Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Bomber Command members forced to pay for memorial

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Bomber Command members forced to pay for memorial

Old 30th Aug 2012, 20:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: EU
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bomber Command members forced to pay for memorial

A memorial was recently set up in London to recognise the heroic acts of the members of Bomber Command - finally. Now it's been built the war heros are being forced to pay for the maintenance of the whole thing.

They never had any sort of memorial, so 4 members campaigned for one to be set up. Nobody ever told them that those 4 individuals have to pay for the maintenance costs. The up keep will cost £500,000, that's £150,000 each. These elderly heroes only have 1 year to come up with the money.

They can't get out of it, their only hope is that somebody sponsors them.

Disgusting or what?
pudoc is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 20:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal
Age: 92
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down Monument to WW2 Bomber Command

They were good enough to expose themselves as "gunfodder' for
the defense of the free world and now the post war babies in government
think nothing of dishonoring the sacrifices made by bomber crews and
ground personnell. This is the most dishonarable behaviour and should
be immediately canned
Yankee Whisky is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 21:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't the RAF Benevolent Fund going to take care of the maintenance?
DL-EDI is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 21:30
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speechless.........what kind of a country is this.

Last edited by waco; 30th Aug 2012 at 22:32.
waco is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 22:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newcastle
Age: 53
Posts: 613
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wasn't the RAF Benevolent Fund going to take care of the maintenance?
Yes, and wasn't it around a £1.5m for the costs.
MATELO is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 22:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Zealand
Age: 67
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good grief, the grateful public purse should cover the lot !
WanganuiLad is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 22:46
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: formally Cyprus, now UK
Posts: 351
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I visited said memorial a few days ago at London's Green Park. And may I say what an absolutely wonderful and fitting memorial it is. One of the most impressive I have seen in London. I am posting photos below for everyone to enjoy. Worth paying a homage to if you find yourself in London, its a five minute walk from Green Park tube station. As to the subject under discussion, where has it been said that the four 'campaigners' have to pay the maintenance costs ? I have to see the official mention to believe it because so far its only a rumour mentioned here. It is absurd if true. Also, from what I saw, what maintenance is needed ? None apparent in the short term and certainly not in the lifetime of the said campaigners.











Last edited by cyflyer; 30th Aug 2012 at 23:02.
cyflyer is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 23:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nice pictures... Thank you.

Now how is this going to cost that amount of money to upkeep every year?

And in no way should the four involved in this project have to bare the cost of the unkeep.
Jet Jockey A4 is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 23:36
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Now how is this going to cost that amount of money to upkeep every year?"

That was my thought as well.


The grass is probably already cut because of where it is located
so a bit of rubbish picking up, bin emptying and cleaning, maybe
even a light bulb or two ?

Anything else to add that would take it to 500k ?
500N is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 00:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anything else to add that would take it to 500k ?
Helping to pay for the Olympic Games?.....

Social Security benefits for those who arrived yesterday?.....

?........

Last edited by At ease; 31st Aug 2012 at 00:15.
At ease is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 01:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swindonshire
Posts: 2,006
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
Can I just clarify whether this is a new development, or a repeat/evolution of the story from mid-June which noted that the trustees faced the risk of having to find £500k to meet the costs of the unveiling ceremony if the money was not forthcoming from elsewhere? It's mentioned on the Bomber Command Memoral thread.

It sounds as though it's the previous story reappearing with details changed - otherwise the trustees would be facing costs of £1 million if the upkeep were to be ½ million to be 1added to the ½ million outstanding for the unveiling ceremony costs.

So has more insult been heaped upon the trustees? Or is this a mangling of the original story? And since there's been little, if anything about this in the media since mid-June, has the original issue not yet arisen or gone away (donations have bridged the gap)?
Archimedes is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 09:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by City Flyer
Sorry, but I think something has been lost in communication here.
Originally Posted by Archimedes
And since there's been little, if anything about this in the media since mid-June
Agreed. I think I'll hold back on condemning the country/government on this basis until there's some confirmation of the rumour.
DL-EDI is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 09:52
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 270
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like a load of bollox story made up by the Daily Mail to me
MFC_Fly is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 10:23
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Isn't Ashcroft still a tax exile despite his promises to become UK domiciled? I would happily see a penalty imposed on him to fulfil any such obligations.
You may well be right about his tax status, but Ashcroft is an asset to the country. One example I can quote is his donation of £5m to the Imperial War Museum to set up the Extraordinary Heroes Gallery which displays Ashcroft's collection of Victoria Crosses and George Crosses, by far the biggest in the world.

Start penalising him and he could well take his ball and go and play somewhere else, which would deprive the IWM of a fantastic asset.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 10:30
  #15 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I think the RAF BF has undertaken responsibility for the memorial but that is really just another charity largely (well it was) by charitable extraction from peoples', officers especially, salaries.

I once 'stopped' my payment as I was switching how I paid and was immediately summonsed to OC PMS for a lecture on the benefits of contributing etc etc and would I reconsider my decision.

He went a bit red when he discovered I had simply switched to a Deed of Covenant for tax purposes
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 19:56
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,743
Received 165 Likes on 58 Posts
OP:
Nobody ever told them that those 4 individuals have to pay for the maintenance costs. The up keep will cost £500,000, that's £150,000 each. These elderly heroes only have 1 year to come up with the money.
OK, I'll bite. Could we have a link please, because my understanding is as others who have posted, which is that the continuing responsibility for upkeep and maintenance lies with RAFBF:
Air Marshal Sir Robert Wright, RAF Benevolent Fund Controller says:

“We are honoured to take on the guardianship of this Memorial. This means a great deal to the RAF serving personnel and veterans we support every day. Our work and our programme of education and engagement will ensure that the Memorial’s significance continues to be understood by future generations, as part of the debt we owe to members of the Royal Air Force, past and present.”
What is outrageous (in my view) is that a certain amount of the VAT and the cost of security for the unveiling ceremony has been stated by HMG to be the responsibility of the Memorial Campaign. Perhaps this is what you have in mind. If so I believe that a petition calling for both to be met by HMG has been created. Can anyone else confirm and perhaps lead us to it?

Edited to answer my own query. Press outrage pedal to the floor and sign now!:
Remove VAT On The Bomber Command Memorial - e-petitions

Last edited by Chugalug2; 31st Aug 2012 at 20:09. Reason: Added link to epetition
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 20:17
  #17 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
signed with 3 of us. way to go yet.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 22:50
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Droitwich Spa
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bomber Command Memorial

6693 and counting
Bob Wyer is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 05:45
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I attempted to sign the petition, as a very large number of Australians served with B.C.

When I clicked on the "No" radio button option for UK residency status, this:

You must be a British citizen or normally live in the UK to create or sign e-petitions.
was the message received.
At ease is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 12:13
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
I guess the British Government is under enough pressure on numerous issues from folks living in the UK and are happy to limit the numbers as much as possible?

Try again and click 'yes' this time!

Oh, no, that would be dishonest, so don't do that.

Mask up, take cover!
Courtney Mil is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.