Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Any Phantom stories out there?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Any Phantom stories out there?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Oct 2012, 16:24
  #221 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: East Yorkshire
Age: 75
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
I seem to remember that the Phantom nosewheel steering system was susceptible to water ingress into the position feedback potentiometer on the noseleg. It was in a fairly exposed position, likely to get water thrown up at it by the nosewheels. A spurious feedback signal might command the steering motor in either direction with no input from the pilot, often with exciting results. By the time the fault is investigated the water may have evaporated or moved and it's NFF as a result. Then it's that tricky decision, do you change a component or leave everything as is?

Last edited by walbut; 8th Oct 2012 at 16:30.
walbut is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2012, 16:28
  #222 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bournemouth Ejection

Re the Bournemouth ejection, it was indeed P**e H*******s who jumped out. The pilot was D**e H****y of Tremblers. It was supposed to be me in the back that day, but I picked up a late notice weekend away to Ramstein and P**e very kindly filled my place. It caused my then fiancée some consternation when she arrived back in the UK on the Monday from a trip aboard to discover the navigator from a Tremblers jet had ejected. She knew I was supposed to be in that jet and I hadn't been able to tell her I was in Germany instead (this was well before Internet and social media). D**e torched the 'Welcome to Bournemouth' banner as he took off across the grass. It was indeed due to the notoriously fickle NWS on the FG1.
Dead Loss is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2012, 16:32
  #223 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All over the place
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gibbo586,

I was on 111 then and saw that very incident; I think it was late on a Friday Afternoon / evening and the aforementioned OC had just had the whole of his charge in the hangar to tell them that only the Aircrew were 43 Sqn and the ground crew were just Stn Support as far as he was concerned. Then he got into his jet and spun it on the run way - something to do with the effectiveness of NWS vs rudder during the take of run as explained on my next See Off. There was much jolly banter in the NAAFI / Hendies / Commie to be overheard that weekend I can tell you.

Our boss (CCC I think it was by then) got us all in the following Monday to let us know what a jolly fine team of the 111Sqn Family we were !!

Regards
H (just a Sootie)
howiehowie93 is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2012, 16:36
  #224 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 473
Received 131 Likes on 58 Posts
Then its that tricky decision, do you change a component or leave everything as is?
Of course an occasional transient fault in the SSI (Seat Stick Interface) logic processing module, can explain all kinds of strange occurrences which later prove to be impossible to reproduce.
Avionker is online now  
Old 8th Oct 2012, 17:02
  #225 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
...the aforementioned OC had just had the whole of his charge in the hangar to tell them that only the Aircrew were 43 Sqn and the ground crew were just Stn Support as far as he was concerned.
That OC can only have been The Scottish Officer....

Last edited by BEagle; 8th Oct 2012 at 17:02.
BEagle is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2012, 18:53
  #226 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember that the F4K and F4M NWS was slightly different.

The F4M had a linear output, but the F4K was expotential, to reduce its sensitivity around the neutral, (something to to with moving around a carrier deck?)
This could have led to the pilot thinking that nothing was happening until it suddenly 'oversteered'!

Its a long time ago, and I do not have my course notes, so I stand to be corrected on this!

BEagle, you are correct as to the identity of the pilot.
gibbo568 is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2012, 19:04
  #227 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 71
Posts: 776
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
It must be one of the few aircraft still airworthy after being abandoned by its crew”.
One of our phantoms topped that one. It landed on it´s own, bent its nosegear when the jet left the runway and came to a stop in the gras, as the set power of around 90% couldn´t drive it forward any longer.
The firebrigade had easy access to shut down the engines, as the canopies had given way to the seats and their occupants. On short final a flock of birds caused an erratic evasive maneuver of the student pilot in the front seat, which scared himself that much, that he gave up the stick and grabbed for the ejection handle. The IP no longer in the backseat could do nothing else but watch the now pilotless aircraft land in the touchdownzone before he himself hit the ground.

The jet was repaired end reentered service few month later.

franzl
RetiredF4 is offline  
Old 11th Oct 2012, 18:01
  #228 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: twilightzone
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't there a "I Learnt About Flying" report once about an F4 in the Falklands that landed with aerial wire caught on the fin, shortly followed shortly by a call from an irate farmer who'd had his aerial ripped out by a low flying aircraft?

If my memory serves me correctly, the aerial was something like 30 feet above ground which meant the aircraft must have been almost scraping mud or it was inverted!!

TRUE....saw the culprit 2 days ago.......He was posted back to the UK at short notice......I had to replace him at very short notice!!

I think they worked out he must have got down to about 10ft.......very impressive it must have looked too!!
Throb@30wCPDLC is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 13:27
  #229 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FI F4 aerial snag

See #51. Did he ever receive the photos I brought back?

Great timing (by Biffo?) to be there as the crew suffered a "lapse in concentration".

From memory, it was port wing low, almost 90 AOB, and the aerial was 27' agl taken into the LH engine, so about 10' would be right.

I'm glad I've never been so distracted to fly so close to something with Pk=1.
How on earth could we have mistaken the taxi way at MPA for the runway and be looking up at our groundcrew on top of the revetments whilst overshooting?
Exmil is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 14:19
  #230 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,367
Received 1,568 Likes on 714 Posts
Dorset Aircraft Crashes:
19-8-84 XV569/Q Phantom FG.1

Had a problem on take-off and the navigator ejected while the aircraft was still on the runway. He was badly injured in the subsequent landing but the pilot managed to keep control of the aircraft and made a safe landing at RAF Lyneham.

ORAC is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2012, 14:55
  #231 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK
Age: 78
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nose wheel thingy

Bill Freeman had a severe case of the nose wheel thingy at Aldergrove in about 76 finishing up on the grass with the nose wheel sticking up into the cockpit.

I was the Canberra TP for the same unit, 23 MU, and saw the take off.

I don't think there ever was an explanation

There was an RAF advert running in the press at the time with a phantom and the word "Peacekeeper" The helo pilots changed it to "peacekeepoffdegrass" and put it on the mess notice board

Bill saw the funny side of it

Last edited by Tinribs; 23rd Oct 2012 at 14:56.
Tinribs is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 00:23
  #232 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Falkland Islands
Posts: 169
Received 26 Likes on 3 Posts
From my post #35 -

Wasn't there a "I Learnt About Flying" report once about an F4 in the Falklands that landed with aerial wire caught on the fin, shortly followed shortly by a call from an irate farmer who'd had his aerial ripped out by a low flying aircraft?
True story, but there was no "call from an irate farmer". The farmers were my father-in-law and brother-in-law, my wife took a photo of the rear half of the Phantom as it disappeared behind the house, taking out the ham radio aerial - so 30 ft is about right!! When the investigating team arrived, asking questions about when the wire had been broken, they all denied any knowledge of the flyby. Flybys were definitely encouraged and that farm would never complain. Used to get some pretty spectacular Herc flybys there too, up the valley behind the shearing shed, sadly times have changed, and lucky to get the occasional 250' pass now............
I have just scanned the photo - I had not remembered it quite right, the aircraft was not quite disappearing behind the house, but not far off it !!

(Yes Exmil - as you said above, it is Biffo's photo)


Last edited by Ant T; 14th Nov 2012 at 09:20. Reason: Credit photographer........
Ant T is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 01:47
  #233 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,833
Received 72 Likes on 28 Posts
they all denied any knowledge of the flyby
Well done them.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 16:27
  #234 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Argentina
Age: 48
Posts: 132
Received 45 Likes on 13 Posts
Great pic and story, thanks for sharing it!
Marcantilan is online now  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 19:32
  #235 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Holy Mother******ing **** **** **** ****er,
that is INSANE.

Cool as ninja's on motorcycles with shotguns though...........
Was the pilot mental? I know it was in the good old days and men were men but thats not low - thats mowing the grass.

Never in my wildest dreams would I have believed anyone went that low without proof.

Nutter, with balls and skills, but still nutter.
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 19:35
  #236 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"they all denied any knowledge of the flyby"

"Well done them. "


Agree.


How long before the photo surfaced ?
500N is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 19:39
  #237 (permalink)  
si.
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northumberland
Age: 52
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've rubbed my eyes a few times, and still think that F4 looks rather low...

It's a good job the thread discussing the minimum altitude over the piano keys isn't still on the front page...
si. is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 20:25
  #238 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
...but F4 pilots weren't the ones accused of being too high over the piano keys.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 21:01
  #239 (permalink)  
si.
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northumberland
Age: 52
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even on a 3 deg approach, he wasn't going to make Stanley's keys at over 50'

Fuse lit, no wait and watch.....
si. is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2012, 21:06
  #240 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
The only rule at Stanley was to hit the first cable.
Courtney Mil is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.