Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Tornado F3 Over Lincolnshire

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Tornado F3 Over Lincolnshire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jun 2012, 20:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Tornado F3 Over Lincolnshire

Just happened to outside the office at the windy Lincolnshire cabbage patch today when a Tornado F3 in what looked like 25 Sqn markings flew over. I thought they were all gone! Somebody at Boscombe Down still operating one? Can't find anything on the web about it.
MAINJAFAD is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2012, 21:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UTOPIA
Posts: 111
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QinetiQ at Boscome are still flying them
12 twists per inch is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 07:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Age: 52
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tornado F.3 ZH552 • FighterControl • Military Aviation Forum
ukmil is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 08:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Something not quite what it would seem with that AC and I don't just mean the canopy either..............
glad rag is offline  
Old 2nd Jun 2012, 11:58
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A Fine City
Age: 57
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Thanks for that, a bit of further research shows that three are still in use for Meteor AAM trials, and one is in 25 Sqn markings.
MAINJAFAD is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2012, 09:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn, thats a pretty looking jet,
apart from being in the wrong sqn colours.....

why don't they re-engine one wiv a pair of EJ200's to see what it would do.
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2012, 12:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: upstairs
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ISTR that EJ200 was sized to be able to do this but the SPS gearbox interface is quite different. QQ may have offered to do a quick and dirty conversion to trial the fit but without a bigger wing, there probably wouldn't be that much benefit.
EAP86 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 10:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
apart from the fact that in dry an EJ gives more thrust than a 104 in blower....
60 dry and 90 wet IIRC as opposed to 40 ish and 60 ish
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 11:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Frozen South
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fastest aircraft in RAF history?

Last edited by BlindWingy; 5th Jun 2012 at 11:31.
BlindWingy is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 11:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fastest aircraft in RAF history?
Nope, the F4J would have it by just a touch.
dat581 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 12:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Fastest at low level, and that's the fun bit!
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 12:35
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Faster than a Lightning? Mach 2.27 @40,000ft
A2QFI is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 14:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, Operation Skyburner Mach 2.5 @47,000ft with an unmodified aircraft.

Plus 1,606.342 mph with water injection, think that's Mach 2.6 but would need air data to convert properly.
dat581 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 18:10
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the clouds
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boscombe F3's are a relativly common site at low level in Wales..



Never seen their F2 low though ?

BW
Bubblewindow is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 22:55
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
Definately fastest at low level - chased down F-111s and B-1Bs trying to do their best as well! Don't forget that her design spec was to shoot down BEARs and BLACKJACKs low level over the North Sea, so speed was a large part of the key user requirements (or whatever they were in the 70s).

The picture in Wales above ^^^^ shows her clean winged as well. I remember when they arrived from Warton like that and M2.1 to 2.2 was quite easy at ~40-45kft.

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2012, 07:22
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the clouds
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Just as a matter of intrest, the Boscombe F3's seem to fly low level with the wings fully forward all the time.
Does anybody know the reason for this?

BW
Bubblewindow is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2012, 08:50
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
BubbleW

If they're flying the Mach Loop then you need to be in 25wing to get the manoeuvrability - it can be done in 45 wing but you need to allow for a bit extra. If you want to fly at high IAS then you sweep the wings to 45 wing and if you want to go for it then get them back to 67 wing! In 67 you get no manouevre flaps or slats and in 45 you get a partial amount - only in 25 do you get the full amount of flaps/slats and that is why you use it for the best manoeuvrability.

All the best

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2012, 08:56
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North West England
Age: 54
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember a tale of a Jarman ECR out-running a Mig 29 during the Balkan unpleasantnesses, at low-level. Anyone else?
Gaz ED is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2012, 09:25
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
Was happily chasing an Iraqi MiG 23 and ran out of UNSCR no-fly zone airspace!
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2012, 10:53
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the clouds
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they're flying the Mach Loop then you need to be in 25wing to get the manoeuvrability - it can be done in 45 wing but you need to allow for a bit extra. If you want to fly at high IAS then you sweep the wings to 45 wing and if you want to go for it then get them back to 67 wing! In 67 you get no manouevre flaps or slats and in 45 you get a partial amount - only in 25 do you get the full amount of flaps/slats and that is why you use it for the best manoeuvrability.
Cheers for that LJ. Understand the above just never seen a GR4 do it at 25 wing,
have even seen GR4's at 67

BW
Bubblewindow is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.