Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Red Arrows for the Chop?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Red Arrows for the Chop?

Old 8th Feb 2013, 11:41
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
" an obsolete single engine trainer"

USN- The T-45 is to be in service until 2035 or later.

and coming from a country that still is dependent on the T-38 Talon (first flight over 50 years ago) to train its Air ForceI think that's a bit much TBH
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 11:52
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
Harry....you know exactly what I was saying.

Your Reds fly old kit, a trainer, and do not fly frontline FJ aircraft.

They are darned good, put on a good show but their aircraft just are not that impressive anymore.

The aircraft they fly gets the job done, usually any way....but they are not Golly Gee Whiz rides they have.

Put them in that new thingy you have over there....Typhoon is it....now that would change the whole ballgame!

Last edited by SASless; 8th Feb 2013 at 11:53.
SASless is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 11:55
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Yes, I don't think anyone could argue against the extra wow factor the Blue Angels have because of their aircraft. And their crazily tight formation, of course.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 12:52
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts


Last edited by SASless; 8th Feb 2013 at 12:54.
SASless is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 15:26
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SASless a question ...

I know displays are performed at Low Level but why no full Ox Mask kit ? ... OK boom mics are more comfortable but if you fly FJ's the standard rig should be worn ?

Cheers

Coff
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 15:59
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 119K East of SARDOT
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SASless,

I remember seeing the Red Arrows in Cyprus (1972) doing their work up (final) display and I thought "Not bad." Then a Lightning came onto the scene, smashed the place up; at the end of his display - with 8/8s Blue - the guy flew his jet halfway along the display line and then went vertical - simply disappeared - and I thought "Wow."

Good point, well made.

S4G
Sand4Gold is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 16:42
  #87 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why no full Ox Mask kit ?
- ah, but then you would not see their faces............................
BOAC is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 16:46
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Coff, I can only imagine it's to let the camera see the pilot's face. Or so that the adoring crowds can see the pilot's steely smile during taxy.

Obviously no need for O2 at low level, but stupid not to have the O2 mask in the event of fire, fumes, ejection (part of helmet stability). Presumably they would have to put the masks on for transits - who knows what altitude you'd need for various reasons. Also the mask helps cut out cockpit noise when using RT and offers some (not much) protection against injury from birdstrike.

Seems pretty silly to me.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 17:09
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks Courtney ... agreed ... wear the right kit for the job
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 18:56
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Threshold 06
Posts: 576
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
I first saw `Bin the Reds` as a serious cost saving suggestion in `85 when I started my first Eng Authority job...I guess its been going ever since in the annual staff blood letting exercise..

However - this time I have the answer! Try this lot on contract!



gliderFX - Home - Aerobatic displays in the world's most exciting aerobatic gliders
oldmansquipper is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 19:16
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
I cannot answer the question re Mask/No Mask but I would assume they go without during displays as O2 is not required, reduces the head weight during their High G maneuvers, allows for easier head movement with greater range of motion. Listening to the intercom conversation in the two seat aircraft shows the boom mikes work just fine with the noise level.

The Navy has a tradition of using both mask and boom mike setups in their Operational flying perhaps that is a carry over from the old days.

Court....your opinion is noted however I would have to assume the USN Aviation Safety folks studied the issue and decided it was the better way to go for the Team. As they are Professionals in this kind of business I would think you would grant them some respect.....or is that reserved for the Reds only?

I am sure when they transit between shows and get to normal cruise heights they wear the standard gear.

Looking at Thunderbirds stuff....it appears they wear the Mask.

Last edited by SASless; 8th Feb 2013 at 19:23.
SASless is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 19:45
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,779
Received 75 Likes on 34 Posts
The no-mask thing is to allow full-face camera shots. Masks don't impinge on communications in any way, in fact they reduce the ambient noise into the mike. I think the Blue Angels 'no mask' thing is one of these classic bits of commander's risk analysis:

Option 1 - Keep the boom mic. During my 2- or 3-year period of responsibility, there is a small (perhaps less than 1%) chance that a serious incident will result in me being charged with negligence, for perpetuating an obviously risky PR benefit at the expense of safety.

Option 2 - Mandate the mask. Approximately a 100% chance of attracting disapproval from old + bold admirals (who aren't themselves in the airworthiness chain, but definitely have a say in my career). I don't really want to be known as a stickler for health and safety, do I?

Less than 1% chance of being caught out? 100% chance of attracting criticism from above? No-brainer. Risk tolerated!

Last edited by Easy Street; 8th Feb 2013 at 19:46.
Easy Street is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 21:03
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I for one very much enjoyed seeing my tax dollars at work today practicing over Scampton. Really brightened up a long journey home. And despite my shaky phone camerawork, my four-year-old lad thought it was brilliant too. I hope some of the air+ground team frequent this forum - thanks, guys/gals.

PGFlight is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 22:22
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
The no-mask thing is to allow full-face camera shots.
The source for your definite statement of that being the reason is?

You have some official reference that confirms that or are you just offering a personal opinion based on mere supposition?
SASless is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2013, 22:57
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,779
Received 75 Likes on 34 Posts
I don't have an official source. It is a supposition, albeit one based on years of fast-jet flying.

If you can offer any official evidence that there is any reason other than PR for the Blue Angels to dispense with the oxygen masks worn as standard by fast-jet crews the world over, whether on display or on normal duties, then I will gladly retract my previous post. Until such time, I stand entirely by my comments, which I reckon to be based on firmer ground than any of these personal opinions based on mere supposition:

reduces the head weight during their High G maneuvers
Oxygen masks weigh practically nothing and don't stick out as far as a boom mike.
allows for easier head movement with greater range of motion
If the mask hose is the right length then the helmet touching the collar of the lifejacket is the most limiting factor on range of movement.
O2 is not required
Becomes a questionable assumption as soon as smoke or fumes are encountered.

I don't need to produce a reference to suggest that the flying kit designed for use in the F/A-18, an aircraft easily capable of 7g and a renowned close-in dogfighter, might be designed specifically with freedom of head movement in mind.

Last edited by Easy Street; 8th Feb 2013 at 23:10.
Easy Street is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2013, 01:10
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
So an impasse....you pose an opinion but not based upon any knowledge of the Blue's basis for doing what they do. Sounds fine to me.

I certainly don't know but clearly stated that my comment was just a guess.

Small but definite difference don't you think.
SASless is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2013, 11:59
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TBH an AIR DISPLAY is not about carting some super jet around the scenery at max speed and noise - it is about precision flying

I always felt that the Lightning was dreadful display aircraft - it made a lot of noise but it disappeared from sight for well over half the time - compared to the Hunter it was grim to watch. The Hawk is a pretty good aeroplane for display flying - you can always roll out the heavy iron for a few passes (or very slow ones if you are Russian) to show what you've got but for a display give me something that can turn inside a 4km circle
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2013, 12:15
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,267
Received 467 Likes on 191 Posts
Like the F-16 perhaps....or the F-22 or the F-35, Harrier, Typhoon, A-10, perhaps the Tornado?

Air Shows are not just some airplanes flying close together....one small for instance.... the Spitfire, Lancaster, Hurricane, B-29, B-17, B-24, Corsair, Mustang.

When the Huey and Chinook show up...it is a complete Show!




Last edited by SASless; 9th Feb 2013 at 12:43.
SASless is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2013, 12:22
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: -
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had the pleasure of watching the Blue Angels do their thing recently at their winter training ground. They were very impressive and always made the effort to wave whilst taxiing past. They also came to visit my unit, in preparation for a display, a couple of months ago and the crew came wearing boom mikes for the transit.

There can be no reason other than aesthetics for not wearing a mask. This is just a case of risk analysis (or not) resulting in a course of action. There is no reason why a mask could not be worn for this stuff and not wearing one brings risk both for ejection (low probability) and smoke and fumes (low probability). Imho suggesting that it's for range of motion or weight is (imho) misguided. We do defensive BFM with masks and JHMCS very often which requires greater range of motion; max available G; and greater weight on the old head. It's no big deal.
dash2 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2013, 12:39
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Recentish film on the Blue Angels showed how totally focused on "show" they are. Looks are everything, they don't wear g-suits to spoil the cut of their uniforms.
Good luck to them, couldn't face that environment myself, let alone cut the mustard.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.