Oops, missed again !
Thread Starter
Oops, missed again !
I always believed that the 'Shiny Fleet' never bent a 10. I came across this from an old friend who now resides in Australia.
Taken in Belize circa 1982, anyone have any knowledge of how it happened?
Taken in Belize circa 1982, anyone have any knowledge of how it happened?
Thread Starter
According to my Aussie Pal, that was the movements officer "insisting" (looks more like mincing to me), that no one was allowed to take photographs. Mission accomplished then Mr Mover !!!
Last edited by smujsmith; 9th Feb 2013 at 22:34.
There is reference on another thread, somewhere on here, to 'The Central American Ploughing Incident', involving a VC10. This may be photographic evidence of it?
As I recall, the thread also noted that there were a couple of incidents or near-incidents with the VC10 at Belize related to the fact that the runway there was a little narrower than the turning circle of the VC10...
As I recall, the thread also noted that there were a couple of incidents or near-incidents with the VC10 at Belize related to the fact that the runway there was a little narrower than the turning circle of the VC10...
Thread Starter
I doubt it ' sweetie ' I reckon at best he's a Flying Officer with twisted knickers. Looks like his handler (behind) has been trained to pose in a similar style 
I hear he went on in later life and had a career in Television.
Last edited by SASless; 10th Feb 2013 at 02:46.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@ smujsmith
Awesome photo mate and it shows just how the RAF [used to] operate...
1. I'm in charge. Of a hat, stable belt and rolled up sox....yes.
2. I'm in charge two, who without hat, stable belt and having muddy knees, actually probably is, and has just realised that "it won't just polish out".
And is looking for the driver.
3. Group around nose wheel in various garb. Probably the ones who were actually GTFO and are desperately devising a scheme to be on their way without losing their "slot".
A forlorn hope.
4. People in junglies who give the appearance of actually GTFO ASAP. The smart ones.
5. Guy pretending to eyeball the shooter but is only waiting for 1. to turn his back before joining 4.
1. I'm in charge. Of a hat, stable belt and rolled up sox....yes.
2. I'm in charge two, who without hat, stable belt and having muddy knees, actually probably is, and has just realised that "it won't just polish out".
And is looking for the driver.
3. Group around nose wheel in various garb. Probably the ones who were actually GTFO and are desperately devising a scheme to be on their way without losing their "slot".
A forlorn hope.
4. People in junglies who give the appearance of actually GTFO ASAP. The smart ones.
5. Guy pretending to eyeball the shooter but is only waiting for 1. to turn his back before joining 4.
Blimey ! Was that refuelling ?
Smudge
Smudge
The whole incident was made a little more exciting because there were some folk in the cargo/baggage bay at the time (you can see the partially open sliding door of that compartment just behind and below the RAF roundel). The door to that compartment slides inwards and forwards when open, so as soon as the aircraft sat up to 'beg', the door slid rearwards and then closed itself!
The OP asked if Shiney 10 had ever bent a VC10. I suspect that 810 in the photo at Belize wasn't bent as Vickers used to build ships, tanks, submarines and aircraft all to the same standard. All it would have required is pulling out of the mud and a bit of a wash.
808 sitting on it's tail did happen as Stuart Sutcliffe described - the fuel guage was U/S and written up as such. The defuel team missed it. The aircraft was a write off as it damaged the rear pressure bulkhead and it was deemed beyond repair. But it was base hangar who did this and therefore techncally not by 10 Sqn.
A C1 did get it's belly skin wrinkled in a heavy landing during a pilot conversion in about 1998.
808 sitting on it's tail did happen as Stuart Sutcliffe described - the fuel guage was U/S and written up as such. The defuel team missed it. The aircraft was a write off as it damaged the rear pressure bulkhead and it was deemed beyond repair. But it was base hangar who did this and therefore techncally not by 10 Sqn.
A C1 did get it's belly skin wrinkled in a heavy landing during a pilot conversion in about 1998.
Last edited by Dan Winterland; 10th Feb 2013 at 03:24. Reason: spilling
The aircraft written off by the ground engineers during post-fuel mapping defuel was XR806....
XR808, aka 'Bob', is planned to be retired from service in the summer of 2013.
Perhaps Voyager might have actually an AAR clearance by then.....
XR808, aka 'Bob', is planned to be retired from service in the summer of 2013.
Perhaps Voyager might have actually an AAR clearance by then.....
Thanks Beagle, I thought it was my eyesight that was at fault - turns out it was ok. 606 lives on in the form of a Corgi diecast model :
It's one of their "fighting machines" series!
Edited to apologise for advertising both small dog toys and big river mail order!
It's one of their "fighting machines" series!
Edited to apologise for advertising both small dog toys and big river mail order!
Last edited by Tankertrashnav; 10th Feb 2013 at 08:38.
Thread Starter
Thanks for the replies chaps, I always thought that the 10 was a great aircraft. And also understood it to be well built. I was quite surprised to see it off the runway but my Aussie source who is ex RAF couldn't tell me how it ended up where it did. Despite taking the photograph. In my opinion I doubt if anyone will ever build a better looking aircraft than the VC10 it must have been a joy to fly.
Smudge
Smudge
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,891
Received 2,829 Likes
on
1,207 Posts
Is the guy at the top awaiting the rest of the village people to show up?
Anyone remember the bog truck through the pressure hull at Newcasle, flown back below 10 thou, same guy, same place, same truck, different aircraft one week later, same result
Anyone remember the bog truck through the pressure hull at Newcasle, flown back below 10 thou, same guy, same place, same truck, different aircraft one week later, same result