Sentinel Deployed to Mali
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: S of 55N
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could be looked at as mission creep but, like the C-17s, it seems more of a case of allowing the French to make use of a capability they do not currently possess.
Not that we will possess it ourselves after 2015 under the current plans.
Not that we will possess it ourselves after 2015 under the current plans.
Last edited by Martin the Martian; 25th Jan 2013 at 18:11.
was my understanding sentinel has a reprieve post 15?
If sentinel is to be maintained post 2015 (and I'm neither arguing for or against that), then presumably something else has to go/give to release the funding to pay for it - or are there still some people out there who still think that more money will be available by 2015? 
In the meantime, and I'm not asking for any details, what is the footprint to support the sentinel deployment, admin, supply, engineering, force protection, etc, etc......?
In the meantime, and I'm not asking for any details, what is the footprint to support the sentinel deployment, admin, supply, engineering, force protection, etc, etc......?
Last edited by Biggus; 25th Jan 2013 at 20:36.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Think the extension idea comes from government offering them up to Nato in February last year.
@Biggus - the comments about a visiting aircraft at Waddington over on Fighter Control may give a few clues. c17 25/01/13 • FighterControl • Military Aviation Forum
@Biggus - the comments about a visiting aircraft at Waddington over on Fighter Control may give a few clues. c17 25/01/13 • FighterControl • Military Aviation Forum
Last edited by bit-twiddler; 25th Jan 2013 at 20:42.
In theory there is an unallocated pot of several £bn to pay for priorities yet to be decided. So in theory again it would be a matter of Sentinel making it onto what I understand MoD calls its "whiteboard" of items it wants to pay for in that way. Of course things may not pan out like that, but the unallocated contingency is part of what appears to be an understanding established between MoD and Treasury as part of MoD putting in place better financial management. Whether the pot survives at all will be a good litmus test of whether a department can deal with the Treasury in good faith. I'm not betting the farm on that, but we'll find out soon enough.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: S of 55N
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Future ISTAR
The activity looking at the UK's future ISTAR (more properly ISR) constellation is the Air ISTAR Optimisation Study (passing reference here): House of Commons - Future Maritime Surveillance: Government Response to the Committee's Fifth Report of Session 2012-13 - Defence Committee
It's sponsored by D (JACT) and is a two stage process ultimately reporting April 2014.
Sun
It's sponsored by D (JACT) and is a two stage process ultimately reporting April 2014.
Sun
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lindum
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
howiehowie93 hints at the right of it. This is surely yet another damning indictment of the SDSR decision to dispense with the RN's carrier capability. Safe flying to the Sentinal guys though
We are talking about the Mali that is famously landlocked aren't we?
Sending a carrier verses a few dozen people to run a Sentinel and a couple of C-17s?
Why does ever thread drift into the topic of a floating runway?
Sending a carrier verses a few dozen people to run a Sentinel and a couple of C-17s?
Why does ever thread drift into the topic of a floating runway?
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
This is surely yet another damning indictment of the SDSR decision to dispense with the RN's carrier capability.
From the coast of Guinea to the east of Mali is about 1200nm.
To put that into perspective if the carrier was left in its UK port the northern tip of Mali would be about 1600nm from the deck.
The RN spiel about how much of the planet is covered in the watery stuff is pretty weak. The last time I checked 100% of the plant is still covered by air.
To put that into perspective if the carrier was left in its UK port the northern tip of Mali would be about 1600nm from the deck.
The RN spiel about how much of the planet is covered in the watery stuff is pretty weak. The last time I checked 100% of the plant is still covered by air.
For those who think that a little carrier with a handful of puffer jets and a few clattering things would be of much use in this particular conflict, this is a map of the area:
(from bing maps)
'Miles' shown on the ruler are statute miles, not nautical miles.
(from bing maps)
'Miles' shown on the ruler are statute miles, not nautical miles.
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: FR
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Illustrations of the above:
France didn't send its (only) carrier. OK, it's under (light) maintenance, but this is not rushed to make the ship available either (as it was for Libya).
France did send a BPC (Dixmude) (a very able helicopter platform), but... without helicopter onboard, just as a heavy capacity carrier (armored vehicules, numerous trucks and so on).
I too suppose there is a reason to do so.
France didn't send its (only) carrier. OK, it's under (light) maintenance, but this is not rushed to make the ship available either (as it was for Libya).
France did send a BPC (Dixmude) (a very able helicopter platform), but... without helicopter onboard, just as a heavy capacity carrier (armored vehicules, numerous trucks and so on).
I too suppose there is a reason to do so.