Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

The South China Sea's Gathering Storm

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

The South China Sea's Gathering Storm

Old 30th Jan 2023, 08:20
  #1521 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 14,254
Received 134 Likes on 68 Posts
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/w...arns-8j5kl03hq

War with China in two years, top US general warns

China accused a senior American general of being “reckless” after he said the superpowers would be at war within two years.

In a stark warning about the chance of conflict over President Xi’s determination to seize Taiwan, General Mike Minihan, who oversees the US Air Force’s fleet of transport and refuelling aircraft, said: “I hope I am wrong. My gut tells me [we] will fight in 2025.”

In the memo obtained by NBC News, Minihan told operational commanders to make ready for combat. “Xi secured his third term and set his war council in October 2022,” he said. “Taiwan’s presidential elections are in 2024 and will offer Xi a reason. US presidential elections are in 2024 and will offer Xi a distracted America. Xi’s team, reason, and opportunity are all aligned for 2025.”…..

An air force spokeswoman, Major Hope Cronin, verified the memo’s authenticity, saying it “builds on last year’s foundational efforts by Air Mobility Command to ready forces for future conflict, should deterrence fail”.

A US defence official, meanwhile, told The Washington Post that Minihan’s comments “are not representative of the department’s view on China”. It reported that before taking over at Air Mobility Command in 2021, Minihan served in a variety of influential roles in the Pacific beginning in 2013.

They include a stint as the deputy commander of Indo-Pacific Command, with purview of China and Taiwan, from September 2019 to August 2021……

Last year Admiral Mike Gilday, chief of the US naval operations, also raised the possibility of war in the Taiwan Strait. “When we talk about the 2027 window [when China should build capability to seize Taiwan], in my mind that has to be 2022 or potentially 2023,” he said…….

ORAC is online now  
Old 30th Jan 2023, 08:35
  #1522 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,309
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
As early as the 1920s in the USA the idea of war with Japan was being bandied about. The various scenarios began to take on a life of their own, and to bring on the very thing that people feared.
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2023, 19:46
  #1523 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Washington.
Age: 72
Posts: 876
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by jolihokistix View Post
As early as the 1920s in the USA the idea of war with Japan was being bandied about. The various scenarios began to take on a life of their own, and to bring on the very thing that people feared.
Huh? Japan attacked America because America thought they would?
GlobalNav is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 03:00
  #1524 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 55
Posts: 1,437
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jolihokistix View Post
As early as the 1920s in the USA the idea of war with Japan was being bandied about. The various scenarios began to take on a life of their own, and to bring on the very thing that people feared.
Not really - Japan realised it wasn't going to be seen as an equal partner with 'Western Empires' after the Versailles Treaty in 1919...it was granted the German territories in China - it also realised having few natural resources it would need an expansionist policy (certainly the hawks in the military thought so if the government of Japan didn't). The situation in China meant conflict was inevitable and the expansionist theory would certainly bring Japan into conflict with the British, Dutch, French and Americans. And so it transpired - the US sided with the Chinese over the conflict there and the Japanese orchestrated a reason to step up military matters throughout China and S E Asia. If the Americans wouldn't give Japan the fuels it needed - it'd have to go out and grab them & to a certain extent the idea of 'Asia for the Asians' looked attractive to some countries that were under colonial government

WW1 never ended - it just rolled on and on.
Load Toad is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2023, 03:19
  #1525 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,309
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
My apologies, too simplistic, and yes of course, all of the above is true, but among the trends at the time was this yellow-peril hysteria in the western press only helping to split off the Japanese into a stereoyped 'us and them' separate entity that the J military were only too happy to take advantage of, and the populace to fall right into.

My point (admittedly weakly put) was that with the benefit of such hindsight I hope we do not fall into the same pattern with 'the Chinese', and as the good US General Minihan above, bring forwards a situation by delineating it too clearly and too publicly. Forewarned is of course forearmed, so I agree that we need to be ready for any sudden-move scenario concerning Taiwan.
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2023, 15:15
  #1526 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 14,254
Received 134 Likes on 68 Posts
BREAKING: The U.S. military has notified Congress that China now has more land-based intercontinental-range missile launchers than the US - WSJ

https://t.co/0IqtNTTWPM
ORAC is online now  
Old 7th Feb 2023, 16:48
  #1527 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 63
Posts: 6,324
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
Gee, we have a new missile gap. Deja vu, all over again.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Lonewolf_50:
Old 7th Feb 2023, 20:06
  #1528 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 14,254
Received 134 Likes on 68 Posts
I think that means the US triad is sub-standard, if you see what I mean…
ORAC is online now  
The following 2 users liked this post by ORAC:
Old 8th Feb 2023, 18:44
  #1529 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PLanet Earth
Posts: 1,219
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC View Post
I think that means the US triad is sub-standard, if you see what I mean…
Not quite, yet.
China has <<1000 Nuclear Warheads, the US has >5000.
Conventionally the Chinese Armed Forces are surely the closest competitor to the US. On the Nuclear side of things Russia is pretty much on par with to the US, whereas China is more in the order of magnitude of combined Western Europe (UK + France + Nuclear Sharing Italy, Germany, Turkye)
henra is online now  
Old 9th Feb 2023, 03:23
  #1530 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 63
Posts: 6,324
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC View Post
I think that means the US triad is sub-standard, if you see what I mean…
I see what you did there.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2023, 11:10
  #1531 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 14,254
Received 134 Likes on 68 Posts
China effectively declaring war on SpaceX and Starlink….

China Declares War on Starlink
ORAC is online now  
Old 7th Mar 2023, 12:21
  #1532 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 52
Posts: 1,958
Received 57 Likes on 21 Posts
If we are going to have a war with China, can we wait until Biden, Trudeau, Sunak, Macron, Albanese and whoever replaced St Jacinda to move on and be replaced by those with some level of competence?
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2023, 16:39
  #1533 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 5,825
Received 83 Likes on 41 Posts
really odd that they got elected when you think about it.

Lets have a lunatic who schmoozed NK and Putin
Asturias56 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 7th Mar 2023, 19:10
  #1534 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Asturias56 View Post
really odd that they got elected when you think about it.

Lets have a lunatic who schmoozed NK and Putin
By all mean, let’s continue the present path with containing the Norks as it’s been so successful.
West Coast is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2023, 23:04
  #1535 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,268
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Lots of sound and fury down here as the Sydney Morning Herald publishes a series of stories `Red Alert' about `...the coming war with China in three years.'
"Irresponsible, warmongering, sensationalist etc etc." usual bleating - and also as usual - rent a crazy quote or two from Paul Keating, a once great man who's now totally out of touch.
I wonder if the situation we may face in 2027 might in fact be a Cuba crisis redux - but this time on steroids.
China blockades Taiwan, amasses an invasion fleet, puts it's nuclear weapons on alert and finds itself surrounded by the west and allies, also with nuclear weapons cocked.
We face a week, or two, or three of terrifying, sleepless nights wondering if the world will end - then they see sense and back down (that being a considerable oversimplifcation of what happened back then).
The resolution may be in the hands of some future diplomat who has to find a concession for the Chinese to do so, while saving face...
tartare is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2023, 00:49
  #1536 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,645
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
The next war will start when the ISI wackadoodles in Pakistan lob some nukes into India, who then return the favour and then all hell brakes loose...
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2023, 07:12
  #1537 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 5,825
Received 83 Likes on 41 Posts
Originally Posted by West Coast View Post
By all mean, let’s continue the present path with containing the Norks as it’s been so successful.

To be fair we've been trying for 70 years and no-one has had much success under any US president, The issue is that the Family Kim have a clear, simple and ruthless policy of self-preservation for themselves. No-one else is quite as clear or commiited to getting shot of them. The price is too high for us- no-one will pay it.
Asturias56 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.