Bomber Command members forced to pay for memorial
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: EU
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bomber Command members forced to pay for memorial
A memorial was recently set up in London to recognise the heroic acts of the members of Bomber Command - finally. Now it's been built the war heros are being forced to pay for the maintenance of the whole thing.
They never had any sort of memorial, so 4 members campaigned for one to be set up. Nobody ever told them that those 4 individuals have to pay for the maintenance costs. The up keep will cost £500,000, that's £150,000 each. These elderly heroes only have 1 year to come up with the money.
They can't get out of it, their only hope is that somebody sponsors them.
Disgusting or what?
They never had any sort of memorial, so 4 members campaigned for one to be set up. Nobody ever told them that those 4 individuals have to pay for the maintenance costs. The up keep will cost £500,000, that's £150,000 each. These elderly heroes only have 1 year to come up with the money.
They can't get out of it, their only hope is that somebody sponsors them.
Disgusting or what?
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal
Age: 92
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Monument to WW2 Bomber Command
They were good enough to expose themselves as "gunfodder' for
the defense of the free world and now the post war babies in government
think nothing of dishonoring the sacrifices made by bomber crews and
ground personnell. This is the most dishonarable behaviour and should
be immediately canned
the defense of the free world and now the post war babies in government
think nothing of dishonoring the sacrifices made by bomber crews and
ground personnell. This is the most dishonarable behaviour and should
be immediately canned
I visited said memorial a few days ago at London's Green Park. And may I say what an absolutely wonderful and fitting memorial it is. One of the most impressive I have seen in London. I am posting photos below for everyone to enjoy. Worth paying a homage to if you find yourself in London, its a five minute walk from Green Park tube station. As to the subject under discussion, where has it been said that the four 'campaigners' have to pay the maintenance costs ? I have to see the official mention to believe it because so far its only a rumour mentioned here. It is absurd if true. Also, from what I saw, what maintenance is needed ? None apparent in the short term and certainly not in the lifetime of the said campaigners.
Last edited by cyflyer; 30th Aug 2012 at 23:02.
Nice pictures... Thank you.
Now how is this going to cost that amount of money to upkeep every year?
And in no way should the four involved in this project have to bare the cost of the unkeep.
Now how is this going to cost that amount of money to upkeep every year?
And in no way should the four involved in this project have to bare the cost of the unkeep.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Now how is this going to cost that amount of money to upkeep every year?"
That was my thought as well.
The grass is probably already cut because of where it is located
so a bit of rubbish picking up, bin emptying and cleaning, maybe
even a light bulb or two ?
Anything else to add that would take it to 500k ?
That was my thought as well.
The grass is probably already cut because of where it is located
so a bit of rubbish picking up, bin emptying and cleaning, maybe
even a light bulb or two ?
Anything else to add that would take it to 500k ?
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anything else to add that would take it to 500k ?
Social Security benefits for those who arrived yesterday?.....
?........
Last edited by At ease; 31st Aug 2012 at 00:15.
Can I just clarify whether this is a new development, or a repeat/evolution of the story from mid-June which noted that the trustees faced the risk of having to find £500k to meet the costs of the unveiling ceremony if the money was not forthcoming from elsewhere? It's mentioned on the Bomber Command Memoral thread.
It sounds as though it's the previous story reappearing with details changed - otherwise the trustees would be facing costs of £1 million if the upkeep were to be ½ million to be 1added to the ½ million outstanding for the unveiling ceremony costs.
So has more insult been heaped upon the trustees? Or is this a mangling of the original story? And since there's been little, if anything about this in the media since mid-June, has the original issue not yet arisen or gone away (donations have bridged the gap)?
It sounds as though it's the previous story reappearing with details changed - otherwise the trustees would be facing costs of £1 million if the upkeep were to be ½ million to be 1added to the ½ million outstanding for the unveiling ceremony costs.
So has more insult been heaped upon the trustees? Or is this a mangling of the original story? And since there's been little, if anything about this in the media since mid-June, has the original issue not yet arisen or gone away (donations have bridged the gap)?
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by City Flyer
Sorry, but I think something has been lost in communication here.
Originally Posted by Archimedes
And since there's been little, if anything about this in the media since mid-June
Isn't Ashcroft still a tax exile despite his promises to become UK domiciled? I would happily see a penalty imposed on him to fulfil any such obligations.
Start penalising him and he could well take his ball and go and play somewhere else, which would deprive the IWM of a fantastic asset.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
I think the RAF BF has undertaken responsibility for the memorial but that is really just another charity largely (well it was) by charitable extraction from peoples', officers especially, salaries.
I once 'stopped' my payment as I was switching how I paid and was immediately summonsed to OC PMS for a lecture on the benefits of contributing etc etc and would I reconsider my decision.
He went a bit red when he discovered I had simply switched to a Deed of Covenant for tax purposes
I once 'stopped' my payment as I was switching how I paid and was immediately summonsed to OC PMS for a lecture on the benefits of contributing etc etc and would I reconsider my decision.
He went a bit red when he discovered I had simply switched to a Deed of Covenant for tax purposes
OP:
OK, I'll bite. Could we have a link please, because my understanding is as others who have posted, which is that the continuing responsibility for upkeep and maintenance lies with RAFBF:
What is outrageous (in my view) is that a certain amount of the VAT and the cost of security for the unveiling ceremony has been stated by HMG to be the responsibility of the Memorial Campaign. Perhaps this is what you have in mind. If so I believe that a petition calling for both to be met by HMG has been created. Can anyone else confirm and perhaps lead us to it?
Edited to answer my own query. Press outrage pedal to the floor and sign now!:
Remove VAT On The Bomber Command Memorial - e-petitions
Nobody ever told them that those 4 individuals have to pay for the maintenance costs. The up keep will cost £500,000, that's £150,000 each. These elderly heroes only have 1 year to come up with the money.
Air Marshal Sir Robert Wright, RAF Benevolent Fund Controller says:
“We are honoured to take on the guardianship of this Memorial. This means a great deal to the RAF serving personnel and veterans we support every day. Our work and our programme of education and engagement will ensure that the Memorial’s significance continues to be understood by future generations, as part of the debt we owe to members of the Royal Air Force, past and present.”
“We are honoured to take on the guardianship of this Memorial. This means a great deal to the RAF serving personnel and veterans we support every day. Our work and our programme of education and engagement will ensure that the Memorial’s significance continues to be understood by future generations, as part of the debt we owe to members of the Royal Air Force, past and present.”
Edited to answer my own query. Press outrage pedal to the floor and sign now!:
Remove VAT On The Bomber Command Memorial - e-petitions
Last edited by Chugalug2; 31st Aug 2012 at 20:09. Reason: Added link to epetition
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I attempted to sign the petition, as a very large number of Australians served with B.C.
When I clicked on the "No" radio button option for UK residency status, this:
was the message received.
When I clicked on the "No" radio button option for UK residency status, this:
You must be a British citizen or normally live in the UK to create or sign e-petitions.
I guess the British Government is under enough pressure on numerous issues from folks living in the UK and are happy to limit the numbers as much as possible?
Try again and click 'yes' this time!
Oh, no, that would be dishonest, so don't do that.
Mask up, take cover!
Try again and click 'yes' this time!
Oh, no, that would be dishonest, so don't do that.
Mask up, take cover!