Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Iran 'pimps' Tu-154 - for F-5 ejection seat tests

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Iran 'pimps' Tu-154 - for F-5 ejection seat tests

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Aug 2012, 11:38
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dreamland
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
27mm, Lump = camera fairing? useful to see the seat as it leaves. For the rest I would imagine it is just plain structure to attach to the fin, oh and the seat as well.
Harley Quinn is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 11:42
  #22 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Mrs PN's considered view (3 seconds) is it's a mockup.

As for downward moment when a seat if fired, if it is a rocket seat that will surely be minimal? CofG wise is certainly an issue presumably with a pitch down.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 11:47
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Aft CofG? No...

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviatio.../3/1554355.jpg
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 11:49
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,197
Received 114 Likes on 51 Posts
How long before we get a VC10 photo....
downsizer is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 12:17
  #25 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by cattletruck
How would a thousand of these versus say 40 fully armed F-22s fair? Turning it into a war of attrition seems like their best option.
Nah, target rich environment
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 21:55
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,273
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Now who said that quantity has a quality all of it's own?
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 21:57
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,373
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by TBM-Legend
Now who said that quantity has a quality all of it's own?
Stalin (?)
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2012, 22:10
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Nah, target rich environment"

What if the targets don't mind dying and are prepared to come at you head on in the face of certain interception? Who wins a fight of attrition when the number of defending missiles is less than the number of would-be suicides?
Milo Minderbinder is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 04:48
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Why oh why would I wanna be anywhere else?
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A novel idea to overcome a problem. Pity they decided to instal downward-firing bang seats in their "new" fighter
sisemen is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 06:03
  #30 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Milo, old Israeli proverb.

Quality over quantity but it is best in large numbers.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 12:53
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Philippines
Age: 81
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A few not unreasonable concerns expressed on the possible risks of some sort of structural failure during tests. The TU 154 is a pretty sturdy beast but, I wonder what the condition now is with regard to basic structural integrity corrosion wise. If that airframe has been around in Iran for any length of time, one might start to worry on that side of things also. This might well be an additional factor; the straw that broke the camel's back even
Q-RTF-X is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 12:57
  #32 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 831
Received 29 Likes on 15 Posts
If it's successful,a video will be released to the world as is done with their missile tests.If not,no video.
TWT is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 13:26
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wilds of Warwickshire
Posts: 240
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
I wonder if they know the story of the Embraer which departed and broke up just because one half of the Stabiliser deicing boot came loose?

KB
KiloB is online now  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 14:49
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: uk
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Does anyone here really think that the iranians wouldn't have thought about c of g problems? Or that a mere 600lb-ish of disposable weight would seriously affect an aircraft of that size? Or that they didn't do a thorough stress / aerodynamic analysis first? Guys, these people are building atomic weapons (ie space launchers and re-entry vehicles or something damn close), they aren't rank amateurs (like us). If they can stick twin tails and associated controls on an old F5 they can certainly do this.

Anyway, what's to say the Ayatollahs Peoples "Democratic" chop-yer-hands-off Republics Holy Propaganda Bureau isn't p!ssing itself laughing at the effect their plasticene and cardboard joke mockup is having on the infidels?

Bit more imagination required methinks. On both counts.

Last edited by Wageslave; 30th Aug 2012 at 14:51.
Wageslave is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 17:44
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryanair are planning to sell similar seats as "Exec lounge"
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 17:53
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
Downsizer - This one?
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 20:58
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: united kingdom
Age: 62
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm confused I thought this was a new caption competition thread
zkdli is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 21:08
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
surely drag / turbulence over the tail once the canopy has been ejected is the bigger problem?
Milo Minderbinder is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 21:18
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Guys, these people are building atomic weapons (ie space launchers and re-entry vehicles or something damn close), they aren't rank amateurs
So it IS true. I knew it!!
Courtney Mil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.