commited to making this work. A few years ago I remember one Army Officer describing the RAF as 'Utterly, utterly useless'. The views of the entire Army? Or one slightly hacked off officer. They exist in all 3 services. Dont join their ranks by tarring us all with the same brush.

Last edited by AutoBit; 12th Mar 2013 at 16:43.
AutoBit is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 17:39
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was he rejected by the ATC as a boy?
XV277 is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 18:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,880
Received 2,823 Likes on 1,203 Posts
White beard and hair, always ranting and raving about the Navy and the war....

Hmmmmmm where have I seen that before?




.

Last edited by NutLoose; 12th Mar 2013 at 18:46.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 19:05
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
A strange thing, Nutty. I just knew you were about to come up with something outstanding!
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 19:08
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
I dislike knocking people, particularly someone who has done a job I could never have done, and who has served with distinction in a difficult war.
BUT, the problem here is that Sharkey Ward is to many people the public face of the RN past - its no wonder the RN has a bit of an image problem at times when people keep on bleating about the evil RAF conspiracy and so on. Its very dull, very boring and about as accurate as RAF bombing in WW2

But seriously though, I'm left with the very strong impression that he is no longer taken seriously in Whitehall (the rumour whispered to me was he is now PNG and his long rambling missives no longer get replied to) and that he is now one of those sad individuals dreaming of a brighter past, who is now doing serious damage to the future credibility of the Service he professes to love.
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 19:11
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
It has to be said that Ward sets his sights on some pretty easy targets. The bit about the Air Staff lying for example. He mentions a particularity odious former CAS who liked writing to the press about the MoK pilots being guilty as sin, so Ward can't be all bad.

But he opens himself up to ridicule so often the good comments lose impact.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 19:18
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nutty ... Only you could find some way in a Sharkey Ward thread to have a dig at Buster !

Commander Ward needs to keep his Fish Fingers out


Last edited by CoffmanStarter; 12th Mar 2013 at 19:26.
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 19:25
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Come to think of it Commander Ward must know of the PPRuNe Mil Forum ... and I'll bet he lurkes' here often ... strange that he doesn't want to engage though
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 19:57
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 71
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Probably spends most of his life in his bunk "tossing" himself off his deck launch, time and time again!!!!
smujsmith is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 19:59
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have read his article and, while there are a fair number of factually dubious statements in it, I find a lot of common sense and sound logic too. In other words, he talks some sense.
Unfortunately he is now such a figure of hate to most of the junior service that if he stated the earth was round he would be rubbished.
What is beyond dispute is this. We are a maritime nation with significant interests to support and protect all around the world. For the Chiefs of Staff in the MoD to have allowed our politicians to abandon our LRMPA and attack aircraft carrier capabilities is outrageous, unbelievable, unforgiveable, criminal.

Last edited by Genstabler; 12th Mar 2013 at 20:01.
Genstabler is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 20:32
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: york
Posts: 35
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep it in perspective

Chaps,

Whatever you think of Sharkeys ramblings. I had the great pleasure of helping him to convert to Vstol on 233.

A) He was an extremely capable pilot/operator/leader.

B) He was a breath of fresh air to the RAF even if they didn't listen. An aircraft is not the 'be all and end all' to the RN hence a Sqn Cdr has a lot more ability to apply common sense rules than his light blue equivalent.

C) He was Mr. Sea Harrier in the early 80's

D) He let me fly one of his Jets at Yeovilton with only a short brief from 'Bertie'

E) He offered me a job which thank god I declined!

He may rustle a few feathers but so did Montgomery etc. As he showed down South, Sharky is the sort of guy who shines when the chips are down.

Just had to put the record straight.

Lifts a gift
thrusts a must is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 21:15
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Then what a shame he's turned into the bitter old man that he makes himself appear today.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 21:29
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
Nah, that's not his blog...

...this is!

Beards and Bull****

Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2013, 01:44
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Courtney,

If I may correct the words of my statement to align more closely with the spirit in which it was intended...

The natural predators of Jointery appear to only lurk within/ be subsets of the senior or retired officer cadres.

I don't doubt (have first hand experience of) your own Joint credentials as well as those of many others amongst those senior, retired, deranged and err...deceased.

You know what I meant!
orca is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2013, 06:38
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Only slightly deranged, please.

Understood.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2013, 09:00
  #37 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,392
Received 1,585 Likes on 722 Posts
We are a maritime nation with significant interests to support and protect all around the world.
I'd argue both those statements are incorrect and have been for at least 30-40 years if not longer.

Withdrawal from east of Suez was an act of realism, not sabotage.
ORAC is online now  
Old 13th Mar 2013, 09:31
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We withdrew our military bases from east of Suez. That may indeed have been an act of political realism. However, our national interests remain in the shape of alliances, commerce etc. and we still have significant territorial possessions dotted around the globe, separated from us by sea.
So which of the statements are incorrect?
Genstabler is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2013, 09:40
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not...

Just give up disband the RAF and let the RN run everything with wings and rotors...

I am sure it would be much much better...

His comments are galling to me because the carrier deal stinks and I loath the MOD, Gordon Brown and the RN for foisting this on the UK...
Bigpants is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2013, 09:43
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 527
Received 170 Likes on 91 Posts
Care to elaborate?

the carrier deal stinks and I loath the MOD, Gordon Brown and the RN for foisting this on the UK...
Not_a_boffin is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.